Malnutrition is the mother of all diseases. The Centre had admitted that more than 45 percent of the people are suffering from malnutrition in India. In the post-Corona world, India’s future depends on winning the war against malnutrition. The lockdown has had such a lethal impact on the life of the people that malnutrition has doubled along with an increase in unemployment and poverty. Children have become victims of these developments. Though we claim that today’s children are the citizens of the future, we are on the verge of creating a country that is disease prone and unhealthy. With the advent of the Coronavirus, all other diseases have been neglected and this has adversely affected the crores of children.
India has not seen any major achievements in addressing the problem of long-term malnutrition in children. In the 119-country Global Hunger Index, India’s rank has fallen and is now in the 100th position. India’s standing is poor even in children’s nutrition index so much so that a countless number of children have died due to malnutrition in tribal areas.
About 17 percent of the world’s population lives in India and about 25 percent of the global population suffering from hunger are in India. Though India has registered a commendable performance in food production, there has been no substantial improvement in eradicating hunger. United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) published a report in 2017 that portrayed a grim situation. According to this report, about 19.70 crore people or about 14.4 percent of the country’s population is suffering due to the lack of nutrition. The health of a large number of women and children is in a miserable state in the absence of food security and nutrition is critical for women in their teenage years, during pregnancy, and when breastfeeding. Malnutrition has thus a more severe impact on women compared to men.
India that has the highest number of buffalo population is also at the forefront of milk production. It also occupies the second place in the world in the production of vegetables, fruits, and fish. Despite this, the grave reality is that the Body Mass Index (BMI) of one-third of the country’s adult population is below the normal range as they are deprived of adequate food, specifically nutritious food. Every day in India, more than 3000 children are dying due to illnesses related to the poor quality of food. This situation that we face in India is worse than that of several African countries in the Sahara region. The lack of good quality food, poor health care, and consumption, inadequate water supply, lack of hygiene, and deficient health services are responsible for such a situation in the country. A majority of mothers are suffering from anemia and malnutrition. While 33.6 percent of the children in India are suffering from long-term malnutrition, about 55 percent of young children are suffering from anemia. It has been estimated that the country is suffering losses to the tune of Rs 1.5 lakh crore to its gross domestic product due to the problem of anemia that affects the people. This figure is three times more than the health budget of 2017-2018.
The Centre has already implemented two mega national programs to address the issue of malnutrition - Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) and the National Health Mission. But both these programs have failed to reach the common man and have fallen short of their objectives owing to administrative inefficiency and corruption. Studies have shown that about 40 percent of subsidized food is not reaching actual beneficiaries.
NITI Aayog has prepared a draft of a strategy to solve the problem of nutrition before 2030. It has come up with recommendations to reduce malnutrition by 3 percent in children aged below 3 and to reduce anemia among younger children and women in the age group of 15 to 49. But there is no doubt that the present economic slowdown will make it impossible to achieve these objectives. And the Centre, in an attempt to cover up its failures, will push issues such as the statue of Vallabhbhai Patel and Ram Mandir before the people. The future of India is not in temples, mosques, or statues but is dependent on the health of our children. The Centre should at least now wake up to this reality.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Husband has no control over wife's 'stridhan': Supreme Court
New Delhi, Apr 25: A husband has no control over his wife's 'stridhan' (woman's property) and while he may use it during the time of his distress, he has a moral obligation to return it to his wife, the Supreme Court has reiterated while directing a man to pay Rs 25 lakh to a woman in return for her lost gold.
The woman in this case claimed that 89 sovereigns of gold were gifted to her by her family at the time of marriage. Additionally, after the wedding, her father gave a cheque for Rs 2 lakh to her husband.
According to the woman, on the first night of their marriage, the husband took custody of all her jewellery and entrusted the same to his mother under the garb of safekeeping. She alleged that all the jewellery was misappropriated by the husband and his mother to discharge their pre-existing financial liabilities.
The Family Court, in 2011, held that the husband and his mother had indeed misappropriated the appellant's gold jewellery and that she was entitled to recoup the loss caused to her by the said misappropriation.
The Kerala High Court, while partly setting aside the relief granted by the family court, held that the woman had not been able to establish misappropriation of gold jewellery by the husband and his mother.
The woman then moved the Supreme Court against the high court order.
A bench of justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta said 'stridhan' property does not become a joint property of the wife and the husband, and the husband has no title or independent dominion over the property as its owner.
"Properties gifted to a woman before marriage, at the time of marriage or at the time of bidding farewell or thereafter are her stridhan properties. It is her absolute property with all rights to dispose at her own pleasure.
"The husband has no control over her stridhan property. He may use it during the time of his distress but nonetheless he has a moral obligation to restore the same or its value to his wife," the bench said, while referring to an earlier judgment on the issue.
The apex court said matters of matrimony can rarely be said to be simple or straightforward hence, human reaction according to a mechanical timeline before the sacred bond of marriage is severed is not what one would expect.
"Divorce, majorly, in Indian society is still considered a stigma, and any delay in commencement of legal proceedings is quite understandable because of the attempts made to have the disputes and differences resolved; more so, in a case of the present nature, when the appellant was faced with the imminent prospect of termination of her second marriage.
" Even otherwise, the appellant did not present before the Family Court a time barred claim. Doubting the bona fide of the appellant, on facts and in the circumstances, was thus not called for," the bench said.
The top court said the very concept of marriage rests on the inevitable mutual trust of the spouses, which conjugality necessarily involves and to assume that the woman from day one did not trust the husband is rather improbable.
"The High Court, thus, failed to draw the right inference from facts which appear to have been fairly established. That apart, we have neither been shown nor do we know of any binding precedent that for a claim of return of stridhan articles or money equivalent thereof to succeed, the wife has to prove the mode and manner of such acquisition.
"It was not a criminal trial where the chain of circumstances had to be complete and conclusively proved, without any missing link. Undisputedly, the appellant had brought to the matrimonial home sufficient quantum of jewellery, which she wore during the marriage and as is evidenced from photographs," the bench said.
The apex court said the woman had successfully initiated action towards recovery of money in lieu of 89 sovereigns of gold, which in the year 2009 was valued at Rs 8.90 lakh.
"Mere upholding of the decree of the Family Court at this distance of time, without anything more, would bring about injustice to her. Bearing in mind the passage of time, the escalation in cost of living, and in the interest of equity and justice, we deem it fit in exercise of power conferred by Article 142 of the Constitution of India to award to the appellant a sum of Rs 25,00,000," the bench said.
