Truth or Hype: Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies
The meteoritic rise of cryptocurrencies from seemingly nowhere has confounded lawmakers and bankers, and polarised opinions. Some have heralded them as the future of currency, while others have dismissed as an elaborate e-Ponzi scheme. Cryptocurrencies or cryptocoins are neither new nor few.
To put it Simply, cryptocurrencies are digital assets similar to any currency held in e-wallets. But unlike them, cryptocurrencies are not issued or controlled by any bank or corporation. Their value is derived from the belief that others users will also value them.
The first attempt at creating a cryptocurrency goes back to the early 1980s with 'ecash', but it was in the 1990s that researchers began to make key advancements which led to the launch of 'b-money' and 'bit gold.' Then in late 2008, the bitcoin.org domain was registered, and a paper titled 'Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.' was published by the pseudonymous 'Satoshi Nakamoto.' Then in January 2009, Nakamoto published Bitcoin's open source software, and the bitcoin network came into existence.
Nakamoto became the first to solve the problem of double-spending in digital currencies. Another thing that made bitcoin unique was the fact that it was the first truly decentralized digital currency, where the transaction took place directly between the users using the 'peer to peer' model with no centralised intermediary.
Bitcoin used the 'trustless verification' model to secure these transactions. The 'trustless verification' model does not mean that there is no trust among the users of the system, but that the trust is distributed or decentralised.
In a normal face-to-face cash transaction, one person gives money to another person and they mutually verify on the spot that the amount is correct and that the currency is valid. However, if the two persons are not able to meet face-to-face, then they have to employ a third party that is 'trusted' by both; such as a bank, e-wallet, remittance agency, etc. In such cases, the trust resides completely with the third party.
Cryptocurrencies use the blockchain technology as the 'trusted' third party to facilitate two individuals to carry out a peer-to-peer transaction, to authenticate the sender's identity, and to validate the transaction using a transparent and decentralised infrastructure.
The Bitcoin model is the foundation on which other cryptocurrencies have been built.
How does it work?
In the bitcoin model, a transaction consists of an input (receipt) or an output (payment). A group of these transactions generated by different users is recorded in a public ledger known as a 'Block'. For a transaction to be valid, one cannot spend more than what one has, and each transaction must have an encrypted digital signature attached to it. This encrypted digital signature is generated by the system and ensures the authenticity of the sender and also prevents any alterations being made to the transaction once it is issued.
Since the Blockchain technology has no centralised system, the Blocks are maintained transparently on a decentralised global network of computers, all of whom share the same information regarding the transactions and therefore all share the same 'truth' at the same time.
This network uses what is known as the 'Machine Consensus' protocol to incentivise all the machines to come to a 'consensus' on the activities occurring within the network. The machines performing these tasks are known as miners.
Bitcoin, for example, uses a 'Machine Consensus' protocol known as 'Proof of Work,' which gives financial incentives to the miners to compete with one another to find new Bitcoin transactions, validate them, and add them to a Block. They then have to solve a complex mathematical problem to prove that they did the work of putting together the block of transactions. The Solution to this complex mathematical problem is what is known as a 'Hash' of the Block and is attached to the block as a seal and acts as a second layer of encrypted authentication on top of the transaction signature mentioned earlier.
Once a Block is complete with its list of transactions and its Hash, it gets attached to the end of an existing chain of Blocks based on a sequence determined by the Block's Hash. A chain of these Blocks is called a Blockchain. Once a new Block gets attached to the Blockchain and broadcast, everyone on the network update and synchronises to the new information. The longer a Blockchain gets, the more secure and incorruptible it becomes.
The system rewards the miners for the work done in two ways. First, every time a miner successfully completes a new Block, the system rewards the miner with cryptocurrency. Second, the miners are also given the transaction fees collected from the payers every time a transaction occurs.
Mining is required because the system periodically changes the key number attached to each hash, thus requiring fresh decryption every time the key changes. In the bitcoin system, it takes an average of 10 minutes for a new Block to be found by a miner. As more and more miners join, it gets that much harder for a miner to find a new Block. The average time to find a new Block varies between cryptocurrencies. For example: Litecoin is 2.5 minutes, Ethereum is 15 Seconds and Ripple 3.5 seconds. The faster a new Block can be found and added to the Blockchain, the faster a transaction can be verified.
