Although the state government has indicated that academic activities would start only in August in view of the Corona pandemic, it has not yet issued clear orders or guidelines. The Government seems to be adopting a cautious approach against any eventuality that might arise over its decision and is shifting the entire responsibility to the school managements. The government is insisting that schools must collect the views of parents about reopening of schools but there is no clarity on resolving the issue in case the parents are not unanimous in their opinion. The government seems to be wanting to have the cake and eat it too - it wants schools to reopen but is not prepared to face repercussions.
This along with the government’s lack of clarity on conducting online classes seems to be the reason why it is sending confusing signals. Recently two senior ministers issued contradictory statements on online classes confounding the confusion. While Law Minister J.C.Madhu Swamy has said that state cabinet has decided to ban online classes from LKG to seventh standard, Education Minister S. Suresh Kumar has stated that online classes will be disallowed only up to fifth standard.
In any case, the government seems to be taking a hasty decision on online classes despite being aware of the fact that more than 25 lakh children have no access to smart phones. The government also has no clarity about the alternative arrangements for those who cannot participate in online classes. In the absence of such arrangements, online education is bound to lead to discrimination. Poor children who cannot access online classes might also experience depression. The government should study the impact of the social divide and the digital divide that online education will create and disallow online education till SSLC. A hasty decision will deprive a substantial number of students of education.
In the midst of all this confusion, private schools are stuck in a quandary. It’s a wrong notion that all private schools are set up with the sole intention to make profit. Many private schools are set up to spread education with a service motto and their role in spreading education cannot be undermined. Not just in Karnataka, private institutions all over the country have created an educational revolution by imparting education on a large scale much before the government woke up. While Christian institutions were the pioneers, other private organizations eventually adopted the same model. Private schools must also be credited for providing education to the poor. When an increasing number of government schools are closing down, private schools are effectively filling the gap and are serving the public by charging reasonable fees. Such schools are now facing the brunt of the government’s confusion. The government should immediately listen to the woes of these mid-size private schools and, for the moment, keep the ‘five-star’ schools aside.
In the present circumstances, the government has two options. First, it should issue clear directions to schools about resuming academic activities instead of creating confusion and repose confidence in them. Even if it decides to reopen schools by August or September, it should provide clear guidelines. Second, if the government decides schools should not reopen this year, it should address the concerns of these private schools. While such a decision will not impact the rich schools, the schools that depend on the middle classes for survival will suffer a lot. One of the most significant problems before these schools that don’t receive any financial aid from the government would be the payment of salaries of staff. If these schools are shut for a year, the fate of their employees would be precarious and many of them would find it difficult to sustain. If the government assures such schools that it would provide at least half the salaries to employees, these schools might survive for at least a year. Otherwise, many schools might be forced to close down or it might become inevitable for teachers and staff to forego their salaries. In such a situation, the government must respond and step in to address the problem of these staff members.
But the most important task before the government now is to resolve the confusion that it has created by issuing contradictory statements and take a firm decision. The state cannot view health and education separately – one is related to the body and another is related to the mind. Both have a bearing on building a society. Our education minister should also adopt a reasonable stand towards the private schools that are working along with government schools to provide education as a service.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Lucknow (PTI): The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on Friday ordered a probe by the special task force (STF) into alleged irregularities in the rejoining of a teacher at City Intermediate College in Barabanki, observing that the reinstatement appeared to be prima facie illegal.
The court also directed the recovery of the salary paid to the teacher during the disputed period.
A bench of Justice Rajeev Singh passed the order on a petition filed by the college management committee. The court expressed doubts over the roles of the District Inspector of Schools (DIOS), Barabanki, the college principal and the teacher concerned and hence, directed a detailed inquiry into the matter.
Taking note of alleged manipulation of records and misleading submissions, the court ordered the immediate transfer of the Barabanki DIOS to ensure a fair probe. It also directed the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against the then joint director of education of the Ayodhya division.
In its order, the court found that the teacher, Abhay Kumar, was initially appointed as an assistant teacher in 2018 but joined an Eklavya Model Residential School in Chhattisgarh as a lecturer in June 2024 without obtaining permission from the management. His subsequent request to retain the lien was rejected.
Despite this, he was allowed to rejoin the Barabanki College in September 2025 on the directions of the joint director of education and the DIOS, and was even paid the salary for October 2025. The court termed the rejoining "wholly illegal" and lacking any legal basis.
The bench also expressed concern over lapses in communication within the education department and directed the Uttar Pradesh chief secretary to ensure that official orders are communicated through email and WhatsApp as well, to prevent disputes.
The matter is next listed for hearing on May 28 when a compliance report is sought.
