Amritsar train tragedy: Probe report holds railway gateman, organisers of Dussehra event responsible
Chandigarh, Dec 6: A magisterial probe into the Amritsar train tragedy in which around 60 people died, has held the gateman at a nearby railway crossing and the organisers of the Dussehra event responsible for "various acts of omissions and commissions", leading to the incident.
The probe report, however, gave a "clean chit" to Navjot Kaur Sidhu, wife of Punjab minister Navjot Singh Sidhu, who was the chief guest at the Dussehra event, saying "she had no role in organising the event".
Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh Thursday evening ordered stern action against all those found responsible for the Amritsar train tragedy.
The report observed that the spectators "committed the mistake" of watching the Dussehra event while standing on railway tracks.
The magisterial inquiry into the incident, which claimed around 60 lives on Dussehra, was conducted by Jalandhar Divisional Commissioner B Purushartha, who was appointed as the special executive magistrate.
The crowd was watching the burning of a Ravana effigy near Joda Phatak on October 19 when they were mowed down by a passing train.
A 300-page report of magisterial probe into the accident was submitted to the Punjab Home Secretary last month.
"While the spectators committed the mistake of watching this event from rail tracks, the organisers held this event without any permission and without undertaking required safety and security measures," the report observed.
It blamed police and functionaries of the municipal corporation for their failure to enforce the law and showing unwanted generosity, while the key rail employees failed to take safety and security measures even after having full knowledge of presence of a large number of people on and around the rail tracks.
"Gateman of Jaura Phatak (gate no. 27) Amit Singh has not only failed in discharging his statutory duties but also committed a blunder in not taking appropriate safety and security measures which could have easily prevented this accident. He is one of those key railway employees whose blunder has resulted into this accident," the report said.
The inquiry report also blamed the gateman of another gate (no. 26) for his "failure".
"It is also evident that gateman of railways level crossing (gate no. 26) Nirmal Singh also failed in discharging his statutory duties by his late reaction in informing the gateman of Jaura Phatak (gate no. 27). He came to know about this gathering on rail tracks at around 5.30 pm, but informed the gateman of Jaura Phatak (gate no. 27) at around 6.40-6.45 pm," it said.
He did not inform the station master concerned and keep giving green signals to approaching trains, the report said.
The report indicted Saurabh Mithu Madan, the son of a Congress councillor, who had organised the event.
"The organisers were not having any approval/permission required for holding this event of Dussehra celebration, including Ravan Dahan, at Dhobi Ghat and they held the event in an illegal manner, compromising the safety and security of spectators' life," the report said.
"It is also evident that the organisers conducted this event without taking adequate precautions/measures to ensure safety and security of the people gathered to watch Dussehra celebration and Ravan Dahan," the probe report said.
Blaming the organisers for failing to inform the Railways, the report said, "The organisers neither informed the Railways nor took any precautions and safety measures to stop people from watching the celebrations from rail tracks."
The inquiry report also made it clear that Navjot Kaur Sidhu, who attended the function as a Chief Guest, had no role in organising the event.
"Had the organisers been sensitive to the safety and security of the people watching the Dussehra celebrations and taken the simple action of putting a view cutter of 10-12 feet height along the boundary wall separating the ground and rail tracks, the accident could have been prevented," the report said.
The statements of over 150 people, including railway officials and Navjot Kaur Sidhu, were recorded by Purushartha, while Navjot Singh Sidhu, who had questioned the Railways for giving clean chit to loco-pilot of the train, had submitted his statement in writing.
Meanwhile, former MLA Navjot Kaur Sidhu said they did not "influence" the inquiry into the Amritsar train tragedy in any manner.
"We would have been wrong had we tried to influence the inquiry in any manner," she said, adding that there was no effort whatsoever on her and his husband part to try to "mould or change the facts" of inquiry.
Her statement came after the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) condemned the "clean chit" given to Sidhu and his wife in the Amritsar train tragedy.
The SAD alleged that the inquiry commission was "tailor made to save" the couple and it had "done its job accordingly".
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Extreme weather may pose risk to inflation, says RBI Bulletin
Mumbai (PTI): Extreme weather conditions may pose a risk to inflation, along with prolonged geopolitical tensions that could keep crude oil prices volatile, the Reserve Bank's April Bulletin said on Tuesday.
The retail based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) has eased to 4.9 per cent in March after averaging 5.1 per cent in the preceding two months.
The Reserve Bank, which mainly factors in CPI while arriving at its bi-monthly monetary policy, has kept the key interest rate unchanged at 6.5 per cent since February 2023, citing concerns on the inflation front.
An article on 'State of the Economy' published in the Bulletin further said global growth momentum has been sustained in the first quarter of 2024, and the outlook for world trade is turning positive.
Treasury yields and mortgage rates are ticking up in major economies as expectations of interest rate cuts are being pared.
"In India, conditions are shaping up for an extension of a trend upshift in real GDP growth, backed by strong investment demand and upbeat business and consumer sentiments," the article said.
The RBI, however, said the views expressed in the Bulletin article are of the authors and do not represent the views of the Reserve Bank of India.