The encrypted transaction signature and the hash sequence means that any alteration to a transaction, or to the Block sequence in a Blockchain, once it is published is practically impossible to alter. Therefore, the longer a Blockchain, the more trustworthy the transaction becomes.
Nakamoto mined the first 'Genesis Block' on the Bitcoin system, and was the first to make a Bitcoin payment. There are now well over 12,000 cryptocurrencies and the number is growing. About 25 of them have a market capitalisation exceeding $ 1 billion, and the top ten have a combined capitalisation exceeding $ 300 billion (2018 Q1). Cryptocurrencies are not all clones of one another; they have differences in their protocols, their algorithms, and their levels of centralisation.
To invest, or not to invest in cryptocurrency?
In reality, cryptocurrencies are just a series of ones and zeros within a computer network. Their real value as a medium of exchange will depend on three key determinants: their real-world usability or acceptance, their convertibility which will depend on their recognition by established financial institutions, and on them remaining legal. These are three simple yardsticks one should consider if investing in cryptocurrencies.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Trouble ‘Miyas’ everywhere only then they will leave Assam: Himanta Biswa Sarma
Says “Himanta Biswa Sarma, BJP are openly against them, we are saying it openly
New Delhi: Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Tuesday said that four to five lakh “Miya voters” would be removed from the electoral rolls in the state once the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists is carried out. He also made a series of controversial remarks openly targeting the Miya community, a term commonly used in Assam in a derogatory sense to refer to Bengali-speaking Muslims.
Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of an official programme in Digboi in Tinsukia district, Sarma said it was his responsibility to create difficulties for the Miya community and claimed that both he and the BJP were “directly against Miyas”.
“Four to five lakh Miya votes will have to be deleted in Assam when the SIR happens,” Sarma said, adding that such voters “should ideally not be allowed to vote in Assam, but in Bangladesh”. He asserted that the government was ensuring that they would not be able to vote in the state.
The chief minister was responding to questions about notices issued to thousands of Bengali-speaking Muslims during the claims and objections phase of the ongoing Special Revision (SR) of electoral rolls in Assam. While the Election Commission is conducting SIR exercises in 12 states and Union Territories, Assam is currently undergoing an SR, which is usually meant for routine updates.
Calling the current SR “preliminary”, Sarma said that a full-fledged SIR in Assam would lead to large-scale deletion of Miya voters. He said he was unconcerned about criticism from opposition parties over the issue.
“Let the Congress abuse me as much as they want. My job is to make the Miya people suffer,” Sarma said. He claimed that complaints filed against members of the community were done on his instructions and that he had encouraged BJP workers to keep filing complaints.
“I have told people wherever possible they should fill Form 7 so that they have to run around a little and are troubled,” he said, adding that such actions were meant to send a message that “the Assamese people are still living”.
In remarks that drew further outrage, Sarma urged people to trouble members of the Miya community in everyday life, claiming that “only if they face troubles will they leave Assam”. He also accused the media of sympathising with the community and warned journalists against such coverage.
“So you all should also trouble, and you should not do news that sympathise with them. There will be love jihad in your own house.” He said.
The comments triggered reactions from opposition leaders. Raijor Dal president and MLA Akhil Gogoi said the people of Assam had not elected Sarma to keep one community under constant pressure. Congress leader Aman Wadud accused the chief minister of rendering the Constitution meaningless in the state, saying his remarks showed a complete disregard for constitutional values.
According to the draft electoral rolls published on December 27, Assam currently has 2.51 crore voters. Election officials said 4.78 lakh names were marked as deceased, 5.23 lakh as having shifted, and 53,619 duplicate entries were removed during the revision process. Authorities also claimed that verification had been completed for over 61 lakh households.
On January 25, six opposition parties the Congress, Raijor Dal, Assam Jatiya Parishad, CPI, CPI(M) and CPI(M-L) submitted a memorandum to the state’s chief electoral officer. They alleged widespread legal violations, political interference and selective targeting of genuine voters during the SR exercise, describing it as arbitrary, unlawful and unconstitutional.
