Why Aligarh Muslim University now?
With the suicide of Rohit Vemula, the nation got to know how the Sangh Parivar had taken control of Hyderabad University. After this, JNU became the next target of the Sangh Parivar. JNU has always been in news for raising its voice for social justice in the society. This university has created many thinkers and social activists. The nematodes of the Sangh, who got into the University, tried branding the University as ‘anti-national’. But the students themselves stood up to every ill-planned attack on JNU.
Now Sangh Parivar has trained its eyes on Aligarh Muslim University. On May 2, many students from Hindu Yuva Vahini, an off shoot of Sangh Parivar and others from Akhila Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad barged into the University and insisted that Jinnah’s portrait that’s being displayed on the campus be removed. The attackers had even brought deadly weapons with them. And the modus operandi of Police and Sangh Parivar coming together is similar in this case too.
The Aligarh Muslim University is the epitome of modern outlook for Indian muslims started by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. He conceptualized this university to ensure Indian muslims integrated themselves into the country with the help of modern education. This university contributed many commendable names to the country. Third President of the Country Zakir Hussain, freedom fighter Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, French mathematician Andre Weil, first woman Chief minister of Assam Anvara Taimur, sportsperson Dhyan Chand, Lala Amarnath, Zupar Iqbal and others came out of this University.
The impact of AMU on history and future of India is massive. Sangh parivar has entered this university for the only reason that there is ‘muslim’ in its name. Jinnah portrait is a pretext, and not the entire context as it exists in AMU since 1938. Along with Jinnah, there are portraits of many other freedom fighters too. Jinnah was a muslim leader and a man who took part in the freedom struggle. As a result of this, it is natural to have had his portrait in the University.
How did the Sangh Parivar all of a sudden wake up to this portrait that has been there since 75 years, exactly on May 2, 2018?
If Sangh Parivar is angry with Jinnah for supporting and demanding a separate country for Muslims, we have to understand the genesis of this issue. This search will lead us to Lala Lajpat Rai, who realized the need for two nations.
It was put forth by Hindu Mahasabha leader Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. Hindu Sabha continuously sowed anxiety among Indian muslims and ensured that the demand for a separate nation was reflected as a demand put forth by Muslims themselves. Upper class muslims may have wanted a country of their own, but the poor men and women of the community never wanted to lose the soil they were born in. They never wanted to end the bond they shared with India.
Dadabhai Navaroji brought Jinnah to politics. Jinnah was a dedicated Congress member most part of his life. When Tilak was branded as ‘anti-national’, Jinnah fought to prove Tilak’s detractors wrong.
Muslim League wasn’t established by Jinnah, but he became its member six years after it was set up. He became the President of League three years later. In reality, Hindu Mahasabha consistently separated the muslims of this nation with the aim of establishing a hindu nation. Finally, Jinnah became a pretext for the division of the country and formation of Pakistan.
Jinnah had hoped that the new country be secular. Lal Krishna Advani, who travelled to Pakistan, recollected this on his return. As a result of that, he earned the wrath of Sangh Parivar.
Many BJP leaders have good opinion about Jinnah. One of the elected representatives of Uttar Pradesh has caused an embarrassment to the party and especially to CM Yogi Aditya Nath by saying ‘Jinnah was a great leader’.
If displaying Jinnah’s portrait in the university is wrong, displaying the portrait of Veer Savarkar who was responsible for the division of the nation is also wrong. Just not this, the statue of Manu Maharshi who propagated inequality among castes and genders, has been installed right before Rajasthan High Court.
Architect of the constitution Dr. B R Ambedkar had burnt copies of Manu Smriti for its venomous attributes against lower castes. Should this statue not be decimated?
Aligarh University is growing as a challenge just the way as JNU did against fascist forces. This has attracted the wrath of Sangh Parivar. It is the duty of every secular element in the country to come together and defeat the upsurge of fascism.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
LoP Ashoka targets CM govt over corruption, says being 'shameless' in public life not forgivable
Bengaluru (PTI): Targeting Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and the Congress government in Karnataka on corruption, BJP leader R Ashoka on Friday said, being foolish was forgivable, but being "shameless" in public life was not.
The Leader of Opposition in the state Assembly claimed that in just 30 months of its tenure, the Congress administration has broken every previous record on corruption-related controversies.
He was responding to Siddaramaiah's post on 'X' on Thursday hitting back at the BJP, stating that Upa Lokayukta Justice Veerappa's claims of "63 per cent corruption" were based on his report in November 2019, when BJP's B S Yediyurappa was the CM.
"But Ashoka, without understanding the Upa Lokayukta's statement properly, has ended up tying the BJP's own bells of sins onto our heads and has effectively shot himself in the foot," the CM had said, as he accused Ashoka of foolishness for trying to twist Veerappa's statement to target the current government.
Responding, Ashoka said, "it is one thing to be called foolish in politics, that can be forgiven."
"But in public life, especially in the Chief Minister's chair, one must never become shameless," Ashoka posted on 'X' on Friday addressing Siddaramaiah.
Noting that the CM himself had admitted on the floor of the Assembly that a Rs 87 crore scam took place in the Valmiki Development Corporation, he said that when a CM acknowledges such a massive irregularity inside the floor of the House, the natural expectation is immediate action and accountability.
"But instead of taking responsibility, you continue in office as if nothing has happened. What should the people of Karnataka call this, if not sheer shamelessness," he asked.
Pointing out that the CM's Economic Advisor and senior Congress MLA Basavaraja Rayareddy had publicly stated that under Congress rule, Karnataka has become No.1 in corruption, Ashoka said, "Yet, you still cling to the Chief Minister's chair without a moment of introspection. What should the people of Karnataka call this, if not sheer shamelessness."
Senior Congress MLA C R Patil had exposed the "money for House" racket in the Housing Department and even warned that the government would collapse if the details he has were made public, Ashoka said.
"Despite such serious allegations from within your own party (Congress), you neither initiated an inquiry nor acted against the concerned minister. What should the people of Karnataka call this, if not sheer shamelessness," Ashoka asked the CM.
Highlighting the "40 percent commission" allegation Congress made against the previous BJP government, the opposition leader said, the commission that the Siddaramaiah government appointed concluded that the accusation was baseless.
"After your own panel demolished your own claim, what moral right do you have to continue repeating that allegation. What should the people of Karnataka call this, if not sheer shamelessness," he asked.
For the last two and a half years, Karnataka has been 'drowning' in corruption, scandals, irregularities and allegations across departments. Ashoka said, "If I begin listing every case that emerged under your government, even 24 hours would not be enough."
"And the most tragic aspect of your administration is this: the unbearable pressure, corruption demands and administrative harassment under your government pushed several officers and contractors into extreme distress - including the suicide of Chandrasekharan which exposed the Valmiki Development Corporation scam - a sign of how deeply broken the system has become under your watch," he said.
Instead of fixing this hopeless environment, the government has tried to bury every complaint and silence every voice, he charged.
"Being foolish is forgivable, but being shameless in public life is definitely not."
"When your own ministers admit scams, when your own advisors certify Karnataka as No.1 in corruption, and when your own MLAs expose rackets inside your departments - clinging to power without accountability is not leadership. It is shamelessness in its purest form." PTI KSU
Earlier on Thursday Ashoka had demanded that the corruption case and allegations in the state against the Congress government be handed over to a CBI investigation, citing a reported statement by Upalokaykta Justice Veerappa alleging "63 per cent corruption", following which Siddaramaiah hit back at the BJP leader.
