Eradicate Hunger to be Free of Diseases
This is not the first time that hunger has become newsworthy in India. In post-independent India, though all governments launched a war against hunger, each time hunger won the war. Right from Indira Gandhi’s ‘Garibi Hatao’ to Vajpayee’s ‘Roti Aur Kapda’, political parties have used the promise of hunger eradication for electoral gains. Realizing that it is difficult to mobilize votes around the issue of hunger, the BJP used other emotional issues to reap electoral gains. With political parties understanding that it is easy to win elections by spreading hate instead of distributing food, ‘hunger’ moved to the bottom of the list of priorities of manifestos of political parties. With those claiming to have distributed food to the poor at low prices losing elections and those citing ‘Ram Mandir, Pakistan, Patel statue’ winning elections, governments progressively started reducing funds allocated to the poor.
As a result, the world’s tallest statue has raised its head in the country. Speedy projects are being planned for bullet trains. The foundation stone has been laid to build the Ram Mandir. Preparations are now on to bring to the forefront the controversy around the Krishna temple. All this is being done using the media to make people believe that the country is moving towards becoming a world leader. At the same time, India has performed poorly in the Global Hunger Index (GHI). Last year if India was ranked 102nd in the GHI, this year it has improved its position to the 94th rank. Ironically, neighboring Pakistan is in the 88nd rank. The increase in the number of the hungry people in India has surpassed that in Pakistan. The report has also shown that India’s performance is worse than Bangladesh’s. During the UPA administration, malnutrition rates in India had crossed 45 per cent. Now, under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, hunger continues its unstoppable victory march.
The moment India’s poor performance in GHI was announced, several experts started criticizing the government’s neglect towards malnutrition. And as usual, the government is blaming ‘Coronavirus’ for its failures. But the truth is beyond that. For the last ten years, all government programmes have focused on the rich. With the belief that the prosperity of the corporate sector translates to the prosperity of the country, the government has forgotten that the poor are part of the country’s development. This government has adopted global attention and investments in mega projects as its development criterion. The massive Patel statue and bullet train projects are a part of this agenda to attract global attention. Demonetization, GST, and lockdown have weakened the foundation of the Indian economy. The government’s wrong decisions destroyed rural industries, medium sized industries, and the retail economy. Digitization and Aaadhar card deprived the poor of the welfare benefits provided by the government and it became impossible for some of them even to avail themselves of the Public Distribution System (PDS) food grains. The stories of those who died having been deprived of rationed food as they had no Aadhar card were splashed on the front pages of newspapers. With a faulty and inefficient PDS, the government’s new rules directly affected the poor.
Now, the government is citing the excuse of ‘Coronavirus’ for everything. The government is hiding the fact that hunger has been drastically increasing right from the days of demonetization. Natural calamities and epidemics are not new to the world. If the country had cared for its poor, designed the PDS efficiently, prioritized eradication of hunger, the nation need not have feared the Coronavirus. Even when the country was in a state of shock due to the hunger caused by the lockdown, the food grains in godowns were diverted for the purpose of producing sanitizers instead of reducing hunger. Experts have warned that hunger can trigger other diseases even if the Coronavirus disappears from our midst.
Doctors have already said that the Coronavirus is a disease that can spread to others quickly but it is not a deadly virus. If tuberculosis and Coronavirus diseases are compared, a country like India must fear tuberculosis more. The World Health Organization (WHO) said on Wednesday that the Coronavirus can destroy the country’s progress in the eradication of tuberculosis in the country. The WHO has expressed anguish that countries like India and South Africa that are most impacted by tuberculosis are diverting the funds allocated for tuberculosis for its battle against the Coronavirus. Even if Coronavirus ceases to exist, India’s health problems will not end. In the future, tuberculosis could become a huge problem due to two reasons. One, with the funds allocated for tuberculosis getting diverted to other services, accessing medicines and treatment would become increasingly difficult for those with tuberculosis. Two, with malnutrition the most important contributing factor for tuberculosis, increasing hunger could aggravate the problem of tuberculosis.
In such a situation, the government should change its dual stand with regard to the consumption of beef that has the benefit of offering maximum proteins. People affected due to the lack of food and suffering hunger pangs should have easy access to beef. The rest can be exported. The government’s acceptance of the consumption of beef as an integral part of the food system can lead to the reduction in malnutrition. The criterion for the identification of the poor should change. Comprehensive changes should be made in the distribution of food grains to make sure that food grains reach eligible families instead of letting them rot and consumed by worms in depots. The government should immediately understand that diseases can be won by winning over hunger. Otherwise, forget becoming a world leader, India might become a problem to the world due to the continued spread of diseases such as tuberculosis.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
US vetoes Palestinian bid to gain statehood at the United Nations
United Nations, Apr 19: The US has vetoed a resolution in the UN Security Council on the latest Palestinian bid to be granted full membership of the United Nations, an outcome lauded by Israel but criticised by Palestine as “unfair, immoral, and unjustified".
