Nurturing the false pride of ‘we had this long ago’ is India developing a mindset to destroy everything that we got today? India was on the forefront of technology in the past and had achieved great feats in the field of education through the pages of history, are the ‘neo cultural’ pundits of India turning into a roadblock for India to grow into the future? Education policy is the best example to show how India is on downhill journey with its scientific and rational approach to the future.
The believers of Hindutva are posing a massive challenge to growth of intellectualism, by tampering with the educational policy. The so called upholders of culture, often shed crocodile tears about how the invaders destroyed the Nalanda University way back in 1193. This often finds its way into public speeches that Prime Minister Modi delivers at frequent intervals. His government is working stealthily on destroying the post-independence universities of India.
On one hand this government is working on uprooting the modern universities at the cost of glorifying the historical legacy of the country. All the steps initiated to change the UGC that existed since 1956 into HECU, need to be noted. Immediately after, the yet-to-be set up Jio University sponsored by Mukesh Ambani was given Institute of Excellence, along with six other institutes. These are the biggest mistakes that can turn detrimental for India’s educational future. We need to also know HECU would operate.
The government will have all rights to withdraw the power of any university that disobeys the government diktats. The VCs and management heads of the educational institutions can be subjected to disciplinary action or three years of punishment if they fail to pay heed to the government. UGC had the powers to control the allocation of funds, but in the new body that is being constituted can only keep an eye on quality control, of course, with the prior permission of the government.
HRD ministry will have direct control over the funds that flow to institutes. As per the 1956 Act when the UGC came into existence, at least 50% of the members had to be from outside the government, from fields such as agriculture, forests, medicine or law and so on. But HECI will only have members that are nominated by the government.
It is not as though UGC was without faults, since the Commission had at times allowed practices to be taken up by the Universities that were against the interest of the students on several occasions. For instance, the ever changing syllabus and exam practices of Delhi University had subjected the students to a lot of problems. The university has switched from annual exam to semester system and then back again to annual exam pattern when students retaliated against this.
The UGC had also directed the Delhi University to engage 20 teaching hours over the existing 12 hour teaching time. Do the students have the bandwidth to listen to over 18 hour classes? Have the members or policy makers or politicians even understood how much time it takes to prepare for one hour class?
With all this, the anticipated changes that HECI would bring in, are already mired in problems. This would only help the rich universities that aspire to become top universities, one of those dreams the government is chasing right now. Even the students and teachers will choose such institutes over the others and public money will be given in large parts, including pumping of private funds only to these universities. In this ordeal, colleges and universities with lack of facilities would be sidelined.
As of now, India has 760 universities and 38,498 colleges. Among the 1.56 million students, over 80% are going to degree level classes the ones who opt for higher level of education are just about 0.67% of them. Even when the government is speaking about privatization of education, at least 78% are private institutes. What plans does the government have for these institutes and their students? By creating ‘renowned’ and ‘non-autonomous’ categories, the government is pushing most of them into second grade categories. The government assumes the students have to be controlled, and not be let off to have a liberal mindset.
This is much against the thought of ‘Where the mind is without fear and head is held high; and the knowledge is free…’ The government is trying to put a massive control mechanism over young minds, by attacking the souls of universities. This is worse than whatever was unleashed on the Nalanda university in the annals of history.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Mumbai, Nov 21: Shiv Sena MLA Sanjay Shirsat on Thursday said his party leaders will follow Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde in any direction he goes post-assembly poll results and decisions taken by him will be acceptable to them.
He asserted the party will solidly back Shinde, who heads the Shiv Sena, as it trusts his leadership, comments coming two days ahead of the state assembly poll results.
Asked what if Shinde goes with rival NCP (SP) president Sharad Pawar to become the chief minister for a second time, Shirsat said, "We are committed to (follow) whatever Eknath Shinde decides. We will be solidly with him. We trust him and it will always be there."
The MLA from Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar (West) was responding to the question asked on a TV channel.
Shirsat said Shinde, who took over as CM in June 2022 after revolting against the then leadership of the Shiv Sena, only goes in the "right direction" and this has been the experience of party leaders.
Shirsat was one of the Shiv Sena MLAs who sided with Shinde at the time of the revolt.
Asked about the comments of his ally, BJP leader Pravin Darekar said, "Shirsat's remarks do not reflect the official stance of the party. Eknath Shinde's party contested against Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena (UBT) and Sharad Pawar's NCP (SP). Such an alliance with the MVA was inconceivable."
The BJP, Shinde-led Shiv Sena and NCP headed by deputy CM Ajit Pawar are members of the ruling Mahayuti alliance. On the other hand, the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) consists of the Congress, Shiv Sena (UBT) and NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar).
Asked what if Shinde is not made the CM again if Mahayuti retains power, Shirsat said, "A decision on this will be taken only by Eknath Shinde. It's his right and we cannot even comment on it. Whatever decision Shinde takes will be acceptable to us."
Voting for the 288-member state assembly concluded on November 20 and results will be declared on November 23.