Excess food needs to reach the hungry
Hunger is the basic urge granted by nature to humankind. But humans have turned it into some sort of disease generating process. As a result of insatiable hunger, lakhs of people are dying all over the world.
A lot of people are struggling with malnourishment and underdevelopment aided illnesses, hanging between life and death. The earth, which is the most enriched creation of god, is filled with impoverishment despite the rich resources it has.
None of the poverty or hunger was created by god. Man’s greed has to do with every shortage of resources we face today. And humans alone are accountable to find solutions for that. India isn’t lagging behind in creating hunger and perpetuating it further. As per reports, more than 14.9% population of the country is malnourished.
Which means, more than half of malnourished people are in our country. And most of them don’t even know if they would get the next meal or not. Reports reveal more than 20 crore people go to bed hungry. Many accounts of hunger deaths have been reported in 2018. This bitter truth is always masked with sweet lies or hollow promises. Global Hunger Index 2018 pus India in 103rd place among the 119 countries that made to the list.
But the true picture, apart from the beautiful fakes projected by the media, is very different from the ones we are served.
This is the proof to the fact that when it comes to common people, not everything is in order. Why is India, that enjoys nature’s bounty, facing such a difficult situation when it comes to hunger? Experts have already opined that unfair distribution of resources is the main reason for the prevailing hunger in India, and not excess population as commonly assumed.
China which took the step of controlling population in order to reduce poverty, is also facing this mammoth task of having to tend to the aged, who are increasing in number with every passing day. Now that country has completely withdrawn from one child policy. We need to honestly think about harnessing population, assuming that being the most priced resource to aid progress.
We also need to accept the fact that we have failed in controlling poverty. In order to celebrate our short success, we cannot allow the poor to die unattended. Though we may not be able to solve the issue of poverty in complete sense, we can certainly work towards protecting the poor.
We may not be able to build palaces for the homeless, but we can certainly provide them a safe place to stay or a roof on their heads. We may not be able increase the standard of their life, but we can most certainly solve some of their problems.
We may not be able to provide them multi-course meals, but we can ensure they don’t go to bed hungry. We are not facing food scarcity. As per the reports, India produces enough to feed her people, but the failure lies in distribution of this food.Our resources are getting divided unequally and unjustifiably.
We are also wasting a lot of food. On one hand, we have people dying of hunger, and on the other, huge quantity of food is reaching the waste basket. As per an estimate, more than one third of the food produced is being wasted annually. Inefficient packing and supply methods contribute to 40% fruits and vegetables getting wasted before they reach the consumers. More than 30% grains turn unfit for consumption.
Prevailing methods of processing and supply chains contribute to wastage of paddy and other food grains. Fully ripen fruits are discarded with the anticipation that they’d rot even before they reach the destination. Vegetables and food items meet the same fate.
All these rejected items turn into a big part of ‘wastage’ which can be taken to the poor and hungry. Our marriages, occasions where we serve food, events, restaurants, lodges, hotels and homes waste a lot of food. Marriages see a lot of food wastage with varieties of items being served to those who discard mercilessly because they are not hungry, but are only tasting the food there. As a result, a lot of food lands in the waste bin.
One of the best chefs in the world, Massimo Bottura of Italian origin, has come up with a new idea. He has created a collective called Food for Soul. This organization ensures the food that is excess, is taken to the poor and hungry instead of landing in waste bins. This way he is saving food as well as the people.
A ‘food bank’ can serve well for our people who reach the brink of life owing to hunger and malnourishment. If that is done, India will save its face and the country can do better than watch people die of hunger.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Bengaluru (PTI): Justice B V Nagarathna of the Supreme Court on Saturday called for the creation of a judicial reforms commission to reduce mounting pendency in the courts, saying systemic incentives across stakeholders were contributing to delays in justice delivery.
She was speaking at the Supreme Court Bar Association's (SCBA) first National Conference on the theme "Reimagining judicial governance: strengthening institutions for democratic justice" here.
Nagarathna, who was part of the panel session addressing "From Pendency to Prompt Justice: Rethinking Justice Delivery in Indian Courts," said, this reforms commission must have membership not only from the judiciary of the Supreme Court, the High Court, as well as the District judiciary, but also have members from the Bar, Attorney General, Solicitor General, and also certain members representing the Bar at the institutional level, such as the Bar President, and from the government side to enable an inter-institutional dialogue on reducing pendency.
She reflected that, from the point of view of various stakeholders, a litigant gains from the status quo, to proceed to prolong proceedings.
ALSO READ: A political legacy, but no win yet: Padmaja Venugopal''s new fight in Thrissur
"A lawyer or an advocate loves adjournments and postponement because he/she benefits from per appearance and extended timelines. A government department reduces bureaucratic risk by appealing rather than accepting defeat.
"A judge, and particularly a trial judge, is always acting with caution because he/she is confronted with appellate reversal, and therefore he/she prefers procedural caution rather than having an aggressive docket control. Each of these decisions is individually rational, but how does it help the system? It is only leading to systemic delay," she added.
In order to break this equilibrium, Justice Nagarathna said that what is required is institutional interventions through a judicial commission to reduce pendency, rather than merely exhorting better conduct from judges, adherence to procedural timelines, asking advocates not to seek adjournments, urging the government to reduce litigation, or expecting courts to function round the clock and judges not to take leave.
On pendency, the judge questioned the inclusion of defective filings in court statistics, suggesting that such cases should not be counted until they are procedurally ready for hearing.
She also underlined the role of the government as the "largest generator of litigation", noting that officials tend to file appeals to avoid scrutiny, even in cases where disputes could be settled earlier. This, she said, results in cases travelling through multiple judicial levels unnecessarily.
"The government publicly expresses concern about judicial backlog, while simultaneously feeding that backlog through relentless litigation," she observed.
Justice Nagarathna further claimed judicial capacity is constrained by inadequate public investment, including delays in appointment of judges, lack of infrastructure and insufficient use of technology.
Among the measures suggested, she called for improved case management, curbs on unnecessary adjournments, adoption of technology, prioritisation of cases, promotion of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and creation of specialised benches.
She also urged advocates to adhere to professional and ethical standards, litigants to avoid frivolous appeals, and the government to adopt a practical litigation policy and ensure timely funding and appointments in the judiciary.