The 15-nation Council voted on a draft resolution Thursday that would have recommended to the 193-member UN General Assembly “that the State of Palestine be admitted to membership in the United Nations.”
The resolution got 12 votes in its favour, with Switzerland and the UK abstaining and the US casting its veto.
To be adopted, the draft resolution required at least nine Council members voting in its favour, with no vetoes by any of its five permanent members - China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Palestinian attempts for recognition as a full member state began in 2011. Palestine is currently a non-member observer state, a status that was granted in November 2012 by the UN General Assembly.
This status allows Palestine to participate in proceedings of the world body but it cannot vote on resolutions. The only other non-member Observer State at the UN is the Holy See, representing the Vatican.
Israel’s Foreign Minister Israel Katz praised the US for vetoing what he called a “shameful proposal.”
“The proposal to recognise a Palestinian state, more than 6 months after the largest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust and after the sexual crimes and other atrocities committed by Hamas terrorists was a reward for terrorism”, Katz wrote on X, after the US veto.
US Ambassador Robert Wood, Alternative Representative for Special Political Affairs, said in the explanation of the vote at the Security Council meeting on Palestinian membership that Washington continues to strongly support a two-state solution.
“It remains the US view that the most expeditious path toward statehood for the Palestinian people is through direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority with the support of the United States and other partners,” he said.
“This vote does not reflect opposition to Palestinian statehood, but instead is an acknowledgement that it will only come from direct negotiations between the parties.”
Wood said there are “unresolved questions” as to whether Palestine meets the criteria to be considered a State.
“We have long called on the Palestinian Authority to undertake necessary reforms to help establish the attributes of readiness for statehood and note that Hamas - a terrorist organisation - is currently exerting power and influence in Gaza, an integral part of the state envisioned in this resolution,” he said, adding that “For these reasons, the United States voted “no” on this Security Council resolution.”
Wood noted that since the October 7 attacks last year against Israel by Hamas, US President Joe Biden has been clear that sustainable peace in the region can only be achieved through a two-state solution, with Israel’s security guaranteed.
"There is no other path that guarantees Israel’s security and future as a democratic Jewish state. There is no other path that guarantees Palestinians can live in peace and with dignity in a state of their own. And there is no other path that leads to regional integration between Israel and all its Arab neighbours, including Saudi Arabia,” he said.
The Palestinian Authority President, Mahmoud Abbas, sharply criticised the US veto, saying that it was “unfair, immoral, and unjustified, and defies the will of the international community, which strongly supports the State of Palestine obtaining full membership in the United Nations.”
Riyad Mansour, Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine, said that “our right to self-determination has never once been subject to bargaining or negotiation.
“Our right to self-determination is a natural right, a historic right, a legal right. A right to live in our homeland Palestine as an independent state that is free and that is sovereign. Our right to self-determination is inalienable...,” he said.
Getting emotional and choking up as he made the remarks, Mansour said that a majority of the Council members “have risen to the level of this historic moment” and have stood “on the side of justice, freedom and hope.”
He asserted that Palestine’s admission as a full member of the UN is an “investment in peace.”
On April 2, 2024, Palestine again sent a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres requesting that its application for full UN membership be considered again.
For a State to be granted full UN membership, its application must be approved both by the Security Council and the General Assembly, where a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting is required for the State to be admitted as a full member.
Earlier in the day, Guterres, in his remarks to a Council meeting on the Middle East, warned that the region is on a “knife edge”.
“Recent escalations make it even more important to support good-faith efforts to find lasting peace between Israel and a fully independent, viable and sovereign Palestinian state,” Guterres said.
“Failure to make progress towards a two-state solution will only increase volatility and risk for hundreds of millions of people across the region, who will continue to live under the constant threat of violence,” he said.
The UN, citing the Ministry of Health in Gaza, said that between October 7 last year and April 17, at least 33,899 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza and 76,664 Palestinians injured. Over 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals, including 33 children, have been killed in Israel, the vast majority on October 7.
As of April 17, Israeli authorities estimate that 133 Israelis and foreign nationals remain captive in Gaza, including fatalities whose bodies are withheld.
