Kashmir: Cozy partnership snaps off
It hasn’t been too long since United Nations cautioned India against the violation of human rights in Jammu and Kashmir, stating India and Pakistan together were engaged in quashing the human rights of the people of the valley. UN had expressed inclination to probe these cases. Though India had refuted the charges against itself, the fact that India was cautioned by UN is a blot on the country’s image. This is the result of having tried to tame the tiger of a PDP and BJP coalition in Jammu and Kashmir.PDP has always assumed soft stance towards the separatists. That party declared Afzal Guru as a martyr, and have always been open about their preferences towards separatists. BJP entering into a coalition with this party itself was a bad precedence. This meant that BJP joined hands with separatists, by taking their side. More than anything else, RSS and Sangh Parivar began to interfere with people’s impressions about the valley and its politics. They began to scratch old wounds and blood began to ooze out.
Rightists spoke of ghettoization of Kashmiri Pandits, and banning cow slaughter and such emotionally manipulative things. This contributed greatly towards increasing the magnitude of fears and hurt Kashmir was already experiencing. More than anything else, citizens of Kashmir who came out to protest were deemed as extremists. The government tried to build a negative public opinion against everything that was happening here. The deployment of pellet guns against protesting civilians became a topic of discussion at international level. Killing of Burhan Wani, didn’t go down too well and sent tempers flaring in Kashmir. It was the first time that the massive support began to pour out in support of an extremist. Extremists used the fact that a civilian being tied as human shield to police jeep, much to their advantage and to build a public opinion against the ruling dispensation. The government failed to identify the difference between disobedient civilians and extremists.
BJP never tried to get to the pulse of Kashmir, instead the party tried to generalize the whole problem by making statements such as the stone-pelting civilians were doing so since they were paid for it by detractors. More than this, the party also tried defending demonetization saying the step had brought down stone-pelting incidents in Kashmir. This had an impact on local businesses too. People, mainly the youth lost jobs. Extremists and trouble makers began drawing the jobless youth towards them. But by the time the central government realized what fiasco it had created, things had gone so beyond control that the United Nations took cognizance of the matter and even addressed it in a meeting. By this time, BJP and PDP had realized they had to restrategise their coalition.
PDP didn’t want to speak against separatists, let along acting against them. The party couldn’t take a stance against police and army meting out assaults against civilians in the area. The Kathua incident laid bare the discontentment PDP nursed against BJP. The rape of a 9 year old child by members of Hindu organisations, to ‘teach a lesson to her community’ earned international shame for the nation and held mirror to inhumanity in Kashmir. In the meantime, Sangh Parivar members took out a rally in support of the culprits when they were arrested. PDP insisted that two of the BJP MLAs who were also ministers who supported this rally must be thrown out of the government. This caused great embarrassment to BJP. After this, PDP made no bones about its differences of opinion with its ally. BJP also felt peace won’t return to the valley with its force exerting tactics. This ceasefire was also one of strategies government adopted to bring some peace into the area.
Though BJP has differences of opinion on this matter, its attempt to engage with the extremists may send wrong signals. BJP fears the opposition backlash if it decides to hold talks with the separatists. Hence having known neither force, nor talks can ensure peace in Kashmir, BJP decided to withdraw the support unable to ride the tiger of coalition. This is also to ensure BJP goes to Lok Sabha polls cleaner than before. Now both partners have parted ways with Kathua case as the pretext. The divorce is through. But a bad precedence has been set about Kashmir at international level. United Nations has already trained its eyes on Kashmir over human rights violation. Unless people wholeheartedly accept India as home, it is impossible to ensure Kashmir’s unflinching integrity towards India. The political parties need to understand this simple truth.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
US lawmakers seek clarity over financial burden, human cost, endgame in Iran conflict
Washington: Tensions rose at the US Capitol on Tuesday as lawmakers sought clearer answers from the Trump administration on the objectives, duration and costs of the ongoing military campaign against Iran, even as preparations advanced for votes aimed at curbing the president’s war powers.
Senior officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, briefed members of the House and Senate for a second consecutive day behind closed doors, as reported by the Associated Press. The sessions came ahead of votes on war powers resolutions that would limit President Donald Trump’s authority to continue joint US-Israel operations without congressional approval.
Rubio told reporters that the president acted to prevent Iran from striking first. He rejected suggestions that Washington moved only because Israel was poised to launch its own offensive, saying instead that Trump believed the weekend presented a rare opportunity to act with maximum impact. “There is no way in the world that this terroristic regime was going to get nuclear weapons, not under Donald Trump’s watch,” Rubio said.
ALSO READ: BLR airport sees 34 int'l flight cancellations amid Middle East crisis
The conflict has widened following US and Israeli airstrikes on February 28 that killed Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Iran has since launched missile attacks targeting US military bases in the region. At least six American service personnel have died so far.
The administration has indicated that supplemental funding may be required to sustain operations. It added that the concerns among lawmakers about the financial burden and potential for a prolonged engagement has disrupted legislative business, sharpening political divisions at the start of a competitive midterm election cycle.
Associated Press cited Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer’s concerns about what he described as possible “mission creep.” Senator Angus King questioned whether the United States had been drawn into war at Israel’s urging, while Senator Elizabeth Warren asked how the campaign aligned with Trump’s “America First” pledge to avoid extended foreign conflicts.
Defence official Elbridge Colby told senators the president had directed the military to degrade Iran’s missile capabilities and prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons, stressing that the objective was not nation-building. Trump, speaking separately from the Oval Office, dismissed claims that Israel had forced his decision and suggested the conflict could continue if necessary. He has not ruled out deploying US ground troops.
Senator Richard Blumenthal was quoted by Associated Press as saying that he feared the possibility of American boots on the ground while Republican Senator Markwayne Mullin defended the operation, saying the president had acted decisively.
Uncertainty over Iran’s future leadership has added to concerns, with questions mounting about who might succeed Khamenei as Trump rejected the idea of backing Reza Pahlavi, the exiled crown prince of Iran’s former monarchy. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the future of Iran should be determined by its people and House Speaker Mike Johnson said the United States would not engage in nation-building.
Lawmakers from both parties also reported a surge in calls from constituents seeking assistance for Americans attempting to leave the region as hostilities intensify.
The US Constitution grants Congress the right to declare war, however presidents have routinely begun military activities without formal declarations. Both houses are anticipated to vote on proposals that would require explicit congressional approval to continue operations. Some members have also argued that if constraints are not imposed, Congress should consider issuing an Authorization for the Use of Military Force to put lawmakers on the record.
Associated Press quoted House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries questioning the rationale for the campaign and saying there would be strong support among Democrats for the resolution. Johnson, however, warned that restricting the president during active combat could pose risks.
