Michael Jackson earns more in death than he did when he was alive
Michael Jackson made $75 million (Rs 528 crore) in 2017, enough to make him the world’s highest earning dead celebrity, according to Forbes. The late singer is making more in death than he did when he was alive.
In 2016, Jackson’s earnings were over $800 million - the highest annual total for any entertainer ever, dead or alive - thanks mostly to the sale of his half of the Sony/ATV catalogue, which Jackson purchased first in 1981. He also rakes in millions through his Cirque Du Soleil show in Las Vegas and his publishing catalogue, which also features hits by other musicians.
According to Forbes, Jackson has earned over $3 billion pretax in his career - before and after death - and close to $4 billion when adjusted for inflation. Jackson, who died in 2009 because of an alleged overdose of prescription medication, would have turned 60 on August 29. His doctor was later convicted of involuntary manslaughter.
Other high earning dead celebrities, according to Forbes’ 2017 list, are golfer Arnold Palmer ($40 million), cartoonist Charles Schulz ($38 million), Elvis Presley ($35 million) and Bob Marley ($23 million).
The high earnings mean that his three children, Paris, 20, Prince, 21, and Blanket, 16, aren’t living like ‘vagabonds’ as Jackson had claimed months before he died in 2019. At the time, he was $500 million in debt.
Jackson’s videos have accumulated over 1 billion views so far this year.
Courtesy: www.hindustantimes.com
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
No govt protection, claims actress who accused CPI(M)'s Mukesh of sexual abuse
Kochi (PTI): A 51-year-old Malayalam actress who had levelled sexual abuse allegations against several male actors, including CPI(M) MLA M Mukesh, on Friday said she was not keen on pursuing her complaints due to "lack of support and protection from the Kerala government".
The complainant also alleged "carelessness" on the part of the state government and said she was "mentally exhausted" and therefore, not keen on taking the complaints forward.
"I would like to tell everyone that due to the government's carelessness and lack of protection for a woman who has come forward like this, I have suffered more than I can handle. I am mentally exhausted. They are not helping or protecting a woman.
"Therefore, I do not want to pursue the cases. It is not because I have compromised with anyone," she told reporters.
She claimed that she was made an accused in a POCSO case following her complaints against the actors, also including Maniyanpilla Raju and Idavela Babu, and the government did nothing to protect her.
"I am innocent. I want justice. I want the POCSO case against me to be probed thoroughly and quickly. If I commit suicide, the government will be responsible for it," she said.
The Muvattupuzha police had registered the case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, against the woman actor based on a complaint lodged by her relative.
According to the police, the incident occurred in 2014. The relative has alleged that she was a minor at the time of the incident and that the actor was running a sex racket.
The actor had vehemently denied the allegations and claimed that the woman relative owed her some money, and these allegations were to shift attention from her complaint against the high-profile actors.
The actress' allegations against the actors came in the wake of the disclosure of the Justice Hema Committee report which revealed instances of harassment and exploitation of women in the Malayalam cinema industry, prompting calls for action against the guilty.
The Justice Hema Committee was constituted by the Kerala government after the 2017 actress assault case.
The complete report was placed before the Kerala High Court which directed that it be handed over to the special investigation team (SIT) that was constituted to probe complaints of sexual abuse in the film industry.
Subsequently, 26 FIRs were registered by the SIT in connection with the revelations in the report.
