The developments witnessed in Dakshina Kannada district over the past few days have exposed who actually controls the law and order situation in the district. When the deputy commissioner (DC) warns miscreants not to take the law into their hands, the DC not only receives open threats to life but also gets transferred within two days of having issued the warning. People’s representatives who are supposed to extend support to the DC, assigned with the responsibility of maintaining the law and order in the district, choose to not react, thereby extending their silent support to the anti-social elements. These developments have raised several significant questions and triggered anxiety among the people of the district whether the Sangha Parivar is a sub-branch of the police department.
Dakshina Kannada DC Sindhu B. Rupesh had recently convened a high-level meeting of district officials. The main objective of convening the meeting was to ensure that law and order are maintained in the district. Any untoward incident or unrest in the district could leave an impact on the people of the district already battered by the Coronavirus, lockdown, and other developments. In this context, the meeting assumed significance. After the meeting, DC issued two main orders.
One order was against those indulging in ‘illegal, unlawful cattle transport’. ‘In view of Bakrid, slaughterhouse operations should not be run illegally. Stringent action would be taken against those indulging in illegal transport of cows and the killing of cows,’ was the gist of the order.
The other order was against ‘fake cow protectors.’ ‘It is an offence to stop, indulge in brawls, and assault the transportation of cattle. If illegal activities are noticed, police should be informed immediately. Instead, if anyone takes the law into their hands, stringent action would be taken against them,’ the order warned.
The moment the second order was issued, miscreants of the Sangh Parivar vented their ire on social media. They not only criticized the DC but also started hurling several allegations against her and went to the extent of issuing her a life threat. Though the police filed a suo-moto case and arrested the accused, the question is not against the threats to the DC per se but rather about who is responsible for the growth of such miscreants of the Sangh Parivar who openly issue such life threats against the senior-most officer of the district administration for simply asking the people follow the law.
There is no doubt that ‘fake cow protectors’ are extortionists operating in the garb of cow-protectors. These vigilantes have neither reared cows nor hold any sort of an emotional connect with them. This ‘fake cow protection’ is, in fact, proving to be a headache for those who eke out living rearing cows and selling milk, and is not helping anyone.
Many of them face several serious allegations of stopping poor farmers from selling their cattle, threatening and capturing the cattle, and selling them secretly to slaughterhouses and minting money on the pretext of sending them into cattle protection centres. At the same time, they indulge in threatening and seizing cash and mobile from the hapless cattle transporters. Criminal cases are registered against many of them.
Rejected by society as goondas in the past, they are now wearing the fancy dress of ‘cow protectors’ and trying to gain credibility and social acceptance. If the police try to take action against them, they take shelter under religion, culture, and different masks they wear. They are also the foot-soldiers of a political party and have therefore become a huge challenge in the maintenance of law and order. Emboldened by the backing of political leaders, they have now grown to the extent of sending threatening messages through social media to the DC. The DC is not the only one who is responsible for ensuring that miscreants don’t hijack the law and order situation in a district. People’s representatives who have won popular votes are also equally responsible. When the DC tried to protect the law and order and received life threats, the peoples’ representatives should have immediately responded and stood in support of the DC. But through their silence, these representatives indirectly supported the extremists. Ironically, DC was transferred within two days after the orders were issued. People are now suspecting that DC’s commitment to work is perhaps responsible for the unexpected transfer. Does it then mean that political leaders are of the view that law and order need not be maintained in the district? Or does it mean that the responsibility of maintaining law and order has been handed over to these miscreants who are facing criminal charges?
As though to corroborate this, an incident occurred recently in Belthangady taluk. A meeting of police officers convened by Belthangady MLA about preventing cattle lifting and illegal transport of cattle was attended by Sangh Parivar leaders. What was the need for the presence of ‘fake cow protectors’ of Sangha Parivar in the meeting of police officials convened to stop illegal cow transportation? Many of the Sangha Parivar leaders who attended the meeting are facing criminal cases. By inviting them to the meeting and sitting alongside them, the legislator has not only dented the image of the law enforcement agencies but also brought down the morale of the police. If those who are supposed to be in prison sit alongside the police in an official meeting called by the legislator, what is the message that the legislator is sending across? It is similar to giving wolves the role of protecting sheep. These developments expose the way in which the miscreants of Sangh Parivar have an unlawful nexus with the police department in the district. How can we then expect law and order and peace to prevail in Dakshina Kannada? And how can a new DC be expected to act boldly in matters of law and order in the district?
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Barcelona (AP): Real Madrid slapped players Federico Valverde and Aurélien Tchouaméni with half-a-million-euro ($588,000) fines on Friday for their altercation during practice.
The massive fines came a day after the midfielders tussled when the team trained. Valverde said in a post on social media on Thursday that no punches were thrown. But Valverde knocked his head on a table and he suffered a small cut that required a brief hospital visit.
On social media, Valverde initially called it a “meaningless fight” with a teammate and said “everything has been blown out of proportion."
His employers, however, considered it a significant enough breach of team discipline to nail both Valverde and Tchouaméni with fines that bite even the bank account of a top soccer player. The half-a-million euro penalties reflect the reputational damage the club was enduring in a chaotic end to a disappointing season.
In a statement, the 15-time European champion said its disciplinary action was concluded after both players expressed to the club “their complete remorse for what happened and apologized to one another.”
Madrid added they also apologized to their teammates, the coaching staff and club supporters, as well as showing their willingness to accept whatever disciplinary action the club deemed “opportune.”
Tchouaméni was back training with Madrid on Friday, two days before they play at Barcelona in a clasico. Madrid has to win otherwise Barcelona will be crowned La Liga champion.
After being notified of the fine, he posted a public apology to the club and its fans on social media.
“What happened this week in training is unacceptable,” Tchouaméni wrote. "I say this while thinking about the example we are expected to set for young people, whether in football or at school.
“Above all, I am sorry for the image we projected of the club.”
Valverde was not at practice due to the head knock.
Both players are set to play in the World Cup next month, with Tchouaméni playing for France and Valverde for Uruguay.
Chaotic end to a poor season
===================
The run-in between the players, who for seasons have played side by side in Madrid's midfield, came after they argued this week in previous training sessions. But tempers boiled over on Thursday. Spanish media was rife with reports that the players previously disagreed over the club's decision to let coach Xabi Alonso go after just months on the job.
It was not the only altercation involving Madrid players during training this week. Álvaro Carreras confirmed he was in a “minor” incident with a teammate. Spanish media said he and fellow defender Antonio Rüdiger got into a scuffle.
Álvaro Arbeloa, the coach who was promoted from Madrid's reserve team when Alonso was fired in January, will face tough questions on what went wrong inside the changing room when he gives a press conference on Saturday ahead of the clasico at Camp Nou.
Madrid is facing a second consecutive campaign without a major trophy amid rumors in the Spanish media that club president Florentino Pérez is considering bringing back Jose Mourinho to straighten out his underperforming team.
