Dubai: With immediate effect from July 8, UAE businesses that fail to disclose information on the ‘ultimate beneficiary owner’ of that enterprise, will be liable for heavy penalties.
In the first phase, which began on July 1, establishments that violate Cabinet Resolution No. (58) of 2020 on the Regulation of Ultimate Beneficial Owner Procedures were issued with written warnings. The UAE has given an extensive roadmap to licensed businesses establishments in the country with the directive to comply with the regulations.
Following phase 1, the Ministry will levy administrative penalties on institutions that fail to adopt the essential measures to rectify their status in the second phase, the period which will start on July 8. Fines specified by Cabinet Resolution No.53 of 2021 will be imposed on non-compliant establishments in this phase.
More about the Penalties
Non-compliance to submission of obligatory legal requirements of 'ultimate beneficial owner' data by licensed and registered establishments in the country to the licensing authorities will lead to the imposition of administrative fines stipulated in Cabinet Resolution No. (53) of 2021.
First, a written warning will be issued and if the establishment continues to remain non-compliant, they will be penalized including but not limited to, a fine of Dh100, 000, as well as extra administrative fines such as the suspension of their business license for a year or restrictions on the powers of the board of directors.
As per the Gulf news reports, establishments can appeal against the punitive measures within the specified legal period of 30 days from the date of notification of the violation, following the decision.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Lucknow (PTI): The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on Friday ordered a probe by the special task force (STF) into alleged irregularities in the rejoining of a teacher at City Intermediate College in Barabanki, observing that the reinstatement appeared to be prima facie illegal.
The court also directed the recovery of the salary paid to the teacher during the disputed period.
A bench of Justice Rajeev Singh passed the order on a petition filed by the college management committee. The court expressed doubts over the roles of the District Inspector of Schools (DIOS), Barabanki, the college principal and the teacher concerned and hence, directed a detailed inquiry into the matter.
Taking note of alleged manipulation of records and misleading submissions, the court ordered the immediate transfer of the Barabanki DIOS to ensure a fair probe. It also directed the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against the then joint director of education of the Ayodhya division.
In its order, the court found that the teacher, Abhay Kumar, was initially appointed as an assistant teacher in 2018 but joined an Eklavya Model Residential School in Chhattisgarh as a lecturer in June 2024 without obtaining permission from the management. His subsequent request to retain the lien was rejected.
Despite this, he was allowed to rejoin the Barabanki College in September 2025 on the directions of the joint director of education and the DIOS, and was even paid the salary for October 2025. The court termed the rejoining "wholly illegal" and lacking any legal basis.
The bench also expressed concern over lapses in communication within the education department and directed the Uttar Pradesh chief secretary to ensure that official orders are communicated through email and WhatsApp as well, to prevent disputes.
The matter is next listed for hearing on May 28 when a compliance report is sought.
