Immutable shall fall; dynamic shall survive
The politics of statue that's happening in India isn't limited to this country alone, but has spread to some other nations as well. The proof of this lies in the fact that the incidents around Mahatma Gandhi's statue in Ghana are getting complex with every passing day. Giving in to pressure by a few professors, the statue of M K Gandhi was ripped out from the University campus. This is almost the same politics that's getting a lot of attention in India as well.
The whole country knows why Patel statue was erected in Gujarat. BJP wants to fight the memories of Nehru with Patel as a combat strategy. Their idea that they can erase the memories and contribution of Nehru by way of erecting a statue of another leader itself is a very narrow thinking. Patel is a leader within India. But Nehru grew up to be an international leader. His non-alignment movement gave rise to third front in the world. Having slipped up big time in ushering development, the BJP is trying to dissuade people by building statues of Patel, Shivaji, Lord Ram and others.
Even in destroying the statue of Gandhi in Ghana there are populist and appeasement politics. The statue was removed to please a section of people in Ghana telling them that Gandhi was a racist and racism supporting individual. As per the general public of Ghana, Gandhi's stances on issues are not any different from those who are imperialistic racists. Just the way as there are people who like him and dislike him in our country, the same kind of people exist elsewhere too. While one finds that RSS hates Gandhi, there are Ambedkarites who dislike him vehemently too. Because Gandhi had supported casteism and defended something as inhuman as carrying human waste. At the same time, one cannot reject the values of truth, non-violence and simplicity that he reintroduced to the country through his life. Gandhi statue was opposed in the past too in Africa. In 2015, Gandhi statue was smeared with white paint in South Africa, and this has continued till recently by way of aborting the bid to erect Gandhi statue in Malawi.
The political leaders of Ghana succumbed to people's demand and tore off the statue of Gandhi in Ghana. But there is a sensitive issue here. This statue was erected as a mark of good diplomatic relations between the dual countries. This was to commemorate the three nation tour that the president of India undertook in 2016. The statue was just a metaphor for two nations to express their good diplomatic relationship. India and South Africa often take the softer route to express their diplomatic relations. When situation gets out of control, the same statues turn into pawns of diplomatic rigmarole and solutions at the hands of people. The same thing has now transpired in Ghana. With Gandhi statue being razed to the ground, it also made way to a complicated dimension being added to the relationship between the two countries.
If people of that nation feel Gandhi indeed was a racist, they have all the rights to bring down his statue. But then when forging diplomatic relations, the impact of erecting any statue, on the people of the country has to be taken into consideration by the nations involved. A statue is not merely a token between two diplomats and the nations they represent; but an indicator of how the impact would roll out should things go on an undesirable plane anytime later. Statues are not pertinent for any bilateral relations. There are more ways of achieving this goal than erecting statues. When people choose immobile metaphors like statues, the future naturally will have more challenges than the past.
Another example for this would be of the statue of Manu before the Rajasthan High Court. The Dalits and Shudras of this country have been fighting against the ideology and prejudices proposed by Manu that have been dominating the discourse since ages. Freedom for this country was not just about chasing out the British but also to disregard the Manu ideologies wholly so as to achieve some dignity. Constitution took the place of Manu's ideologies. Unfortunately, right infront of the High Court in Rajasthan, his statue has been erected. The dalits and shudras have been expressing their displeasure regarding this since quite some time now. When the high of Hindutva sobers down, the statue may even be gone. If a Dalit headed government ever comes to power in Rajasthan, they may pull this statue down just to please their own people. This statue is a challenge to those who trust the Constitution.
