Is population contributing to India’s poverty?
Recently, the industrialist and self-proclaimed godman Baba Ramdev said those with more than two children should be denied rights to vote. We are living in times where people speak about things that never relate to them. Politicians speak about science and sanyasis speak about economics. Baba Ramdev’s talk is the continuation of such trend.
According to him, increased population has contributed to the poverty of the country. This is an old theory. A country like China is facing an acute problem of deluge of aged persons owing to one child policy. Hence, the family planning policy has taken a backseat now.
In a country like India, population is a resource, and people are not suffering owing to the lack of it. Instead, the concentration of financial resources owing to Ambani, Adani, Ramdev etc has led to the country’s majority population living in poverty.
If he is really serious about poverty, Ramdev should talk about improper sharing of resources where the wealth lies in the hands of some rich people. That would suit the perspective of a sadhu such as Ramdev. But, Ramdev being an industrialist, he has amassed huge amount of wealth and resources to himself. Expecting him to speak on even distribution of resources is really foolish.
Are we really a poor country? Last year, an additional Rs 2200 crore worth property was amassed by the crorepatis of the country. While the one percent rich category increased its wealth by 39%, that population in the lowest order of hierarchy saw an increase of only three percent. This is according to the Oxfam report.
Since 2004, the poorest of the poor which is about 10% or 13.6 crore Indians, are still reeling under debts. While the poor struggle to feed their children and buy them medicines, a few affluent people are usurping the resources of the country. This leads to widespread anger, as Winnie Byanyima – the Oxfam International Executive Director.
She has even cautioned that this aversive uneven distribution of resources can cause serious damage to social and democratic setup of the country.
But unfortunately, people like Baba Ramdev are pointing fingers at increasing population and trying to slip out of their role in contributing to the concentration of wealth. About 10% of India’s population holds 77.4% wealth of the nation. The richest of the rich, in the top order has 51.53% of the national wealth. The 60% of the lower strata of the population holds just 4.8% of the national wealth.
About nine richest persons in India hold wealth that is equivalent to 50% of the wealth distributed among people from the lowest strata. Between 2018 and 22, the country will produce about 70 new crorepatis. With them, the number of poor will also increase. The report has said the governments often contribute to this menace by reducing the budgetary allocation to health and education of the poor, and reduce the taxes for the rich while increasing the cap on loans doled out to them. This leads to the widening of the gulf between the rich and the poor. Last year about 18 new crorepatis entered the list of privileged rich in the country.
India now has 119 crorepatis. The estimated value of their total assets stands at 400 billion dollars (Rs 28,00,000 crore)
This has been the highest annual increase in the last decade since 2008, with wealth in 2018 increasing up to $ 440.1 bn from $ 325.5 bn in 2017.
By increasing a mere 0.5% of taxes on the assets of the rich, India can cover nearly 50% of the budgetary allocation by the government for health. But then these are high hopes since the corporate forces are the ones that are running the government. So them allowing this hike in taxes is a very far thought.
The corporates are fleeing from the country after fleecing the Indian banks which hold the money saved by the middle class with their hard earnings. The country is busy hiking the tax limit for the middle class instead of taxing the rich. If only the resources concentrated among the few rich is disseminated among the poor, the picture would be different. The population should be turned into human resource. Instead of that, a self-proclaimed god man speaking against the unborn children would be the highest form of hypocrisy.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
AIITA welcomes Karnataka’s ban on obscene songs in school events
Bhatkal: The Karnataka unit of the All India Ideal Teachers Association (AIITA) has welcomed the Karnataka government’s decision to strictly ban school children from dancing to obscene songs during educational and cultural programmes in government, aided, and private schools across the state.
AIITA Karnataka State President M. R. Manvi congratulated the government for taking what he termed an important step to preserve the sanctity of education.
“Such decisions to safeguard the dignity of school children and uphold the values of education are the need of the hour. This rule should not be limited to government schools alone but must be strictly implemented in all private educational institutions as well,” he said.
He further urged the government to address other concerns within school programmes.
“The government should not only prohibit obscene dances in the name of school anniversaries, but also ensure that plays and dialogues that incite religious hatred are avoided. Schools should be centres of harmony, not platforms for spreading hatred,” he added.
According to a recent circular issued by the Department of School Education and Literacy, obscene dances are adversely affecting the mental health and moral values of students.
In this regard, schools have been advised to use songs that promote nationalism, positive thinking, the greatness of Kannada culture, and value-based traditions instead of inappropriate content during programmes.
The circular also emphasises that students should be dressed in decent attire.
AIITA also backed the department’s warning that disciplinary action would be taken against head teachers if such guidelines are violated. The association has further demanded that district Deputy Directors of Public Instruction strictly monitor the implementation of these rules.
