Banks looting consumers
One of the few commendable reforms during former PM Indira Gandhi’s time was nationalization of banks. Only after that bold step, did the banks that had restricted their services to rich, opened their doors to the poor people. When the impoverished went to banks for loans during the ‘loan melas’ that were held as part of that reform, people even mocked that Indira Gandhi was treating banks like her ancestral property. These loan melas were widely criticized and held responsible for the anticipated collapse in economy. But now, one is understanding in true sense as to who is looting the bank and where they are hiding from the public eye, escaping repayment.
If Indira Gandhi nationalized the banks to bring in revolutionary economic reforms while Narendra Modi is conspiring to privatize them. More than anything else, the damage caused by the likes of big borrowers such as Mallya and Modi is going to be met by the hard earned money the general public have invested into the banks.
The financial institutions that existed on the trust of public, today have lost their reputation.
The nation now knows the motive behind note ban was never to find black money. By then, the industrialists who had raised thousands of crores as loan from banks were beginning to leave the country after hoodwinking the system. The banks were almost a sinking ship. The government used note ban as a method to fill the coffers of banks to make up for the damage caused by big borrowers. The ban of widely used Rs 500 currency that was used by common people on a daily basis, turned the lives of people upside down.
The note ban didn’t bring out black money from the lockers of Ambanis and Adanis. No rich man stood in the queue to change his currency or did anyone come to streets because of this sudden decision by the government. The middle class suffered the most. They had to stand in queues to get their own hard earned money. Cottage and rural industries fell flat. People would listen to stories of persons looting banks, but this was the time when banks looted the people and they stood there, watching it unfold, helplessly.
After that, the government used another method to safeguard the interest of banks. Till then, banks worked to serve the people but now people were used to save the banks. Robbing the common persons under different headers became a strategy. Now the banks have put out their figures and this must be the biggest achievement of Narendra Modi government.
More than 21 public sector banks have penalized people who have not maintained minimum balance in their accounts. Three major private banks have collected penalty to the tune of Rs 5000 crore. State Bank of India had restarted the practice of penalizing deposits on reducing balance. All banks put together have been able to collect Rs 4,989 crore from all the customers who didn’t maintain a minimum balance.Half of this amount is the contribution of SBI alone. The same SBI has indirectly waived off the loans of 63 major industrialists including that of Vijay Mallya, stating these were ‘irrecoverable loans’. This is a rather soft term used to indicate loan waiver. Bank has even issued a clarification stating this should not be mistaken as loan waiver. Recovering loans is a massive challenge in our country. Would the banks try hard enough to recover loans that have been set aside as ‘irrecoverable’? If they are going to be recovered, why would they be classified under that header?
Banks are projecting this extortion in the name of penalty of Rs 5000 crore overall for not maintaining minimum balance as their major achievement. Whose money is this? Who are those people who have not been able to afford minimum balance in banks? They cannot be Ambanis, Adanis, Birlas or Tatas for sure. They are the salaried class or even poorer than that who are toiling to make ends meet. The middle class and the lower middle class. They fear the loss of reputation over financial mismanagement. They are not the ones who extracted loans from the banks.
The farmers and labourers who have less idea about banks respect the institution more than misusing it. They do not have any idea about the new rules and regulations since they are almost illiterates and they do not own android phones to receive updates from the banks and understand the gist of it. Their ignorance has turned into a bliss for the banks. SBI deducts penalty even if the minimum balance goes down by a mere Rs 50. What is the fault of the customer? Is he paying the price for trusting the banks? Industrialists like Mallya are enjoying their lives abroad even though they have a loan of thousands of crores they took from Indian banks that rightfully belongs to the people of this country.
Sparing him and penalizing a commoner who hasn’t been able to maintain minimum balance in his account and showing it like an achievement is inhuman to say the least. This shows the desperation and plundering depths of a financial system in the country. The effect of note ban is hardly over, and people are suffering a big blow time and again. People would refer to fly by night finance companies as ‘blade companies’. Looks like banks have successfully replaced them. This also shows where the economic system of the country is headed.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Informing Pakistan ahead of Operation Sindoor was a crime: Rahul Gandhi on Jaishankar's 'admission'
New Delhi, May 17 (PTI): Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Saturday hit out at the government for "informing" Pakistan about targeting terror infrastructure as part of Operation Sindoor, saying it was a crime and asking who had authorised it.
In a post on X, Gandhi questioned External Affairs Minister (EAM) S Jaishankar for publicly admitting that the government of India (GOI) had informed Pakistan of the action and asked how many aircraft the Indian Air Force lost as a result.
"Informing Pakistan at the start of our attack was a crime. EAM has publicly admitted that GOI did it. Who authorised it? How many aircraft did our air force lose as a result?" said Gandhi, the leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha.
He also shared an undated video of Jaishankar saying India had informed Pakistan of the action against terror infrastructure on its soil.
Jaishankar can be heard saying in the video, "At the start of the operation, we had sent a message to Pakistan, saying, 'We are striking at terrorist infrastructure and we are not striking at the military.'"
"So the military has the option of standing out and not interfering in this process. They chose not to take that good advice," the minister can be heard saying in the clip.
The Press Information Bureau (PIB), however, has debunked claims that Jaishankar had said India informed Pakistan ahead of Operation Sindoor. In a post on X, the PIB's Fact Check Unit said the minister had not made any such statement and that he was being misquoted.
Operation Sindoor was the Indian offensive against terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) following the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam.
Informing Pakistan at the start of our attack was a crime.
— Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) May 17, 2025
EAM has publicly admitted that GOI did it.
1. Who authorised it?
2. How many aircraft did our airforce lose as a result? pic.twitter.com/KmawLLf4yW
