It’s freedom to police lathis
Courts has been issuing directions time and again to bring in reforms into police department. But common people have been losing trust in the system with every passing day. Custody deaths would turn into questions of efficiency of the police, and the media would report police brutality as and when they happened. But now, the police have adopted a soft approach towards Sangh Parivar goondas and other rowdies, in some ways encouraging them to carry out their activities.
There are charges against the police that they entrust their difficult jobs into the hands of rowdies. Finest example of this can be seen in instances of mob lynching cases that occur with the aid of police. With this, the reforms initiated by the government have reached another level altogether. And this has created fear in people’s minds that the entire police department is going through a phase that will leave it incorrigible.
India has a very dark history of custody deaths and the incidents that lead to that. And how many culprits have been held in such cases is something that needs to be studied with great interest. There are proper policies that indicate how the police should treat the accused and the crime. They are accountable at every step. The Supreme Court suggested reforms that need to be made in 2006. But the state and central governments have ignored it. As a result, the police department is setting out to be an alternative to courts, and the government itself.
The reforms suggested by the SC reflects the reports submitted by the National Police Commissions and many benches and committees headed by judges and high profile police officers. With this suggestion of reforms, it was assumed that the lackadaisical approach the system has about police department was about to change. But that seems to have met with a disappointment now. Central and State governments implemented it the way they deemed fit, or completely ignored it.
Since the steps suggested by the Supreme Court could reduce the control of state governments on the department, none of them are interested in implementing it. If the court had ordered for the monitored implementation of the directions issued, the situation would have been much better.
Many committee reports have placed their recommendations before the Supreme Court. There is a suggestion to bring a new law in place of the police act of 1861. There are also suggestions to reduce interference by state government on transfers and promotions, and appointments. Investigation department has to be left independent. Along with this, there is also a recommendation to separate implementation section, another unit to hear the grievances against the police and other things.
There is a need to bring in good and positive change into the system to ensure people’s faith on police increases with time and every positive step. A report on the status of police department in the country, brought out in 2018 had thrown light on aspects of increase in crime rate, cases that were resolved through intervention of courts and police, and the presence of people from diverse backgrounds in the police force, basic infrastructure, data relating to prisons, rate of resolution of cases relating to SC/ST women and children etc.
The report says there is a lot left to be done as far as case resolution of other minority communities are concerned. The bias exhibited by police is much dependent on the caste or background of the accused. Then there are also gender, caste and faith that aid to stereotypes as well. Muslims nurse fear against the whole system.
Hence the court has to take the responsibility of reforming the police department on its own shoulders and ensure the implementation of the suggestions made in 2006 report. The states that do not implement this have to be held accountable and penalized. These days the department is joining hands with anti-societal forces and has reached some secret pact with the perpetrators.
Politicians are using the police department as per their whims. Before the police department turns into a wing of Sangh Parivar, the court should ensure the reforms are brought in. Else, people would believe only the lathis and shoes of the police have achieved the freedom.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Sambhal violence orchestrated by BJP, govt to divert attention from poll rigging: Akhilesh Yadav
Lucknow (PTI): Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav on Sunday alleged the violence in Uttar Pradesh's Sambhal district over the survey of a mosque was "orchestrated" by the BJP, the government and the administration "to divert attention from electoral malpractice".
Police used tear gas and "minor force" in the face of stone pelting by locals in Sambhal on Sunday as tension escalated during a second survey of the Mughal-era mosque, claimed to be originally the site of an ancient Hindu temple.
Ten people have been detained and a probe was launched into the violence, an official said.
Tension has been brewing in Sambhal over the past few days after the Jama Masjid was surveyed last Tuesday on the orders of a local court following a petition that claimed that a Harihar temple stood at the site.
A day after the Uttar Pradesh bypoll results were declared and the Samajwadi Party managed to win just two seats while the BJP and its ally RLD bagged the other seven, Yadav levelled serious allegations against the police and administration.
"A serious incident occurred in Sambhal. A survey team was deliberately sent in the morning to disrupt discussions about the elections. The intention was to create chaos so that no debate on election issues could happen," the Samajwadi Party chief claimed.
Citing reports, he said several people were injured in the violence in Sambhal and asked when a survey of the mosque was already done, why was a new survey conducted again and "that too in the morning and without preparation?"
"I don't want to go into the legal or procedural aspects, but the other side was not even heard. This was intentionally done to provoke emotions and avoid discussions on election rigging," Yadav said.
"What happened in Sambhal was orchestrated by the BJP, the government and the administration to divert attention from electoral malpractices," the former UP chief minister alleged.
Asserting that in democracy, true victory comes from the people, not the system, he said, "The new democracy created by the BJP ensures that people cannot vote while the system dominates."
He added that whenever an impartial investigation takes place, and the truth comes out through booth recordings and CCTV footage, it will be evident that "voters did not cast their votes and someone else became the voter inside the booth".
Yadav claimed that on the polling day, the police and the administration removed the Samajwadi Party's almost all booth agents and many supporters who wanted to vote.
"If voters were prevented from voting, then who cast the votes? If Samajwadi Party votes didn't reach those booths and our candidate didn't get support, then who voted there? This is a serious issue," he said.
"Additionally, there were two types of slips, -- one with a red mark and another regular slip. We raised this issue on the voting day itself, stating that the administration had created such arrangements, leading to discrimination," Yadav alleged.
The Samajwadi Party's candidate for the Kundarki assembly bypoll Haji Rizwan too has alleged that his supporters were prevented from voting.
The BJP's Ramveer Singh won the bypoll in the Kundarki seat by a margin of over 1.45 lakh votes.
