“First, declare the dog as mad. Then kill it,” is the strategy that the Centre has been adopting to kill human beings if the situation warrants. Attaching the labels of “anti-national, terrorist, or extremist” gives the police the license to kill anyone. Those who are genuinely concerned about this are forced to refrain themselves from condemning such incidents fearing that they might also get labelled as anti-nationals. Recently, a BJP Member of Parliament, Anantkumar Hegde, called employees of  the state-owned telecom firm BSNL as ‘traitors.’  “BSNL is full of traitors. This organization is a disgrace to the country. BSNL has not been able to provide efficient services. We are going to finish it off. In the coming days, private organizations would replace BSNL. We are removing 85,000 employees and many more people would be sent home,” Hegde said this as though this was an ‘achievement.’ To defend the decision to ‘finish off’ a central public sector organization, its employees have been called as ‘traitors.’  The MP has thus unofficially announced that the ‘anti-national BSNL’ would be sacrificed in a ‘fake encounter’ that would take place soon and has defended the decision to render people jobless and send them home as an act to ‘punish the anti-nationals.’ But, he seems to have forgotten that through this, he has called his own government as ‘anti-national.’

Who is actually responsible for destroying the BSNL? Are only the employees responsible for this? The BSNL is owned by the Government of India. Those who run the organization are responsible for its failures, and not the employees alone. As the employees of the organization are a part of the government, isn’t the government also guilty for grooming the ‘traitors’? At present, besides the BSNL, the government is contemplating handing over several government organizations to the private sector. Can it then be inferred that Hegde is trying to defend these moves by calling the employees of all these organizations ‘anti-nationals or traitors’? Or is he calling his own government ‘anti-national’ for destroying government organizations and handing them over to the private sector? The ‘Patriotic MP’ must answer all these questions.

The tragic story of BSNL started with the economic liberalization and privatization in the 90s. When mobile phones made an entry into India, the government adopted a step-motherly attitude towards the Indian telecommunication industry. The public sector BSNL had ample strength to compete with the private sector in the mobile telephone sector as it had already expanded its service base to rural India. Unlike the BSNL, the private sector was yet to even own basic infrastructure. If the Government had used these facilities and built mobile towers, BSNL would have retained its position as India’s only telecom service provider. Unfortunately, this did not happen, and the employees are not responsible for this. The government did not allow the BSNL to compete with the private sector. The BSNL entered the mobile telephone sector five years after foreign companies and private companies established their roots. An explanation to the allegations of the MP that mobile networks are not available can also be found here. In fact, the allegations that the MP is levelling against BSNL employees can be made against other government employees as well. BSNL employees cannot be held responsible for network unavailability. Why is the BSNL not yet providing 4G services? Who is stopping the BSNL from offering the latest services  – is it the staff or the government? Without providing any facilities or opportunities for the BSNL to compete with the private sector, how appropriate is it to blame employees?

The main reason for the downfall of BSNL that has to its credit more than 50,000 mobile towers and Rs 89,000 crore worth property is the support provided by the government to a few corporate companies. Realizing that BSNL was on the path of loss making due to the government’s policies, many senior BSNL officials deserted the sinking ship and moved to private companies. In this manner, private companies protected their interests through BSNL. Five years ago, when Reliance Company through its Jio brand offered several popular schemes, it used as its brand ambassador, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s photograph. The Prime Minister’s role in converting BSNL into a loss-making venture is huge in terms of the failure to lift BSNL’s sagging fortunes and at the same time, providing all facilities to Jio and allowing the company to use his photograph. Hegde who has called BSNL employees anti-national should not forget this. Most importantly, not only BSNL, the government is making preparations to hand over several important government organizations including many profit-making ventures to the private sector. How did Reliance Company that has no experience in the defence sector become a part of the Rafael deal instead of the public sector Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)? The HAL which is the pride of India is getting ruined because of the Centre’s policies. HAL employees are not getting even their salaries regularly. Will the government term employees of even this organization ‘anti-nationals or traitors’ and kill the organization through a ‘fake encounter’? Hegde should answer these questions.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Lucknow (Farrukhabad): A viral video has surfaced showing a 16-year-old son of a BJP worker allegedly casting eight votes to the saffron party during the ongoing general elections in Uttar Pradesh. The video has sparked controversy, and the opposition has urged for prompt action from the Election Commission of India, reports scroll.in.

The video shared by the Samajwadi Party President Akhilesh Yadav on micro-blogging site ‘X’, showed the youngster recording himself while casting multiple times in a series of instances. The incident reportedly took place in Khiri Pamaran village, which falls under the Aliganj Assembly constituency within the Farrukhabad parliamentary seat. Mukesh Rajput, the sitting MP, is the BJP candidate in this constituency. Polling in Farrukhabad occurred on May 13 during the fourth phase of the general election.

In the viral video, the youngster is seen casting eight votes in total, all for the BJP, one by one with different clippings.

The youngster in the video has been identified as Rajan Singh Thakur, confirmed his father, Anil Singh Thakur to the Scroll.in. Anil Singh Thakur is the gram pradhan (village head) of Khiri Pamaran and a member of the BJP.

Anil defending his son told the Scroll that the ‘Video misrepresented his son,’ and claimed that the voting was done when the machine was being tested in some instances and other clipping of him voting on behalf of mentally and physically disabled voters was merged and made into a video.

Despite the Anil's caims, the video has drawn significant criticism. Subhash Chandra Prajapati, the additional district magistrate of Farrukhabad, confirmed to the Scroll that the administration will file a case soon. He mentioned that the returning officer is investigating the matter following a directive from the chief electoral officer in Lucknow.

The opposition has been vocal in its criticism, with Akhilesh Yadav demanding action from the Election Commission. In his social media post, Yadav accused the BJP of undermining the electoral process and described the party's booth committee as a "loot committee." The Congress party also called on the Election Commission to take action, in a ‘X’ post the party wrote, “Dear Election Commission…are you watching..a boy is voting 8-8 times ... .at least wake up now.”

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, took to ‘X’ to express, “Fearing and seeing their defeat, the BJP is attempting to undermine democracy by pressuring government machinery to deny the mandate. The Congress expects all officers performing election duties to remember their constitutional responsibilities despite any pressure from those in power. Otherwise, once the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) bloc government is formed, actions will be taken to ensure that anyone will think ten times before violating their 'Oath to the Constitution'."

Following the video's circulation, Naval Kishor Shakya, the Samajwadi Party candidate in Farrukhabad, filed a complaint with the district election officer. Shakya's complaint alleges that Rajan Singh Thakur cast votes after snatching voter information slips from other voters and that he was assisted by Dinesh Thakur, the local police station's station house officer. Shakya has called for re-polling at the affected polling center.

In a related incident earlier in May, Gujarat Police arrested two BJP workers for allegedly casting bogus votes and live-streaming the act on social media in the Dahod constituency. The Election Commission conducted re-polling at the affected booth following the incident.

The opposition INDIA bloc, including the Congress and the Samajwadi Party, has repeatedly accused the Election Commission of failing to take prompt action against election model code of conduct violations.