They fear the mirror
Media is an inseparable part of the civil society. This section, performs the most quintessential part of holding a mirror to the happenings in the nation. If a government feels it can never catch its own image in the mirror, it means that particular government is moving in the wrong direction. Any government that has faith in democracy, will never shy away from checking its reflection in the mirror that media holds up to it and will use the same to deal with the dark spots and blemishes if any. But if a government breaks the mirror only because the mirror did its job, the blemishes will not disappear. They will still stay and hound the person who wears them on his/her face.
Mirror is not bound to show a pleasing image to the one who’s looking at it. It only reflects what’s held against it. If the media in a country begin to play the role of sycophants, by singing praises of the ruling dispensation, it means the country is surely tilting towards dictatorship. The authoritarian governments use two main weapons. One would be to buy the publication in order to limit the narrative written against its performance, and gradually turn it into another sycophant.
When the government itself become the boss of a publication, how would one write against the government or the party that occupies the seat of power? Gradually government would engage the same persons who write against it, to sing songs eulogizing its achievements. If a government cannot buy a paper, it would at least try and muzzle the voice of a neutral criticizer. In India, currently, both tactics are being put to work.
India, that was in the top on the list of nations that enjoyed high press freedom, has now consistently slipped and is on the verge of losing out to other countries. In the list of 180 countries that figured in the list, India stood at 138th number. Last time, the country stood at 136th position. The irony is, India now has taken the same place that Pakistan took sometime ago.
Pakistan is a nation that is indirectly under the military rule. Democracy is almost absent in that country. India never looked like that. Democracy and Freedom of Press were two most important aspects of India. Even former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru used to take cartoons, ridicule and funny barbs against themselves with a sportive attitude. They would never spew venom against someone who criticized them. Nehru and other leaders used those barbs to rectify their mistakes. Even Atal Bihari Vajapayee too never disturbed the freedom of press. Only when Indira Gandhi imposed emergency in the country, the journalists lived in fear.
But the most ironic thing is, though there is no emergency per se in India, the government is trying to silence the media in many ways. The corporate honchos that have brought this party to power are buying media houses one after another. And the media houses are relenting to these ‘sale’ offers because running a media house is not an easy task both politically and most importantly, economically too. It is almost impossible to run the channels or publications based on the subscriptions or sponsorships alone. The destructive forces are using this situation to their advantage.
This is the first time when our media is facing a situation worse than emergency. The news of NDTV, which did not heed to the ruling dispensation’s offer, being attacked through legal notices and IT raids became an international issue.
The efforts to silence NDTV through various means of notices, raids and allegations didn’t pay off. Investigating agencies too were pressed into service to achieve the goal.
On one hand, the media houses are becoming puppets at the hands of powers-that-be, on the other there are former journalists who lost jobs, or were asked to leave for their ideological differences. Now most of them have started their own websites, keeping their own fight on. The government has tried to silence that voice too. When The Wire website published the sudden wealth creation by Jai Shah, son of Amit Shah, it was threatened with legal suits. The polarizing parties tried to silence those who tried to bring facts to people using the court route or plain violence. The murder of Gauri Lankesh is one such instance.
Journalist Gauri’s murder has certainly been taken into account when the rating was done to measure the level of freedom of press a country enjoys. This apart, the matter of journalists who wrote about Army torturing those who report facts, has also been referred to. Millions of fake accounts have been created in order to shut people out of the space create fear in their minds. These fake accounts spend their time especially to disrupt discussions undertaken by journalists and writers are being watched more carefully to that they can be verbally assaulted. Trolls are working overtime to achieve this.
These are ways of ensuring people do not engage in debates against the parties they believe in. If freedom of press is disrupted, it shows on the whole country. The nation is marching towards authoritarian and dictatorial behavior rule, The current dispensation is using media, judiciary and other cases too to achieve its goal.
India needs to wake up before this turns into another Pakistan.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Trump confronts South African president over killing of white farmers
Washington, May 21 (AP): President Donald Trump used a White House meeting to confront South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, accusing his country of failing to address the killing of white farmers.
“People are fleeing South Africa for their own safety," said Trump, who at one point dimmed the lights in the Oval Office to play a video of a communist politician playing a controversial anti-apartheid song that includes lyrics about killing a farmer. "Their land is being confiscated and in many cases they're being killed."
Ramaphosa pushed back against Trump's accusation. The South African leader had sought to use the meeting to set the record straight and salvage his country's relationship with the United States. The bilateral relationship is at its lowest point since South Africa enforced its apartheid system of racial segregation, which ended in 1994.
“We are completely opposed to that,” Ramaphosa said of the behaviour alleged by Trump in their exchange.
Experts in South Africa say there is no evidence of whites being targeted, although farmers of all races are victims of violent home invasions in a country that suffers from a very high crime rate.
