Creative freedom can't be curtained on apprehension of public disorder: HC on film 'Emergency'
Mumbai (PTI): The Bombay High Court on Thursday said creative freedom and the freedom of expression cannot be curtailed and the censor board cannot refuse to certify a film just because there is an apprehension of a law and order problem.
A division bench of Justices B P Colabawalla and Firdosh Pooniwalla expressed its displeasure with the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for not taking a decision on the issuance of a certificate to Kangana Ranaut-starrer film "Emergency", and ordered for the decision to be taken by September 25.
It asked if the CBFC thinks the people of this country are so naive to believe everything that is shown in a movie.
On the petitioner's claim that the CBFC was delaying issuance of certificate to the movie due to political reasons, the HC noted the film's co-producer Ranaut was herself a sitting BJP parliamentarian and questioned if the ruling party was acting against its own MP.
Ranaut, who has directed and co-produced the film besides playing the lead role of former prime minister late Indira Gandhi, earlier this week accused the CBFC of stalling certification to delay the release.
The bench said, "You (CBFC) have to take a decision one way or the other. You must have the courage to say this film cannot be released. At least then we will appreciate your courage and boldness. We don't want the CBFC to sit on the fence."
The court was hearing a petition filed by Zee Entertainment Enterprises, seeking a direction to the CBFC to issue a certificate for the film "Emergency".
The biographical drama, earlier scheduled for release on September 6, is caught up in controversy after Sikh organisations including the Shiromani Akali Dal objected, accusing the film of misrepresenting the community and getting historical facts wrong.
The HC earlier this month refused to any urgent relief by directing the censor board to certify the movie immediately.
The court had said it cannot grant any urgent relief at this stage in wake of the directive issued by the Madhya Pradesh HC asking the censor board to consider objections to the movie before certifying it.
The bench had then directed the censor board to take its decision on issuance of the certificate to the film by September 18.
On Thursday, senior counsel Abhinav Chandrachud, appearing for the CBFC, told the court that the board's chairman has referred the movie to the revising committee for final decision.
Chandrachud said there was an element of apprehension of public disorder.
Senior counsel Venkatesh Dhond, appearing for Zee Entertainment, said this was done just to buy time and ensure the movie does not release before October, when elections are to be held in Haryana.
The bench noted the CBFC had not complied with its earlier order and had simply passed the buck from one department to another.
The HC said the entire exercise by the censor board had to be completed by September 18.
It was not for the CBFC to come to a conclusion that there may be a law and order problem and hence a movie cannot be certified, it said.
"This has to stop. Otherwise we are completely curtailing creative freedom and freedom of expression by doing all this," the HC said.
"Does the CBFC think the public in this country is so naive and stupid to believe everything they see in films? What about creative freedom?" it asked.
The court also wondered as to why people have become so sensitive towards what is being shown in movies.
"We don't see why people are so sensitive. My community is made fun of all the time in movies. We don't say anything. We just laugh and move on," Justice Colabawalla said in a lighter vein.
While Chandrachud sought two weeks time, the court said the decision has to be taken by September 25.
Dhond argued the movie was not being issued a certificate due to political reasons.
The bench, while questioning the political angle, asked if the petitioner was claiming the ruling party was itself against Ranaut, who is the co-producer of the film and also BJP Lok Sabha member.
"The co-producer herself is a BJP MP. She is also part of the ruling party. So you are saying her own party is against its member?" the court asked.
Dhond claimed the ruling party was willing to displease a sitting parliamentarian just to appease a particular section of society.
Zee Entertainment in its plea claimed the CBFC had already made the certificate for the movie but was not issuing it.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Another video of Karnataka HC judge making gender-insensitive comment surfaces
In previous video, Judge was seen referring Muslim dominated area in Bengaluru as Pakistan
Bengaluru: Hours after a video of Karnataka High Court judge Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda referring to a Muslim-majority area in West Bengaluru as "Pakistan" went viral, another video has surfaced showing the judge making a gender-insensitive remark.
In this newly surfaced video, Justice Srishananda is seen reprimanding a woman lawyer for answering a question directed at the counsel for the opposite party. The judge, in a light-hearted manner, commented that the woman seemed to know so much about the opposite party that she might even reveal the colour of his undergarments next.
The video captures the judge first questioning a male lawyer, asking, "You can’t write on a cheque just because it is empty. He will go to jail for 3 years. Do you understand that?" The male advocate responded in the affirmative, following which the judge inquired if the person in question was an income tax assessee.
Before the male lawyer could answer, the opposing counsel, a woman lawyer, replied that the individual was indeed an income tax assessee. The judge then asked her why she was responding, saying, "Wait, amma," prompting the lawyer to apologise. Justice Srishananda then added, "You know everything about him. If asked tomorrow, you will tell what colour of undergarment he wears," smiling as he made the comment, which also drew smiles from the other counsel present.
This second video has stirred further outrage on social media, with many demanding action against the judge for his inappropriate comment.
Senior Advocate Indira Jaising shared the video on her X account, calling for the Chief Justice of India to take suo motu action. "We call upon the Chief Justice of India to take suo motu action against this judge and send him for gender sensitisation training," Jaising posted.
