When questioning government becomes Un-Indian
Should one not question the government if it fails to protect the nation’s borders? Is it unpatriotic to ask why foreign troops are occupying Indian land or attacking our soldiers? And more importantly, who decides what makes someone a “true Indian”?
These uncomfortable questions have returned to the forefront after a recent observation by the Supreme Court. In a case involving Rahul Gandhi, the Court remarked that “a true Indian would not make such a statement.” This was in reference to Gandhi’s past remarks questioning the central government’s silence over the deadly Galwan clash at the China border, an incident where Chinese troops had reportedly occupied over 2,000 square kilometres of Indian territory and launched a brutal assault on Indian soldiers.
Gandhi had raised these concerns during the 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra and even earlier in Parliament. He questioned the government’s handling of the border situation a subject that had already sparked heated debate in the House. A defamation case was filed against him for these remarks. In response, Rahul Gandhi approached the Supreme Court, challenging the summons issued by a Lucknow court. The Allahabad High Court had earlier stayed the summons.
While the Supreme Court has now stayed the proceedings, it did not hold back from making a remark that has since sparked outrage. Its comment that “a true Indian would not say such a thing” has added a dangerous layer to the ongoing national conversation. Already, in the name of citizenship documents, we’ve seen people being made to prove their identity, from ration shops to the Election Commission. Now, the highest court of the country has indirectly introduced a new filter: what one must or must not say to be considered “truly Indian.”
This is alarming.
Ironically, the same Supreme Court has on multiple occasions defended the right to free speech. Just this March, it quashed an FIR against Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi for posting a poem on Facebook, asserting the need to protect freedom of expression. The Court has also warned against curbing dissent in the name of national security. It has consistently said that hate speech should not be allowed under the guise of free speech. But in this case, the Court seems to have not only questioned Rahul Gandhi’s right to speak, it has gone a step further to question his very Indianness.
Rahul Gandhi is not just any citizen. He is a democratically elected Member of Parliament. And yet, simply for questioning the government, he faced the disqualification. When Parliament refuses to allow serious discussion on issues like border security, where else can opposition leaders take their concerns, if not to the people? If even that space is now being policed, then democracy itself is in danger.
When our soldiers are killed, when our land is occupied, is it not the duty of every Indian to question the government? And if an elected leader does just that, asks questions, demands answers, and is told that such statements make him less of an Indian, then we must ask: who gets to decide what being Indian means?
The judiciary, which is expected to uphold the Constitution and protect dissent, must not blur the lines between patriotism and blind loyalty. Otherwise, we risk normalising a mindset where questioning those in power becomes a crime, and silence is rewarded.
Every time something happens along the Pakistan border, even something minor, BJP leaders, including the Prime Minister, don’t hold back from making statements. But when Chinese troops invade our land and harm our soldiers, opposition leaders are told to keep quiet. And now, even the Supreme Court appears to echo that silence.
Time and again, when the opposition asks hard questions on national security, the response is that such statements “lower the morale of our soldiers.” But when a government hides its own failures behind our soldiers’ sacrifices, who else if not opposition leaders are supposed to raise their voice?
This isn’t new. Back in the 1960s, when China launched an attack on India, the then Prime Minister Nehru was widely criticised and held responsible for the deaths of Indian soldiers. Even when the slogan “Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai” was being promoted, China betrayed India. Hundreds of our soldiers died. The country lost precious territory. The BJP still blames Nehru for that defeat. Books like Himalayan Blunder, written by military officers, questioned leadership decisions at the time. Yet, no one called them “anti-national” or questioned their Indianness.
When attacks like Pulwama happen, or fighter jets crash during high-stakes operations like Operation Sindhoor, the ruling party wraps itself in the flag and avoids all accountability. But when Rahul Gandhi raises his voice about Chinese aggression, he is told even by the Supreme Court that a “true Indian” would not speak this way.
What does this say about the current state of our democracy?
It says that authoritarianism is no longer limited to political circles. It is now creeping into institutions that are supposed to check power, not protect it. When leaders are told what not to say, when dissent is painted as betrayal, and when the definition of an Indian is narrowed to suit political convenience, we have a crisis on our hands.
In a democracy, the job of the opposition is not to clap for the government, but to question it. Especially when soldiers die, and land is lost.
