RTI misuse: Like thieves pretending to catch thieves
VB Editorial | August 13, 2025 |
It is not often that the legislature speaks in one voice. But on Tuesday, the Karnataka Assembly witnessed one such rare sight. Legislators from both the ruling and opposition benches came together — not to defend public interest, but to demand curbs on RTI activists. Their argument: the RTI Act is being misused by some activists to blackmail officials and elected representatives.
Like adding a rotten pumpkin to a spoiled coconut, the question raised by ruling party MLA Kaujalagi Mahantesh found eager support from opposition leader Basangouda Patil Yatnal. “RTI activists are building lavish bungalows, parking cars in front of them, and living in luxury. Where is the money coming from?” Yatnal thundered. The demand was for a new law to rein in RTI activists and curb their “illegal activities.” Some legislators even wanted special time allotted for a debate, though the Speaker did not allow it.
What the Assembly needed that day was not a chorus against RTI activists, but a serious debate in their defence. Because the truth is this: genuine RTI activists are the ones under attack. The law that once empowered them has been steadily diluted, and those who continue the fight for transparency are now paying with their lives.
The numbers tell a grim story. Since the RTI Act came into force, more than 80 activists have been murdered across India. In Bihar alone, 21 activists have lost their lives in the last decade. In Karnataka, at least six activists have been killed while pursuing the truth. Threats, intimidation, and false cases have become part of their daily struggle. Those who expose the mining mafia, sand mafia, or political corruption cannot even move about safely in public.
And yet, despite the risks, activists have kept alive the spirit of the RTI Act. Thanks to their work, countless scams have been unearthed. The irony is hard to miss: the RTI Act was brought in by the UPA government, and it was the very same law that exposed UPA-era corruption and contributed to its fall from power. The difference, however, is stark. For all its faults, the UPA still allowed citizens to question. Today, under the Modi government, the RTI Act has been hollowed out to the point where information barely reaches the people.
In such a climate, legislators should be demanding protection for activists. They should be asking the government to strengthen the law, not weaken it further. Instead, it is disturbing to see them accuse activists of blackmail, when in truth, it is the corrupt practices of legislators and officials that make them vulnerable in the first place.
When lawmakers cry, “RTI activists are blackmailing us,” they are indirectly admitting their own guilt. Yes, misuse of RTI exists. But misuse thrives only where corruption runs deep. If politicians and officials had nothing to hide, what power would a so-called blackmailer hold over them?
Yatnal asks, “Where do RTI activists get money for cars and houses?” But let every legislator ask themselves a more uncomfortable question: how is it that one’s wealth multiplies overnight after entering politics? How does a man who once lived in a rented house suddenly become the owner of bungalows and luxury cars after two terms in office?
To be clear, there are indeed a few who misuse RTI for personal gain. But that number is small compared to the many who risk their lives daily to keep democracy accountable. And the bigger truth is this — the misuse of RTI will reduce only when corruption among those in power reduces.
There is no need for a separate law to tie the hands of RTI activists. What is needed is a political class willing to clean up its own house. To attack RTI activists is not just hypocrisy; it is an attempt to silence the people and crown the politicians as the only masters.
In the end, this debate is not about activists versus legislators. It is about whether ordinary citizens still have the right to know how their money is being spent. And the answer to that question will decide whether democracy is alive, or just a slogan.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Husband has to equally participate in household chores as he is not marrying a maid: SC
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Friday said a husband has to equally participate in household chores like cooking, cleaning and washing as he is not marrying a maid but a life partner.
The observations came from a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta which was hearing a petition filed by a man challenging an order of the Karnataka High Court.
The high court had set aside a trial court order granting divorce to the man on the ground of cruelty.
During the hearing before the apex court, the counsel appearing for the man said the mediation between the parties had failed.
He said the marriage between the parties took place in May 2017 and since 2019, the couple is separated.
ALSO READ: Four held for throwing non-veg food leftovers near temple
"I (man) want a divorce. The trial court granted a divorce on the ground of cruelty," the counsel said.
The bench asked what the cruelty was as alleged in the matter.
The counsel appearing for the man said the woman had indulged in improper behaviour and was not cooking food.
"You have to equally participate in all these. Cooking, cleaning, washing, everything. Today's times are different," Justice Nath observed, adding the high court was right that it might not be a ground for cruelty.
"You are not marrying a maid. You are marrying a life partner," Justice Mehta observed.
The bench was told that both of them were working in a government school.
"Call both parties physically. We would like to speak to them," the bench said.
It posted the matter for hearing on April 27 and asked both parties to remain present before it.
