Government schools are in news again. The only time when government schools feature in news is when they are due to be closed. Reports in the media say more than 3000 schools have been closed and more would down the shutters soon. Primary and Higher primary education minister N Mahesh has said they’d ensure the government schools are not closed for whatever reasons. Governments in the past gave similar assurances but then they could hardly stick to their promise.
Governments assure that the schools won’t be closed. But the unsaid meaning in this is ‘if they close, remember we weren’t responsible’. If the attendance of children consistently drops in a government school, they’d obviously be rendered useless and shut down sooner or later. Our politicians know this well. None of the schools in our state closed by themselves. There is an organized conspiracy behind this. If you starve a person to death, doesn’t that amount to murder? Similar is the situation with schools.
The basic infrastructure of the school is consistently destroyed, and no new measures are initiated to ensure they begin to work well. When they do not respond to the needs of modern times, schools will obviously go into the oblivion. And this act is carried out by the governments. All parents send their kids to school with the hope that they’d be well prepared to earn a livelihood for themselves in the future and be ready to face challenges too.
Hence, they choose the schools with much care. If they feel government schools are not meeting the needs of their children’s future, they’d obviously take their children to other schools.
There must be some significant reason behind making private schools inevitable for parents, by way of weakening the government schools despite supply of books, mid day meals, free uniform and books etc.
Government is probably playing a role in this closure too. While some schools are being shut down, some of them are being adopted by wealthy corporates who have set their eyes on the most valuable land on which the schools stand. But then, some organisations, social servants and volunteers are really doing a good job of running defunct government schools better than the government itself.
At the same time, some vested interests are planning to materialize their plans on this occasion when the schools are being rendered useless. This ‘adoption scheme’ is being used really well by some organisations. Today, some schools are much like children who are not wanted by either of the parents. And in private space, parents are struggling to meet the expenses of kids getting into nursery and primary, forget even higher classes. If the schools shut down, children coming under BPL category will have a tough time accessing education. Even the middle class will have to fall prey to costly education. Kannada, the language, will hardly have any chances of survival. In the future, there’d be clear demarcation between the ones that can afford education and the ones that cannot. This would increase the difference between the haves and have nots.
Even if the government worries one little bit about the people in bottom most rung of the society, it should not allow closure of government schools ever.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Ahmedabad: A video of Justice Nirzar S Desai of the Gujarat High Court sharply questioning the state government over the legality of prohibiting videography inside police stations has gone viral on social media, reigniting the debate on citizens' rights and police accountability.
In a pointed exchange during court proceedings, Justice Desai asked the state’s lawyer:
"Tell me under which section videography is prohibited. Today we are living in an era of transparency. Assuming police are doing something illegal and a citizen intends to videograph it – which provision of law empowers you to stop someone from taking videography? Under which provision of law have you stopped the accused from video recording?"
The video has sparked widespread public interest, especially in the context of earlier legal interpretations around filming inside police premises.
View this post on Instagram
Background: Courts on videography in police stations
The question of whether video recording inside a police station is a punishable offence has previously been addressed by the Bombay High Court. In Ravindra Shitalrao Upadyay v. State of Maharashtra (2022 SCC OnLine Bom 2015), the Aurangabad bench ruled that such recording does not fall under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, which deals with spying. The court noted that police stations are not categorized as "prohibited places" under Section 2(8) of the Act. Therefore, secretly recording inside a police station cannot be treated as an offence under the Official Secrets Act.