Kashmir quagmire: Dual stance leads nowhere
Central government has announced ceasefire during the month of Ramzan against Kashmir extremists. Home minister Rajnath Singh had referred to the preparedness of central government to engage in talks provided the Hurriyat conference gave its concurrence to find solution to Kashmir problem. Though the issue has mellowed down for the time being, the instigating talks by BJP leaders is doing more harm than good. Rajyasabha member D P Vatsa stating those pelting stones at defence forces in Kashmir must be shot dead, has created a furore. This could add more complexities to Kashmir problem that’s already in a quagmire.
According to the statement made by Home Minister Rajnath Singh in the Parliament, about 39,918 people have been killed in Kashmir in incidents of violence between 1990 and 2011. But the separatists believe the actual number is more than double of what’s on the record. Government told the parliament that 13,224 people and 5,369 members from armed forces have been killed in various incidents of violence. Though state and central governments underwent a change during this time in Kashmir, the violence relating to the region has never come down, and innocents are paying the price with their lives.
After announcing ceasefire, Rajnath Singh visited Srinagar on June 8 and took stock of response pattern and preparedness of security forces. He instructed the officers to withdraw cases against minors held for pelting stones. Accordingly cases against 530 boys has been withdrawn. While the home minister is trying to bring situation under control, his other colleagues are instigating the situation for worse.
Whatever it is, only talks alone can solve the problem of Kashmir. Joint Hurriyat Leadership too has exhibited its willingness to participate in the talks with the government of India. At the same time, the leadership has sought our government to clear air on a few topics. Though the extremists did attempt to create problems, things seems to be under control now. But the recent statements by some few BJP leaders can create a situation of disharmony.
Central government needs to take people into its trust circles, even before engaging with the Hurriyat. The government needs to clear the air in people’s mind regarding their safety. Owing to some impulsive decisions made by Modi four years ago when he occupied the PM chair, people of Kashmir are in great problems. Women and children have also taken to streets to pelt stones and make their unhappiness known to the authorities.
Some off-the-top decisions regarding safety and security as initiated by the new government has created massive issues especially for women and children. Youths are attracted to illegal and anti-government activities. Central govt needs to engage them with great forthcoming attitude to get their attention.
Central govt needs to assure to people of Kashmir that they wouldn’t choose the same violent path to control the mobs, including absolute dropping use of pellet guns against protesting women and children. A conducive atmosphere needs to be created by releasing leaders such as Shabeer Shah, assuring total inquiry into incidents of firing undertaken by armed forces.
Ministers contradicting home minister Rajnath Singh must be strictly told to stay off the issue and not to issue any media statement since this is not helping the cause. The government must show total commitment to resolving Kashmir issue through talks and discussions.
The BJP led govt had appointed Intelligence chief Dineshwar Sharma as intermediary last year. Mr Sharma has said: Unless the violence is contained and people’s consensus is collected, there would be no use to any discussions on this issue. His statement clearly shows the lopsided approach governments have taken to sort out the issue. Central government needs to draw up innovative plans to engage the youths who are increasingly getting drawn to extremist activities. Hence defence forces need to engage in bringing down the violence than taking decisions that further deepen the damage.
Home Minister Rajnath Singh could have given even more concrete assurances of ceasefire in order to encourage positivity and talks between government and separatists. Negative approach or aggression will not provide any solution to Kashmir problem, ever. Union government’s ceasefire in Ramzan month is the most appropriate gesture. If this positive reinforcement is continued, the people of that region may even come around to sit down and talk with the government and being part of it. If clarity is not reached, this issue may continue to exist for a few more years.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
US lawmakers seek clarity over financial burden, human cost, endgame in Iran conflict
Washington: Tensions rose at the US Capitol on Tuesday as lawmakers sought clearer answers from the Trump administration on the objectives, duration and costs of the ongoing military campaign against Iran, even as preparations advanced for votes aimed at curbing the president’s war powers.
Senior officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, briefed members of the House and Senate for a second consecutive day behind closed doors, as reported by the Associated Press. The sessions came ahead of votes on war powers resolutions that would limit President Donald Trump’s authority to continue joint US-Israel operations without congressional approval.
Rubio told reporters that the president acted to prevent Iran from striking first. He rejected suggestions that Washington moved only because Israel was poised to launch its own offensive, saying instead that Trump believed the weekend presented a rare opportunity to act with maximum impact. “There is no way in the world that this terroristic regime was going to get nuclear weapons, not under Donald Trump’s watch,” Rubio said.
ALSO READ: BLR airport sees 34 int'l flight cancellations amid Middle East crisis
The conflict has widened following US and Israeli airstrikes on February 28 that killed Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Iran has since launched missile attacks targeting US military bases in the region. At least six American service personnel have died so far.
The administration has indicated that supplemental funding may be required to sustain operations. It added that the concerns among lawmakers about the financial burden and potential for a prolonged engagement has disrupted legislative business, sharpening political divisions at the start of a competitive midterm election cycle.
Associated Press cited Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer’s concerns about what he described as possible “mission creep.” Senator Angus King questioned whether the United States had been drawn into war at Israel’s urging, while Senator Elizabeth Warren asked how the campaign aligned with Trump’s “America First” pledge to avoid extended foreign conflicts.
Defence official Elbridge Colby told senators the president had directed the military to degrade Iran’s missile capabilities and prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons, stressing that the objective was not nation-building. Trump, speaking separately from the Oval Office, dismissed claims that Israel had forced his decision and suggested the conflict could continue if necessary. He has not ruled out deploying US ground troops.
Senator Richard Blumenthal was quoted by Associated Press as saying that he feared the possibility of American boots on the ground while Republican Senator Markwayne Mullin defended the operation, saying the president had acted decisively.
Uncertainty over Iran’s future leadership has added to concerns, with questions mounting about who might succeed Khamenei as Trump rejected the idea of backing Reza Pahlavi, the exiled crown prince of Iran’s former monarchy. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the future of Iran should be determined by its people and House Speaker Mike Johnson said the United States would not engage in nation-building.
Lawmakers from both parties also reported a surge in calls from constituents seeking assistance for Americans attempting to leave the region as hostilities intensify.
The US Constitution grants Congress the right to declare war, however presidents have routinely begun military activities without formal declarations. Both houses are anticipated to vote on proposals that would require explicit congressional approval to continue operations. Some members have also argued that if constraints are not imposed, Congress should consider issuing an Authorization for the Use of Military Force to put lawmakers on the record.
Associated Press quoted House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries questioning the rationale for the campaign and saying there would be strong support among Democrats for the resolution. Johnson, however, warned that restricting the president during active combat could pose risks.