To solidify the thoughts of leaders in the form of statues is a bad precedence. A hero today may be a villain tomorrow. Then a statue does not take long to be torn down. We can take the example of Lenin statue that was torn down in Tripura in the recent times. We can even guess the statues that would be destroyed if a left government assumes power in Tripura again. The lifeless statues can never create a feeling of solidarity. They can be detrimental to unity sometimes. Hence any government should stop using resources to erect statues. That money should be spent on creating public facilities to be used by general public. The words of sharanas that the immobile shall fall and the dynamic shall survive, should be remembered at this stage.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Arnab Goswami’s Homecoming? Anchor tears into Modi Government over aviation chaos
Says, govt not going to be happy with us saying this
New Delhi: In a striking turn that surprised even his regular viewers, Arnab Goswami spent the evening of December 4 taking direct aim at the central government over the ongoing crisis in the domestic aviation sector. The debate, aired on Republic, focused entirely on the severe disruption caused by IndiGo flight cancellations and the state of air travel in the country. The tone was sharp, emotional, and openly critical, raising the larger question of whether this marks a homecoming of sorts for the anchor long accused by critics of being soft on the government.
Goswami began the show by saying the central government had “completely let down” air passengers. He pointed to chaotic visuals from airports in Pune, Ahmedabad and Mumbai, describing passengers packed into crowded spaces, long queues, and travellers lying on the floor with little access to basic facilities. He said anyone travelling with children or elderly parents would understand the distress such situations cause.
According to him, the government often claims to have improved the aviation sector, but the day-to-day experience of passengers tells a different story. He argued that whatever help the government may have extended has benefited individuals and individual companies, not the sector as a whole.
Goswami highlighted data from the last three days, saying IndiGo had canceled 1,232 flights in November. He broke down the reasons for the cancellations: 755 linked to crew and FDTL constraints, 258 due to airspace and airport restrictions, 92 because of failures in air traffic control systems, 127 for other reasons.
He said passengers in India are often “taken for granted” and that only in this country can such large-scale cancellations take place without consequences.
Throughout the debate, Goswami repeatedly returned to the theme of duopoly. He said Air India and IndiGo together control 91.5 percent of the aviation market, leaving only a small share for others like Akasa and SpiceJet. This, he said, gives the two big players the power to decide prices and escape accountability.
“They can set the prices. They can torture passengers. They can be not answerable for air crashes.” He added.
Goswami also questioned why such a structure is allowed to exist if the government claims it opposes monopolies. He asked whether the government has made Air India accountable after the recent air crash, and said he did not believe so.
“We are told that the Modi government does not like monopolies. First of all, I don't agree with that. There are too many monopolies happening.” He said.
The anchor accused Air India of operating aircraft that were not airworthy and said no serious action followed. According to him, any other minister in charge of civil aviation would have been removed after such incidents, but nothing happened.
“He is not answerable. And why is the central government not bothered about it? Because he comes from the TDP, an alliance party. So let him do,” he said.
He added that Air India continues to seek government support, including compensation for losses after the Sindhur episode. Goswami questioned why public money should be used to support the airline, drawing a comparison with the earlier controversy involving Vijay Mallya seeking help from the Manmohan Singh government a move that was labelled as scam.
Goswami said passengers are suffering because of delayed flights, sudden cancellations, and lack of compensation. He criticised the DGCA, saying it was not enforcing safety and operational norms. He also questioned why the Prime Minister’s Office had not intervened.
He noted that Republic had carried multiple exposés on these issues and claimed that Air India chooses to give interviews and advertisements only to other channels.
He also called for Parliament to debate the aviation mess and examine whether monopolies or duopolies should be allowed in a nation of India’s size.
“I'm sure the government's not going to be happy with us saying this, but someone's got to speak up for the people of this country.” He added.
Known by his critics as the “Godi Media Chief”, Goswami’s direct attack on the Modi government over civil aviation raised eyebrows across media circles.
Whether this is a one-off outburst or a sign of a new editorial direction is something viewers will be watching closely.
#AviationCollapse | India’s aviation sector is in turmoil as IndiGo’s mass cancellations and Air India’s alleged safety lapses leave passengers stranded. The disruption raises serious questions about airline management, regulatory oversight, and who is ultimately responsible for… pic.twitter.com/Dqt6pcoW8w
— Republic (@republic) December 4, 2025
