Johnson & Johnson’s $8.2 billion talc bankruptcy deal faces legal challenges in January trial
Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to resolve thousands of lawsuits over claims that its talc-based baby powder causes cancer now rests on a high-stakes trial set for January 2024. The case will determine whether the company’s $8.2 billion settlement plan, which J&J hopes will fast-track resolution through bankruptcy, will be approved by the court.
J&J has faced 15 years of litigation regarding allegations that its baby powder contained asbestos, causing ovarian cancer and other health issues—a claim the company denies. Despite previous failures to settle the claims through bankruptcy in New Jersey, J&J has now moved proceedings to Texas, hoping for a more favorable outcome.
While J&J announced that over 75% of claimants had voted in favor of the new deal, Andy Birchfield, an attorney representing a group of plaintiffs, has accused the company of manipulating the vote. He claims that EPIQ, the consulting firm managing the vote, allowed another attorney, Allen Smith, to improperly switch 11,434 votes from “no” to “yes.” Birchfield is demanding the votes be reversed, accusing J&J of rigging the bankruptcy process to minimize legitimate claims.
J&J’s Erik Haas, head of global litigation, defended the process, insisting the vote was conducted according to rules and reflected the claimants' desire for a quick resolution. Haas emphasized that the proposed settlement—one of the largest in mass tort history—offers fair compensation and will end years of litigation.
The controversy over the vote reflects deeper tensions between plaintiffs' attorneys. Smith, who once partnered with Birchfield on these cases, switched his clients' votes to favor the deal, citing the need to end protracted litigation. Smith, under financial pressure due to $240 million in litigation debt, argued that the revised offer provided fair compensation for clients. Birchfield, however, accused Smith of betraying former clients for financial gain and filed a lawsuit against him.
The outcome of these legal battles will shape whether EPIQ remains responsible for overseeing the bankruptcy claims process, which could yield millions in fees.
J&J is betting on the enhanced settlement and bankruptcy process to handle over 60,000 claims, arguing that it’s the only way to avoid decades of costly litigation. If approved, the bankruptcy would bind all plaintiffs, including those who opposed the deal, and establish a trust to handle future cancer claims.
However, critics warn that moving the case to Texas—considered more business-friendly—raises concerns about fairness. Judge Christopher Lopez will need to decide whether the contested votes were valid and whether the bankruptcy should proceed in Texas, especially after two previous bankruptcy attempts were blocked in New Jersey. Lopez has also halted all talc trials while the bankruptcy plan is under review.
If the bankruptcy plan succeeds, it would settle most current talc-related lawsuits and limit J&J's liability for future claims. However, an appeal is expected, potentially delaying final resolution. Larry Biegelsen, an analyst at Wells Fargo, noted that year-end resolution is possible if the court approves the deal, though the process will likely remain contested.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Adani group denies bribery charge, says they are baseless
New Delhi (PTI): Adani group on Thursday denied charges of paying bribe to secure favourable terms for solar power contracts, saying the allegations by US prosecutors are baseless and the conglomerate is compliant with all laws.
It said all possible legal recourse will be sought.
"The allegations made by the US Department of Justice and the US Securities and Exchange Commission against directors of Adani Green are baseless and denied," the group spokesperson said in a statement.
Billionaire Gautam Adani has been charged by US prosecutors for allegedly being part of a scheme to pay over USD 250 million (about Rs 2,100 crore) bribe to Indian officials in exchange of favourable terms for solar power contracts.
Commenting on the development, the spokesperson pointed to US Department of Justice statement that said "the charges in the indictment are allegations and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty".
"The Adani Group has always upheld and is steadfastly committed to maintaining the highest standards of governance, transparency and regulatory compliance across all jurisdictions of its operations. We assure our stakeholders, partners and employees that we are a law-abiding organisation, fully compliant with all laws," the spokesperson added.
