Can LokPal work independently?
One of the primary examples of how an agency can curb corruption if it is given an opportunity to work honestly and diligently is Karnataka Lokayukta. Our state Lokayukta commands special respect among such agencies existing all over India. It brought a CM to his knees and forced him to resign over illegal mining case. Many people’s representatives were sent to jail and lost their political clout finally. The whole country looked at Karnataka Lokayukta with awe.
When Lokayukta began its deep probe on politicians, all of them came together to finish it off. They have now clipped its wings and just allowed its existence to work without any hindrance. At a time when govt interferes with investigating agencies costing them their reputation and trust among people, the very first Lokayukta has been appointed in India. This was done after massive movement by people. Since LokPal can investigate the central ministers and leaders, the significance is naturally high. Even BJP had insisted on LokPal appointment when UPA was at the centre. But after clinching power, BJP fell silent over the matter.
Modi government didn’t pay heed to any pleas by Anna Hazare and many others insisting on the setting up of LokPal. But Modi government didn’t pay heed to that till the term was close to being over, and appointed a LokPal now when the govt is facing another term of elections. This shows the level of seriousness of the government regarding LokPal, because this has been done only with the lone purpose of pulling wool over people’s eyes. Corruption may not end with the appointment of LokPal. Considering the example of Karnataka, even this govt has not given total power to Lokayukta. Turning it into a toothless tiger is not a big deal of the politicians make up their minds on that.
For many years, we didn’t have justices to fill the positions of Lokayukta. With Santosh Hegde at the helm of affairs of this agency some time ago, today one wonders whether a Lokayukta even exists in the state. Country has seen how the CBI is suffering. The chief of this investigating agency was kicked out unconstitutionally because he wanted to investigate Rafale deal. Govt did not even pay heed to the SC’s directive regarding this issue. Finally, such a situation was created that the CBI chief had to resign and go out. Having used premier institutes to fulfil its political gains, the Modi government has ruined the credibility of such institutions.
Governments earlier would try to clandestinely try to control CBI and other such agencies, but Modi government has made no such cover-up efforts. Today CBI is full time puppet of the government. Hence the appointment of Lokpal is not a matter to rejoice too much. Because how does one expect LokPal to work independently when we have seen the fate of CBI? This would just be another agency established to add more jewels to their crowns.
LokPal can investigate people’s representatives too. It works as a watchdog of Democracy. If it takes up a case like Rafale, it’s not difficult to imagine how Modi would respond to it. LokPal alone cannot check corruption unless it gets full power. Else it would work like a bonded labour of central government. If this agency gets full power, the first bomb will fall on our political leaders. Why would they even make a mistake that can finish them?
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
US SEC summons Gautam Adani, nephew Sagar in bribery case
New York (PTI): Adani group founder and chairman Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar have been summoned to explain their stand on the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) allegation of paying USD 265 million (Rs 2,200 crore) in bribes to secure lucrative solar power contracts.
Summons have been sent to Adani's Shantivan Farm residence in Ahmedabad and his nephew Sagar's Bodakdev residence in the same city for a reply to SEC within 21 days.
"Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it)...you must serve on the plaintiff (SEC) an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure," said a November 21 notice sent through the New York Eastern District Court.
"If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court," it added.
Gautam Adani, 62, and seven other defendants, including his nephew Sagar, who is a director at the group's renewable energy unit Adani Green Energy Ltd, allegedly agreed to pay about USD 265 million in bribes to Indian government officials between approximately 2020 and 2024 to obtain lucrative solar energy supply contracts on terms that expected to yield USD 2 billion of profit over 20 years, according to an indictment unsealed in a New York court on Wednesday.
Separate from the indictment brought by the US Department of Justice, the US SEC has also charged the two and Cyril Cabanes, an executive of Azure Power Global, for "conduct arising out of a massive bribery scheme".
The ports-to-energy conglomerate has denied the allegations and said it will seek all possible legal resources.
"The Adani Group has always upheld and is steadfastly committed to maintaining the highest standards of governance, transparency and regulatory compliance across all jurisdictions of its operations. We assure our stakeholders, partners and employees that we are a law-abiding organisation fully compliant with all laws."
An indictment in the US is basically a formal written allegation originating with a prosecutor and issued by a grand jury against a party charged with a crime. A person indicted is given formal notice to reply.
That person or persons can then hire a defence lawyer to defend.
Prosecutors said the investigation started in 2022 and found the inquiry obstructed.
They also allege that the Adani Group raised USD 2 billion in loans and bonds, including from US firms, on the backs of false and misleading statements related to the firm's anti-bribery practices and policies, as well as reports of the bribery probe.
"As alleged, the defendants orchestrated an elaborate scheme to bribe Indian government officials to secure contracts worth billions of dollars and... lied about the bribery scheme as they sought to raise capital from U.S. and international investors," US Attorney Breon Peace said in a statement announcing the charges on Wednesday.
"My office is committed to rooting out corruption in the international marketplace and protecting investors from those who seek to enrich themselves at the expense of the integrity of our financial markets."
