Lecturer bribing a rowdy-sheeter to get VC’s post is a University’s shame
This seems absurd. A lecturer pays a bribe to get the top post of a university, an institution responsible for shaping our society. And who does he bribe? A rowdy-sheeter who is involved in several criminal cases. The recent incident in which the lecturer of a science department paid a bribe of Rs 17 lakh to rowdy sheeter Prasad Attavar to occupy the top post in his university has come under the scanner and is being discussed extensively. The accused has already been arrested but people are confused about who should be condemned. A rowdy sheeter’s job is to accept bribes and extort money from the gullible. As is his wont, he cheated this lecturer as well.
More than this, the most alarming aspect is the fact that a lecturer who has to mould the future citizens and become a role model attempted to occupy the top-most post in a university by bribing a rowdy-sheeter. This rowdy-sheeter does not only have a criminal background but is also notorious for disturbing the peace and harmony in the name of religion. The fact that a lecturer has such criminals as his friends is itself questionable but society should be more concerned that this lecturer tried to purchase the vice-chancellor’s post. Renowned thinker Dr. Nagaraj writes: “The way politicians view officials with suspicion, we need to look at teachers also with suspicion.” Society does not suspect lecturers the way it suspects politicians, officials, or journalists.
Of late, doctors are also facing criticism and are being attacked by the public. But society still regards teachers with a lot of respect and believes that they will take society forward in the right direction. But now the situation has changed. Like politicians, officials, seers, lecturers are also becoming dangerous. Society seems to have adopted a lenient stand towards lecturers who don’t appear dangerous unlike politicians or police officials who wield unbridled power. But today, lecturers and teachers are successfully sowing seeds of intolerance and divisiveness among students in colleges and schools. Students who are on the threshold of entering public life with an open mind are being prepared to imbibe the seeds of hatred sown by politicians. Sangha Parivar and RSS leaders are entering schools and are teaching small children hatred in the name of patriotism and teachers are silently supporting them. The number of teachers and lecturers who are teaching RSS’s caste politics instead of teaching children secular values is increasing.
Many a time, lecturers are mere puppets who inevitably agree with everything politicians say fearing harassment, transfers, and other everyday struggles. The recent incident in Kokkada is an excellent example. A headmaster had to face the ire of a Sangh Parivar leader who attacked him for sending children for mid-day meals at the inauguration of a local mosque. In an audio clip that went viral, the headmaster was heard apologizing before the Sangh Parivar leader and defending the acts of Sangh Parivar. This reveals how criminals along with the education department are trying to mislead the society. We are living in a society in which teachers who have to guide and correct the rotten apples in society are in fact agreeing with them and tendering apologies. And politicians are directly responsible for this. Such criminals have now become a bridge between politicians and society.
During elections, party workers with criminal antecedents are sought to create fear, indulge in arson, and mar the peace and harmony of society. Post elections, politicians have to give in to the demand of these elements. Usually, police and teachers use these mediators as a bridge with politicians for their transfers and promotions. In the same vein, the common man fears that if they are antagonised, they would be incurring the displeasure of politicians as well.
The reason why the Ramsene leader was bribed for the vice-chancellor’s post is that he was seen or identified with several politicians. Offering bribe to obtain a lucrative posting is a criminal act. Depending on a criminal to obtain a top-post in a university is a shame on the values for which a university stands for. The incident also shows the depths to which universities have sunk. If such criminals control educational institutions, what can the country expect of students who learn at these institutions? If lecturers go after criminals and politicians, what then will be the situation of students? The arrested criminal should be investigated about how many more people he has cheated. Universities must be made free of criminal connection and politics, and the dignity of these hallow portals of education upheld.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Husband has to equally participate in household chores as he is not marrying a maid: SC
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Friday said a husband has to equally participate in household chores like cooking, cleaning and washing as he is not marrying a maid but a life partner.
The observations came from a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta which was hearing a petition filed by a man challenging an order of the Karnataka High Court.
The high court had set aside a trial court order granting divorce to the man on the ground of cruelty.
During the hearing before the apex court, the counsel appearing for the man said the mediation between the parties had failed.
He said the marriage between the parties took place in May 2017 and since 2019, the couple is separated.
ALSO READ: Four held for throwing non-veg food leftovers near temple
"I (man) want a divorce. The trial court granted a divorce on the ground of cruelty," the counsel said.
The bench asked what the cruelty was as alleged in the matter.
The counsel appearing for the man said the woman had indulged in improper behaviour and was not cooking food.
"You have to equally participate in all these. Cooking, cleaning, washing, everything. Today's times are different," Justice Nath observed, adding the high court was right that it might not be a ground for cruelty.
"You are not marrying a maid. You are marrying a life partner," Justice Mehta observed.
The bench was told that both of them were working in a government school.
"Call both parties physically. We would like to speak to them," the bench said.
It posted the matter for hearing on April 27 and asked both parties to remain present before it.
