The country is besieged by a host of issues that need immediate attention. China is waiting to strike at the border. The spectre of a war is looming large. The country has been defeated in the Corona war and finds itself exhausted. The lockdown has not only destroyed the country’s economy but also left people struggling with issues of life and death. The country’s democracy is also in danger. Hundreds of social activists are in jail and those who are not are being threatened through various investigating agencies. The lives of the Right to Information activists are also in a similar state. In this critical situation that the country finds itself in, the media is trying to create a frenzy around a fake person called ‘Kangana’ and trying to mislead the people. 

Having pathetically failed to highlight the plight of migrant laborers who are resorting to suicide, farmers who are losing their land, women who are falling victims to marauding rapists, innocents who are being brutally killed by lynching mobs, the media has tried to project Kangana’s puerile outpourings as the voice of the country. Kangana is a talented actor but is also an ordinary citizen of the country who falls under the ambit of law. Other than the fact that she has amassed a lot of wealth as an actor, her contribution to the country is zilch. Actors such as Amir Khan and Sonu Sood have expended substantial amounts for the poor and have contributed extensively for different causes through their non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Kangana doesn’t seem to have displayed any such generosity. She has been in the news mostly for her skimpy dresses and for consuming drugs, both on and off screen. And now she is trying to take mileage out of the death of the young actor Sushant Singh. The moment she alleged that Sushant who killed himself was a victim of groupism in Bollywood, she became the ‘Mother India’ for BJP. 

It appears that BJP needs Kangana now as the acting skills of their leaders is on the wane. No wonder they are considering Bollywood as a country and Kangana as ‘Bharath Matha’. For Kangana, the moment Mumbai officials raised questions about her illegal buildings, Mumbai started appearing as ‘Pakistan Occupied Kashmir’ (POK).  The BJP jumped to her support just because Maharashtra is ruled by an alliance of its political rivals led by Shiv Sena. Instead of initiating legal action against her, the BJP Government at the Centre went to the extent of  providing Kangana with special security. 

Demolishing illegal structures is not new to the country and there is no such rule that structures belonging to film actors and actresses should not be demolished. In the past, the Maharashtra government demolished illegal structures belonging to popular actors such as Shahrukh Khan and others. Then, nobody complained against the government or the country. The affected people might have gone to the courts against the government’s actions as that is their only recourse in a democracy. But, it appears that Kangana Ranaut considers herself as ‘Rani Lakshmibai’. Her behavior shows that she wants the country to protect her illegal building as though it were to be the memorial of Lakshmibai. In her enthusiasm to criticize the government, she has insulted not only Mumbai but also the entire country. 

Some time ago, when intolerance and violence increased, Aamir Khan had expressed his anguish and BJP and Sangh Parivar leaders immediately turned their ire against him. But now, when Kangana is abusing Mumbai because her illegal building was demolished, BJP leaders are cajoling her as though she is a toddler. Constructing a building illegally is a crime and abusing a government that acted against it is a bigger crime. The BJP’s attempt to project Kangana as its leader despite the fact that she has committed such blunders shows the political bankruptcy of the party.  

The attitude of Kangana, who so far has not expressed any concern about public issues, to criticise the country the moment her illegalities are questioned is most reprehensible. The way the media laps up her statements such as the one attributing Bollywood director Karan Johar as being responsible for the present state of the country is nothing but a mockery of truth. Kangana’s silly outbursts are being projected in a loud voice only to cover up India’s struggles with its problems. Kangana should get her issues with the government about the demolition of her property resolved in a court of law.

The economy has been destroyed using the ‘lockdown’ bulldozer. In this situation, the government should introspect and rush to the relief of the people. It should allow the CBI to investigate Sushant Singh’s suicide and pay attention to the suicide of thousands of labourers. An 80-year-old women was raped in Delhi. In Uttar Pradesh, a dalit girl was raped and killed in a horrifying manner. Let the government take action to protect the lives of such ill-fated women who truly represent Mother India. Similarly, by issuing an appropriate message to the Chinese soldiers who provoke Mother India in the border, let the government send out a warning to the forces that challenge the sovereignty of the country. It is high time the government puts an end to its futile attempts to hide the country’s actual problems by projecting the ‘fake doll’ that is Kangana.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Friday said a husband has to equally participate in household chores like cooking, cleaning and washing as he is not marrying a maid but a life partner.

The observations came from a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta which was hearing a petition filed by a man challenging an order of the Karnataka High Court.

The high court had set aside a trial court order granting divorce to the man on the ground of cruelty.

During the hearing before the apex court, the counsel appearing for the man said the mediation between the parties had failed.

He said the marriage between the parties took place in May 2017 and since 2019, the couple is separated.

ALSO READ:  Four held for throwing non-veg food leftovers near temple

"I (man) want a divorce. The trial court granted a divorce on the ground of cruelty," the counsel said.

The bench asked what the cruelty was as alleged in the matter.

The counsel appearing for the man said the woman had indulged in improper behaviour and was not cooking food.

"You have to equally participate in all these. Cooking, cleaning, washing, everything. Today's times are different," Justice Nath observed, adding the high court was right that it might not be a ground for cruelty.

"You are not marrying a maid. You are marrying a life partner," Justice Mehta observed.

The bench was told that both of them were working in a government school.

"Call both parties physically. We would like to speak to them," the bench said.

It posted the matter for hearing on April 27 and asked both parties to remain present before it.