Just at the time when criticism is flowing in from all corners about the currency ban that gave a massive jolt to Indian economy, Finance minister Arun Jaitley is attempting to escape from the responsibility that he should own in this. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had clearly said the intention of note ban was to unearth the black money that the illegal hoarders had in their possession. But as per the report given by the RBI, black money has not been unearthed at all through this. More than 99% currency notes have been returned into banking system.
PM Modi who addressed the nation to announce the note ban in a rather melodramatic manner, will now have to come before the same people to explain the pros and cons of his decision. Instead of explaining this, Modi is escaping from his accountability to the public on this topic. Though the finance minister did give an explanation, his words do not answer the question that’s looming large. Jaitley has come up with a whole new reasoning to demonetization. He says it was done to make sure more people came under tax bracket making India a tax-adhering nation. Then does that mean there is no black money in the country? Where did the ‘assumed’ black money go? Can this failure not be attributed to the government? PM Modi had said terrorism in Kashmir would come down with note ban, but the situation is now totally contrary to this. Extremists are now assaulting the police and army more than ever before.
Modi then jumped another goal post that digitalization of cash was the main intention behind demonetization. The app ‘BHIM’ released by Modi for this purpose has fallen flat. Does increased ‘tax collection’ mean you tie the middle class down to cough up taxes? Banks are literally fleecing the middle class with various charges now to make good for their loss suffered through this phase. Banks are trying to stay afloat by making people pay for the losses the former have incurred through non-refundable loans. Those who robbed thousands of crores from banks are leading luxurious lives abroad. Banks are now running on the bulk of ‘penalty’ charges they have collected from the poor and middle class. Is this is progress, then why are taxes being collected? A nation is its people. If financial institutions play around with their hard earned money to show their ‘collections’ how can this even be seen as progress?
Note ban dealt a heavy blow to poor and middle class people. Small and medium industries could never recover from that assault. Agriculture sector suffered massive losses too. Economic health of the nation was damaged. People could never confidently spend money like they did before. Small traders were left without help. More than 60% of this country lives through small traders. Note ban literally stifled any possibility of business in small shops. Super bazaars reaped the benefits of this. This made the rich richer and the poor poorer. Ones who bought rice in small shops were forced to get a card and buy rice at big malls.
Note ban divided the country into two nations, between the haves and have nots. The ones that could reap the benefits of ‘digital india’ thrived and the ones that couldn’t cross over this divide, fell out of Modi’s dream of ‘development’. Those who possessed costly mobiles and had pan cards and other bank cards had their lives secured through this divide of note ban that was created. Those who didn’t know any of this, were left behind. The GDP of India fell owing to less participation from grassroots level. Rupee has been losing a battle against dollar at an alarming pace. There was an unprecedented increase in unemployment. Violence increased after note ban. Jobless youths donned the guise of Gau Rakshaks and moral police. Malnutrition and poverty increased in rural areas.
The image of India was lost at global level. India entered a very precarious phase after note ban. Having ignored all this, Jaitley is speaking about improved tax collection to indicate a finance minister could well be a dangerous cop who ensures people pay their taxes. More than anything else, Modi should have the courage to speak of consequences of note ban before people. Where did the black money, as claimed by them, go? Why were the officers not able to track it? People lost lives owing to note ban but mega corporate companies have reaped its benefits. What was the benefit that was passed on to common people? Why are the oil rates continuously increasing? What are the ways to boost the affected middle level and rural industries? How can general people improve their financial stability after this?
Modi owes the people of this nation an answer as to what losses they suffered owing to note ban. This cannot be dodged by arresting activists who question the government. A broken mirror turns into multiple mirrors. Modi should never forget this truth.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Lucknow (PTI): Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav on Sunday alleged the violence in Uttar Pradesh's Sambhal district over the survey of a mosque was "orchestrated" by the BJP, the government and the administration "to divert attention from electoral malpractice".
Police used tear gas and "minor force" in the face of stone pelting by locals in Sambhal on Sunday as tension escalated during a second survey of the Mughal-era mosque, claimed to be originally the site of an ancient Hindu temple.
Ten people have been detained and a probe was launched into the violence, an official said.
Tension has been brewing in Sambhal over the past few days after the Jama Masjid was surveyed last Tuesday on the orders of a local court following a petition that claimed that a Harihar temple stood at the site.
A day after the Uttar Pradesh bypoll results were declared and the Samajwadi Party managed to win just two seats while the BJP and its ally RLD bagged the other seven, Yadav levelled serious allegations against the police and administration.
"A serious incident occurred in Sambhal. A survey team was deliberately sent in the morning to disrupt discussions about the elections. The intention was to create chaos so that no debate on election issues could happen," the Samajwadi Party chief claimed.
Citing reports, he said several people were injured in the violence in Sambhal and asked when a survey of the mosque was already done, why was a new survey conducted again and "that too in the morning and without preparation?"
"I don't want to go into the legal or procedural aspects, but the other side was not even heard. This was intentionally done to provoke emotions and avoid discussions on election rigging," Yadav said.
"What happened in Sambhal was orchestrated by the BJP, the government and the administration to divert attention from electoral malpractices," the former UP chief minister alleged.
Asserting that in democracy, true victory comes from the people, not the system, he said, "The new democracy created by the BJP ensures that people cannot vote while the system dominates."
He added that whenever an impartial investigation takes place, and the truth comes out through booth recordings and CCTV footage, it will be evident that "voters did not cast their votes and someone else became the voter inside the booth".
Yadav claimed that on the polling day, the police and the administration removed the Samajwadi Party's almost all booth agents and many supporters who wanted to vote.
"If voters were prevented from voting, then who cast the votes? If Samajwadi Party votes didn't reach those booths and our candidate didn't get support, then who voted there? This is a serious issue," he said.
"Additionally, there were two types of slips, -- one with a red mark and another regular slip. We raised this issue on the voting day itself, stating that the administration had created such arrangements, leading to discrimination," Yadav alleged.
The Samajwadi Party's candidate for the Kundarki assembly bypoll Haji Rizwan too has alleged that his supporters were prevented from voting.
The BJP's Ramveer Singh won the bypoll in the Kundarki seat by a margin of over 1.45 lakh votes.