Goons and murderers represent the country!
‘Violence in the name of Gau Raksha is intolerable!’ ‘States must ensure these incidents do not occur.’ ‘Do not link religion with the victims of such crimes’
The very next day after the Supreme Court said made these significant comments, a union minister has publicly felicitated a person accused of lynching another person, using the cover of Gau Raksha. Forget about protecting the country against violence in the name of Gau Raksha, the government itself is openly supporting them for whatever their worth. Do the words of Supreme Court even matter here? The act of this minister, is much like the mockery of all that SC said so far against Gau Raksha. Or, the government and Supreme Court are hand-in-glove with each other, while offering tacit support to the criminals to continue with their act of killing people.
A person was lynched in Jharkhand for carrying beef in his car. This was an act of communal violence because the person wasn’t carrying ANY meat in his car, let alone beef. The eight persons who did him to death, have a host of criminal cases riding on them. Totally 12 people have been accused of killing this person and 11 have been convicted for their crimes. Now eight of the accused have been released on bail by Jharkhand court. All the accused have been felicitated by union minister Jayant Sinha. And none of the other ministers have found this act objectionable, thus offering their indirect support to the act. Jayant Sinha is the son of Yashwant Sinha. And he has not hesitated from showering his appreciation to a lynchmob.
On one hand SC says Gau Rakshaks have to be controlled by the state and on the other, a minister felicitates them. Does this make sense at all? Can the BJP government ever dare to take action against fake Gau Rakshaks when they are shielded by ministers? Only the minister’s father Yashwant Sinha has taken serious objection to this act. The ruling by the SC does not make sense at all at the ground level.
What is the message a minister gives when he garlands a lynchmob fresh after they get out of the jail? If they were achievers such as scientists, writers or thinkers, the society would think they are role models. If a farmer who has achieved great feat at dairy farming and minister achieves them, there is a point in felicitating him. He would be projected as a fit role model for the others to emulate. This would also be a means of inspiration and employee generation for the others.
Today, the steps taken by the central government have been consistently destroying the industries everywhere. And the minister has shown the youth how to be inspiring to others, by way of felicitating a lynch mob. With this, he has shown that Gau Raksha is a way of murdering someone and still be honoured for it. He has sent a very significant message to the youth about where their priorities should be. This way, he has said when one is a Gau Rakshak, all the crimes in normal parlance are considered achievements per se. Earlier, stealing or mugging would be considered terrible offences both socially and legally. People would ostracized if they involved themselves in those crimes. Politicians would keep them at an arm’s length. But today, these aspects are considered as major achievements.
The politicians would love to have them close to themselves unmindful of the implications this would have on their social image. The act of minister could have been ignored if the accused were cleared of their charges after a trail. But that is not to be. A political party has publicized that people from particular crime background are members of their own party. So, what’s the point in SC stating the victims shouldn’t be seen as those from one particular religion.
The only agenda of Gau Rakshaks is to create fear in the minds of people from a particular community and ensure minds are flared when they want to whip up violence. And a particular political party is the beneficiary of all this fear being played up. Hence the minister has been open enough to felicitate the accused so openly.
If the SC is indeed serious about controlling crime, it has to first ensure the message reaches the central government first. It has to direct the central government to put a check on such incidents, making it an equal partner in perpetuation of the crime. And the court should take steps to ban the Gau Raksha outfits. Else, soon enough, this country may be a sitting duck for murders, lynching and mugging for its main culture and this would happen sooner than we all can even realize!
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Farooq Abdullah backed Article 370 abrogation, claims Former RAW Chief A.S. Dulat
Srinagar: In a political bombshell, former RAW chief A.S. Dulat has alleged that National Conference (NC) president and former J&K Chief Minister Dr. Farooq Abdullah privately supported the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. The claim, made in Dulat's new book “The Chief Minister and The Spy – An Unlikely Friendship”, has sparked a political storm and could potentially impact the Abdullah family's long-standing legacy in Kashmir.
Dulat stated that he was informally asked by the Modi-led central government to reach out to Abdullah, who was under house arrest at the time. According to him, Abdullah’s release came with two unspoken conditions: refraining from criticizing the abrogation and avoiding any reference to Pakistan. “Farooq was wise enough to grasp the message,” Dulat alleged.
He further claimed that Abdullah had shown willingness to cooperate with the Centre and allegedly remarked that the NC could have passed the proposal in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly—had they been consulted.
The Abdullah family, which has dominated Kashmiri politics since Sheikh Abdullah’s era, has publicly opposed the 2019 constitutional move. The new allegations stand in stark contrast to the party’s stated stance and its later efforts to restore the special status through the Gupkar Alliance.
Sajad Gani Lone, president of the Peoples Conference, said he was not surprised, calling Dulat Abdullah’s “alter ego.” He alleged that the NC’s public opposition masked private cooperation with Delhi. “The 2019 meeting between Farooq and the PM was no mystery,” he wrote on X, suggesting the party’s electoral success in 2024 was a reward for earlier cooperation.
PDP leader Iltija Mufti accused Abdullah of helping to “normalise the gutting of J&K’s constitution,” alleging he chose to stay politically relevant in Kashmir rather than resist in Parliament.
National Conference spokesperson Tanvir Sadiq categorically denied the claims, dismissing the book as a “figment of imagination.” He highlighted contradictions in Dulat’s account, noting that Farooq formed the People’s Alliance for Gupkar Declaration (PAGD) after his release to challenge the abrogation.
Sadiq also recalled that Dulat’s earlier book had made controversial claims about other leaders. “This is just another attempt to stay relevant,” he said.
While the National Conference has yet to release an official statement, Dulat’s claims have added a new layer of controversy to Kashmir’s political discourse, raising fresh questions about the behind-the-scenes developments surrounding the revocation of Article 370.
