Arnab: When The Past Catches Up...
The Mumbai Police arrested Republic TV Chief Arnab Goswami on Wednesday. Since his arrest, Delhi’s BJP leaders are crying hoarse over infringement of ‘freedom of expression.’ At the same time, human rights activists who are fighting for freedom of expression are caught in a bind. Through his channel, Goswami has been misusing freedom of expression for several years now. Supporting the anti-people policies of the government and cheating the people through fake news, he has betrayed the principles of journalism. Republic TV lost its reliability long back and has been in the news for all the wrong reasons. But then, it is dangerous to remain silent when a government attacks the head of a media house. As it is, the Centre has attacked the media in different forms all over the country. Several journalists are in jail.
In this context, the nation has to stand with him if his arrest is in violation of freedom of expression. But in this case, the head of Republic TV was not arrested as a fallout of a violation of freedom of expression. How right is it then to protect a famous journalist who is an accused in a criminal case on the pretext of ‘freedom of expression?’ This question has arisen in the Goswami incident. When the government is already attacking the media in different forms, maintaining silence in the Goswami episode could also encourage politicians to launch more attacks against the media.
But, there is no way to term as journalism what Goswami has been practicing over the last few years. Everyone who watches his channel vouches for this. In one way, Goswami has misused freedom of expression in all possible ways and has caused embarrassment to the media. Recently, Goswami was in the news for his involvement in the alleged TRPs scam. He is facing allegations of creating fake TRPs and cheating the people and advertisement agencies. In a way, this is an attack on the principles of journalism. By making people watch his channel to increase TRPs, he cheated the TRP agency. Already, several advertisement agencies have boycotted Republic TV. If investigation had gathered steam, Goswami had to be in jail for falsely boosting TRPs. But, he is now in judicial custody for a case dating back to two years. The cops have acted against Goswami in a criminal case in which he is involved in his personal capacity. A resident of Kavir, Alibagh, interior designer Anvay Naik and his mother Kumuda committed suicide at their home in 2018. Police later revealed that in his death note, Naik had written: “Arnab Goswami and his associates have been harassing me over my dues of Rs 5.40 crore. Under extreme financial duress, I have decided to kill myself.” On the insistence of his family for an investigation, the police have proceeded against Goswami.
Recently in the actor Sushant Singh Raj’s suicide case, the same Republic TV created a furore over the incident. It tried hard to project the actor’s death as a murder. It also tried to connect Sushant Singh’s suicide with the drug mafia. When Goswami could make baseless allegations against people over Sushant Singh’s suicide, it is the duty of the police to investigate the case in which an industrialist has named specific persons in his death note. How fair is it for Goswami to try to protect himself using his identity as a journalist when he has so far consistently worked in favour of politicians using his channel?
In the past, Tarun Tejpal, editor of the most progressive, anti-BJP publication, Tehelka, was imprisoned for sexual harassment against a woman. Then neither progressives nor human rights activists spoke in support of Tejpal because the case was in no way connected to freedom of speech and expression. Society had unequivocally condemned what Tarun Tejpal did intoxicated by a heady mix of money, publicity, and power. In this situation, demanding that Goswami – head of a TV channel that has absolutely no reliability and who has allegedly cheated in a financial matter - should not be arrested for being a journalist is a betrayal of journalism. The family of Naik has appreciated the police for the arrest of Goswami. It is inhuman to not demand justice for Naik’s family when we seek justice for Sushant Singh.
The leaders of the ruling party at the Centre, who have so far assaulted media and journalists in various forms for writing against the government, are now shedding crocodile tears over Goswami’s arrest. But nobody is explaining how freedom of speech/expression has been violated in this case. At the same time, Goswami is facing charges in the fake TRP case which also have to be investigated. If Goswami is proved to be involved in the case, he should not get any leeway for being a journalist. He has to be held accountable for all his misdeeds.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Husband has to equally participate in household chores as he is not marrying a maid: SC
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Friday said a husband has to equally participate in household chores like cooking, cleaning and washing as he is not marrying a maid but a life partner.
The observations came from a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta which was hearing a petition filed by a man challenging an order of the Karnataka High Court.
The high court had set aside a trial court order granting divorce to the man on the ground of cruelty.
During the hearing before the apex court, the counsel appearing for the man said the mediation between the parties had failed.
He said the marriage between the parties took place in May 2017 and since 2019, the couple is separated.
ALSO READ: Four held for throwing non-veg food leftovers near temple
"I (man) want a divorce. The trial court granted a divorce on the ground of cruelty," the counsel said.
The bench asked what the cruelty was as alleged in the matter.
The counsel appearing for the man said the woman had indulged in improper behaviour and was not cooking food.
"You have to equally participate in all these. Cooking, cleaning, washing, everything. Today's times are different," Justice Nath observed, adding the high court was right that it might not be a ground for cruelty.
"You are not marrying a maid. You are marrying a life partner," Justice Mehta observed.
The bench was told that both of them were working in a government school.
"Call both parties physically. We would like to speak to them," the bench said.
It posted the matter for hearing on April 27 and asked both parties to remain present before it.
