In a surprising turn of events, the entire board of directors at 23andMe, a DNA testing company based in San Francisco, resigned in September after a contentious month-long dispute regarding co-founder and CEO Anne Wojcicki's plans to take the company private. Following the mass resignations, Wojcicki, who holds 49.75% of the voting rights, is now the sole board member of the company.

The departing board members, including notable figures like YouTube CEO Neal Mohan and Sequoia Capital's Roelof Botha, expressed their ongoing belief in 23andMe's mission to personalize healthcare through genetic data. However, they indicated a fundamental disagreement with Wojcicki's strategic vision for the company's future.

In her first interview with Fortune since the board's resignation, Wojcicki acknowledged the complexities of the situation but expressed confidence in her ability to guide the company through its challenges. The tension between her and the board had escalated over her proposal to take the company private, a move that arose as 23andMe's valuation plummeted from $6 billion in 2021 to under $150 million.

The company's troubles began following its initial public offering (IPO) in 2021, when its stock debuted at $10 (approximately ₹840) per share but has since struggled, dipping to a record low of $0.30 (around ₹25) in 2024. Despite significant efforts, 23andMe has yet to turn a profit, facing declining sales and serious privacy concerns after a major data breach. Additionally, its drug discovery business, which was a financial drain, has been shut down.

Wojcicki's plan to take the company private was initially rejected by the board, who cited the absence of a premium offer for shareholders. The deadlock ultimately led to the board's resignation, despite Wojcicki’s assertion that her voting rights reflect her commitment to the company’s success. "I've always said ever since the very beginning, I don't need to be in charge. There's no ego for me. I care about the vision and the mission," she remarked.

A former leader at 23andMe indicated that the board's departure was not unexpected, shedding light on Wojcicki's leadership style. While publicly charismatic, she has been characterized as stubborn and controlling behind closed doors. Former employees have pointed to her leadership challenges and internal power struggles as significant issues that have surfaced since the company's IPO.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi: A visit by the US Ambassador to India, Sergio Gor, to Chandigarh on Monday has triggered sharp criticism from opposition leaders and social media users, raising questions about national security and foreign policy.

On X, Ambassador Gor announced his visit, writing, “Just landed in Chandigarh. Looking forward to visiting the Western Command of the Indian Army.”

Soon after, opposition voices questioned the broader implications of the visit. Congress Kerala, in a post, commented, “Why so much panic? We’ve already seen Pakistan's ISI getting access to Pathankot Airbase with this government's blessings. Didn't they say then ‘Modi ne kiya ho to kuch soch samajh kar kiya hoga?’ Compared to that, this is very small.”

Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Priyanka Chaturvedi also weighed in, writing, “Since India’s national strategic interests are now tied to what US wants India to do, this visit seems to sync with that.”

She further added, “India’s history will remember the de-escalation announcement between India and Pak was announced on social media by the US President before Indians got to know from their own government. US Ambassador is doing the job for his nation, who is doing for us? The answer is blowing in the wind.”

The visit comes against the backdrop of the growing US-India defence partnership.

Writer and political analyst @rajuparulekar commented on ‘X’, “East India Company is back!”

“Is it allowed for an ambassador to visit any army unit in india?” asked another user.

Several X users expressed concerns over the appropriateness of the visit.

One asked, “Is it allowed for an ambassador to visit any army unit in India?” Another wrote, “Why an ambassador visiting our army places? To talk to Chandigarh lobby for F-35?”

“We have completely sold Indian sovereignty. Rothschild the evil Bankers will now control NSE. Modi sold Bharat Mata to Trump . And now American imperialist is visiting our army command . Scary,” wrote another user.

“The Indian Army isn’t part of geopolitics, so why is he interested in visiting there?,” opined another.

On Sunday, Gor welcomed Admiral Samuel Paparo, Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM), highlighting efforts to expand the growing US-India defence partnership.

In a post on X, Gor wrote, “Delighted to have @INDOPACOM Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo in India to expand the U.S.-India defense partnership. Now is the time to strengthen vital cooperation between our two nations.”

On Monday, Admiral Samuel J. Paparo Jr visited the headquarters of India’s Western Army Command along with the American envoy Sergio Gor. The delegation was briefed on the formation’s capabilities, its past operations, and future plans.

The American delegation also visited Bengaluru, where they met three start-ups, two in the space sector and one in defence, and participated in an Indo-US conference.