Mumbai: Tesla has started hiring for multiple positions in India, days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with CEO Elon Musk during Modi’s bilateral visit to the United States.
The company has posted 12 new job openings on LinkedIn, all based in Mumbai. The available positions include Parts Advisor, Delivery Operations Specialist, Service Manager, Store Manager, Customer Support Supervisor, Consumer Engagement Manager, and Business Operations Analyst, among others.
Tesla, the world’s largest electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer, has faced challenges in entering the Indian market due to high import duties. However, with recent global trade shifts, including former US President Donald Trump’s stance on reciprocal tariffs, Tesla’s expansion in India appears more likely. The company will compete with domestic automakers such as Tata Motors and Mahindra.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has ruled that an accused can be arrested if they evade a notice issued under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and fail to cooperate with the investigation, The New Indian Express reported.
In an order dated March 25, Justice M. Nagaprasanna dismissed a petition filed by Yugadev R, a resident of Cuddalore in Tamil Nadu. The petitioner had challenged the arrest order issued on January 19 by an additional chief judicial magistrate in connection with a criminal case registered by Adugodi police in Bengaluru.
The case involves alleged offences under Section 66C of the Information Technology Act 2000 and Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, relating to identity theft and cheating.
According to the prosecution, the petitioner and his wife, who identified themselves as yoga teachers, started a company named Jai Bhairavi Devi Financial Solutions and collected investments through a website. Several complainants reportedly invested around Rs 39.20 lakh. Following complaints, a case was registered in December 2025 for criminal breach of trust and related offences.
The prosecution stated that the police made repeated attempts over a period of more than 40 days to serve notice on the accused under Section 35(3) of BNSS. However, he allegedly evaded service. He was eventually traced to Cuddalore, where he reportedly refused to cooperate with the investigation, leading to his arrest on January 17.
The petitioner argued that the arrest was illegal, claiming that the notice was not properly served in compliance with Supreme Court guidelines. However, the prosecution submitted call records and geo-location data to show repeated attempts to contact him.
After examining the submissions, the High Court held that Section 35(3) requires notices to be served in person and not through electronic means such as WhatsApp or other digital platforms. The court further observed that evasion of notice and failure to cooperate with the investigation justified the arrest.
