Misuse of investigative agencies highly condemnable
Minister D K Shivakumar’s political journey rests on his money power more than his community backing. Leaders like him are a strong combination of caste and money. And all through their political life, they’d always be in the eye of storm and controversies. This is the whole reason why he was not the first choice of being part of the primary cabinet of CM Kumaraswamy. But DKS was successful in conveying to his chiefs within Congress that he is the most inevitable person within the party and hence he should be accorded good position in the cabinet. With his money power, DKS has managed to turn quite a few things in his favour. And naturally enough, he is also being ‘most sought after’ in his own party and as a favourite catch for IT department. It is also more than evident that he would be under radar for his business interests and political acumen.
Having said that, DKS does not play his politics away from his detractors. But then, if he claims ‘innocence’ in his transactions, it would be more than tough to believe. However, the overall credibility of Income Tax department comes under magnifying glass when raids are repeatedly conducted on DKS’s premises, his men and friends all along. Why are the IT department officials not even touching the Reddy brothers who have minted massive amounts of money? Yeddyurappa and Eshwarappa too, have had more than their share of wealth when it comes to charging some with corruption. When truth is this stark, why only Cong leaders are being targeted? Does it mean BJP does not have corrupt politicians?
Is this what the central government wants to convey? BJP is using every possible opportunity to put Cong down through use of all forces and ensure no BJP man is touched in the meantime, no matter how corrupt he/she is.
There is a direct link between the repeated raids on DKS and the Rajya Sabha election that Ahmed Patel won in Gujarat last year. DKS played a prominent role in ensuring no Cong MLA detracts to the other side (BJP) since the election was a very crucial one. This caused a massive loss of face for BJP on its own home turf. More than Ahmed Patel reaching the RS and ensuring Cong did not suffer a sorry defeat in Gujarat; DKS established himself as a leader beyond doubt. He is the man Friday for Congress. From then on, IT raids have been part and parcel of DKS’s political journey. There are accusations that central government tried to convey ‘offers’ to Gujarat MLAs in Karnataka during RS election time. It is more than evident as to why raids have been selectively carried out against DKS since then. Unconfirmed reports said crores worth money was seized from DKS’s house.
Now again, IT raids have begun with a specific agenda of diminishing the image of DKS. Without him, the coalition government was a tough proposition. Without him, the government would have lost a lot of resources and crucial time in forging the coalition. If not for DKS, BJP knows it could have clinched the power and assumed office in the state. Hence DKS continues to be in the eye of storm. As of now, Congress is reeling under money crunch, while BJP has become very strong on that front. DKS is the strongest of politicians, economy wise, within the Congress. Hence, if he can be razed, Cong will find it tough to stand up back again. This is the calculation of BJP leaders. Hence they wanted to buy Cong or JD(S) leaders through horse trading to make a government soon after the results were declared. By then Cong had made the first move.
If Operation Lotus was to repeat, BJP should have spent more than Rs 50 cr on each MLA and would have had to get assurances from at least 10 MLAs to form the government. DKS toppled all these plans with his masterstroke and hence he is an asset to Cong, and a bone of contention to BJP. The credibility of CBI is under radar since no other politicians have been touched across partylines, including those Reddys within BJP who are facing massive corruption charges.
Central government is using every investigative agency to prove something or the other and get MLAs/ministers entangled in legal hurdle for a long time to come. But the victims being victims, they cry victimhood to their otherwise easy life. These raids may even help build a good image for DKS, for he has been the most troubled among the lot. But in the meantime, risking credibility of investigative agencies may prove to be a big risk for the BJP.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
US lawmakers seek clarity over financial burden, human cost, endgame in Iran conflict
Washington: Tensions rose at the US Capitol on Tuesday as lawmakers sought clearer answers from the Trump administration on the objectives, duration and costs of the ongoing military campaign against Iran, even as preparations advanced for votes aimed at curbing the president’s war powers.
Senior officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, briefed members of the House and Senate for a second consecutive day behind closed doors, as reported by the Associated Press. The sessions came ahead of votes on war powers resolutions that would limit President Donald Trump’s authority to continue joint US-Israel operations without congressional approval.
Rubio told reporters that the president acted to prevent Iran from striking first. He rejected suggestions that Washington moved only because Israel was poised to launch its own offensive, saying instead that Trump believed the weekend presented a rare opportunity to act with maximum impact. “There is no way in the world that this terroristic regime was going to get nuclear weapons, not under Donald Trump’s watch,” Rubio said.
ALSO READ: BLR airport sees 34 int'l flight cancellations amid Middle East crisis
The conflict has widened following US and Israeli airstrikes on February 28 that killed Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Iran has since launched missile attacks targeting US military bases in the region. At least six American service personnel have died so far.
The administration has indicated that supplemental funding may be required to sustain operations. It added that the concerns among lawmakers about the financial burden and potential for a prolonged engagement has disrupted legislative business, sharpening political divisions at the start of a competitive midterm election cycle.
Associated Press cited Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer’s concerns about what he described as possible “mission creep.” Senator Angus King questioned whether the United States had been drawn into war at Israel’s urging, while Senator Elizabeth Warren asked how the campaign aligned with Trump’s “America First” pledge to avoid extended foreign conflicts.
Defence official Elbridge Colby told senators the president had directed the military to degrade Iran’s missile capabilities and prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons, stressing that the objective was not nation-building. Trump, speaking separately from the Oval Office, dismissed claims that Israel had forced his decision and suggested the conflict could continue if necessary. He has not ruled out deploying US ground troops.
Senator Richard Blumenthal was quoted by Associated Press as saying that he feared the possibility of American boots on the ground while Republican Senator Markwayne Mullin defended the operation, saying the president had acted decisively.
Uncertainty over Iran’s future leadership has added to concerns, with questions mounting about who might succeed Khamenei as Trump rejected the idea of backing Reza Pahlavi, the exiled crown prince of Iran’s former monarchy. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the future of Iran should be determined by its people and House Speaker Mike Johnson said the United States would not engage in nation-building.
Lawmakers from both parties also reported a surge in calls from constituents seeking assistance for Americans attempting to leave the region as hostilities intensify.
The US Constitution grants Congress the right to declare war, however presidents have routinely begun military activities without formal declarations. Both houses are anticipated to vote on proposals that would require explicit congressional approval to continue operations. Some members have also argued that if constraints are not imposed, Congress should consider issuing an Authorization for the Use of Military Force to put lawmakers on the record.
Associated Press quoted House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries questioning the rationale for the campaign and saying there would be strong support among Democrats for the resolution. Johnson, however, warned that restricting the president during active combat could pose risks.
