Why Aligarh Muslim University now?
With the suicide of Rohit Vemula, the nation got to know how the Sangh Parivar had taken control of Hyderabad University. After this, JNU became the next target of the Sangh Parivar. JNU has always been in news for raising its voice for social justice in the society. This university has created many thinkers and social activists. The nematodes of the Sangh, who got into the University, tried branding the University as ‘anti-national’. But the students themselves stood up to every ill-planned attack on JNU.
Now Sangh Parivar has trained its eyes on Aligarh Muslim University. On May 2, many students from Hindu Yuva Vahini, an off shoot of Sangh Parivar and others from Akhila Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad barged into the University and insisted that Jinnah’s portrait that’s being displayed on the campus be removed. The attackers had even brought deadly weapons with them. And the modus operandi of Police and Sangh Parivar coming together is similar in this case too.
The Aligarh Muslim University is the epitome of modern outlook for Indian muslims started by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. He conceptualized this university to ensure Indian muslims integrated themselves into the country with the help of modern education. This university contributed many commendable names to the country. Third President of the Country Zakir Hussain, freedom fighter Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, French mathematician Andre Weil, first woman Chief minister of Assam Anvara Taimur, sportsperson Dhyan Chand, Lala Amarnath, Zupar Iqbal and others came out of this University.
The impact of AMU on history and future of India is massive. Sangh parivar has entered this university for the only reason that there is ‘muslim’ in its name. Jinnah portrait is a pretext, and not the entire context as it exists in AMU since 1938. Along with Jinnah, there are portraits of many other freedom fighters too. Jinnah was a muslim leader and a man who took part in the freedom struggle. As a result of this, it is natural to have had his portrait in the University.
How did the Sangh Parivar all of a sudden wake up to this portrait that has been there since 75 years, exactly on May 2, 2018?
If Sangh Parivar is angry with Jinnah for supporting and demanding a separate country for Muslims, we have to understand the genesis of this issue. This search will lead us to Lala Lajpat Rai, who realized the need for two nations.
It was put forth by Hindu Mahasabha leader Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. Hindu Sabha continuously sowed anxiety among Indian muslims and ensured that the demand for a separate nation was reflected as a demand put forth by Muslims themselves. Upper class muslims may have wanted a country of their own, but the poor men and women of the community never wanted to lose the soil they were born in. They never wanted to end the bond they shared with India.
Dadabhai Navaroji brought Jinnah to politics. Jinnah was a dedicated Congress member most part of his life. When Tilak was branded as ‘anti-national’, Jinnah fought to prove Tilak’s detractors wrong.
Muslim League wasn’t established by Jinnah, but he became its member six years after it was set up. He became the President of League three years later. In reality, Hindu Mahasabha consistently separated the muslims of this nation with the aim of establishing a hindu nation. Finally, Jinnah became a pretext for the division of the country and formation of Pakistan.
Jinnah had hoped that the new country be secular. Lal Krishna Advani, who travelled to Pakistan, recollected this on his return. As a result of that, he earned the wrath of Sangh Parivar.
Many BJP leaders have good opinion about Jinnah. One of the elected representatives of Uttar Pradesh has caused an embarrassment to the party and especially to CM Yogi Aditya Nath by saying ‘Jinnah was a great leader’.
If displaying Jinnah’s portrait in the university is wrong, displaying the portrait of Veer Savarkar who was responsible for the division of the nation is also wrong. Just not this, the statue of Manu Maharshi who propagated inequality among castes and genders, has been installed right before Rajasthan High Court.
Architect of the constitution Dr. B R Ambedkar had burnt copies of Manu Smriti for its venomous attributes against lower castes. Should this statue not be decimated?
Aligarh University is growing as a challenge just the way as JNU did against fascist forces. This has attracted the wrath of Sangh Parivar. It is the duty of every secular element in the country to come together and defeat the upsurge of fascism.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Another incident of alleged insult to Islamic prayer reported in Belthangady
case lodged against 47 individuals
Belthangady: Another incident involving individuals allegedly dancing indecently, dressed in a denigrating manner, and insulting the Azan (Islamic call to prayer) has come to light under the jurisdiction of the Venoor Police Station. A case has been lodged against 17 accused persons and 20 to 30 others who were allegedly involved in the act.
Based on a complaint filed by Mohammed Rafiq, a resident of Poyyegudde house in Padangady village, a case has been registered at Venoor police station against Savya residents Vasantha, Rajesh, Harish, Peradi residents Dayanand, Ranganath, Mohan, Shamit, Ravi, Ramesh Kulal, Suresh, Ashoka Kulal, Dhanush Haradottu, Harish Banthottu, Ramesh R.K, Suresh Barottu, Pramod, Prakash Peradi and 20 to 30 other individuals.
A case has been registered under Section 353(2) along with Section 3(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 for disrespecting Islam, Prophet Muhammad and the Islamic prayer Azhan by wearing Muslim attire during a 'Purusha Kattuna' event on April 14th.
A video of the incident is reportedly circulating on various social media platforms. In the purported video, a group of individuals can be seen wearing traditional Muslim attire and allegedly insulting the Azan by dancing indecently during a 'Purusha Kattuna' (a ritualistic dance performed by men of different castes, typically marking the end of agricultural activities) event held in Peradi near Venoor.
This incident follows a similar episode reported just days ago during a Purushara Puja ceremony, where Islam was allegedly disrespected. A complaint had already been filed with the Venoor police regarding that incident.
Leaders from the Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI) had also approached the Venoor police and submitted an official complaint, and demanded immediate action against those who are responsible for creating unrest in the society by wearing Muslim attire and hurting religious sentiments.
The Venoor police have now registered a case following widespread outrage over the alleged video denigrating Islam.