And if that act of questioning now makes someone less Indian, then perhaps it’s not Rahul Gandhi we should be worried about, it’s the very idea of India we need to protect.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
CM Siddaramaiah rebuts BJP's '63 per cent' corruption charge
Bengaluru (PTI): Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Thursday refuted BJP leader R Ashoka's accusation regarding a judge's alleged remark about "63 per cent corruption" in the state, saying the opposition is "twisting facts" and attempting to shift blame from its own past tenure.
In a post on X, Siddaramaiah said the Leader of Opposition in the Karnataka Assembly had “tried to hang the BJP’s bell of sins around the Congress government's necks and has ended up embarrassing himself” by misinterpreting the Upa Lokayukta’s comments.
"In the report submitted in November 2019, Honourable Upa Lokayukta B Veerappa had stated that there was 63 per cent corruption in the State. At the time he submitted the report, the BJP government led by Yediyurappa was in power in the State,” he clarified.
Countering Ashoka’s demand for a CBI probe, Siddaramaiah listed a series of scandals under the previous BJP government, saying corruption cases were "not just one or two".
ALSO READ: Karnataka cabinet approves draft bills on hate crime, social boycott
He accused the former regime of "shameless loot" even during the COVID crisis and said "a minimum 40 per cent commission was the norm across departments".
Referring to the death of contractor Santosh Patil, alleged irregularities in irrigation projects, the PSI recruitment scam and charges levelled by BJP MLC H Vishwanath against current state party president B Y Vijayendra, he said: “If we begin listing the scams from the BJP era, an entire epic volume could be written.”
Targetting the Centre, Siddaramaiah said under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who proclaims “Na khaaoonga, na khaane doonga” (Neither shall I take kickbacks, nor allow others to take it), India was 'sinking into corruption'.
He cited Transparency International rankings that place the country 96th globally.
Dismissing Ashoka’s claims as “foolishness”, Siddaramaiah asserted that his administration was ensuring transparency in “recruitment to transfers”, preventing misuse of money and power.
“Mr R Ashoka, the monumental corruption you created cannot be cleaned up in just two and a half years,” the Chief Minister said. “Give us some time — we will set everything right.”
Ashoka demanded the transfer of all corruption cases against the Congress government in the state to the CBI, and called for its resignation.
ALSO READ: September 13 to be announced as ‘Women Employees’ Day’, says CM Siddaramaiah
His demand comes following an alleged remark by Upalokayukta Justice B Veerappa that the level of corruption in Karnataka stood at '63 per cent'.
"We had fought against this corrupt government both inside and outside the assembly when the MUDA scam, Valmiki ST Development Corporation scam surfaced. At that time, CM Siddaramaiah repeatedly asked for evidence of corruption. As per our constitution, courts and judges hold big positions and what they say is regarded as order or a record," Ashoka, also the Leader of Opposition in the state assembly, said.
Speaking to reporters here, he said now a judge has stated that the government in Karnataka is "63 per cent corrupt".
"We-- BJP-- had made a 60 per cent commission charge against this government, but a judge has said it is not 60, it is 63 per cent. He (judge) said it at an event where he shared the stage with other judges and senior advocates. He has alleged that there is corruption in almost all departments, nothing happens without paying commission. Karnataka is in fifth position in corruption," he claimed.
At a public event on Wednesday, Justice Veerappa had claimed that the corruption in Kerala stood at 10 per cent, while it is 63 per cent in Karnataka.
He had said that he was able to witness it after becoming the Upalokayukta.
ALSO READ: Karnataka govt permits poultry feed producers to buy maize from farmers
Recalling that the Congress government, after coming to power, formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the "40 per cent commission" charge it had made against the previous BJP government, Ashoka asked -- what probe will the government order, following the 63 per cent corruption allegation against it.
"If you have any shame left, resign and go... you formed SIT against us, constitute CBI probe on this (allegations against Congress govt), if you have guts, let the corruption in various departments come out in the open," he added.
According to the LoP, Karnataka has become an "ATM" for the Congress party to fund any state elections. Power goes to those who give more money to Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi.
"For the recent Bihar elections, more than Rs 300 crore has gone from Karnataka itself. A breakfast meeting of Ministers was called to collect this money," he said, adding that Congress is synonymous with corruption, and corruption is Congress' home deity.
