Ayushman Bharat needs to live long
Farmers are not the only people who commit suicide in our country. If one family member is diagnosed with cancer, the whole family may be forced to kill itself owing to financial burden that the treatment cost of the disease brings. Owing to the lobby of private hospitals, government hospitals aren't offering any great promising service to patients of this disease.
Smallest of the small health concerns can be a cause of worry for middle class owing to the claims that private hospitals are ensuring treatment is never efficient and economical. Govt hospitals are being gobbled up by corporate hospitals.
BPL card holders have some dedicated facilities for themselves. But the mode class people are facing major challenges in a accessing your education and healthcare.
General hospitals of a country soena a lot about its focus and commitment of a govt towards its citizens. Healthy citizens are the future of any country.
Hence the budgetary allocation made by a government towards health gains significance. As per the World Bank, India had spent only 3.8% of its GDP on health care services in 2015. While the global average of spending on health care services stands at 9.9%, America spends 16.8% for this purpose.
Only 15% people in India are covered by health insurance and more than 94% of health expenses are met using personal financial resources.
Hence an unexpected health emergency can consume the whole family with its expenses.
Owing to all this, Modiji's Ayushman Bharat is deemed to be a significant step towards ensuring health for all. Through this insurance, every family will receive Rs 5 lakh worth health insurance to be equally distributed to 10 cr families in the country.
This scheme is said to be initiated ay different from Swasthya Bima Yojana that existed in the past. This would be introduced under AB-NHPM and this also includes upgrading of the existing primary health care centres to disburse better services and assistance. Insurance amount has been increased from Rs 30,000 in the past to RS 5 lakh now.
The government hopes to reach 40% of the country's population through this, while digitalising Rajiv Aarogyasri Health insurance on the lines of what exists in Andhra.
But there are already questions about the misuse of this scheme.
Though the scheme is wonderful, some aspects may turn into challenges and ruin its whole purpose.
About 40% cost of this scheme has to be met by state governments.
Since this adds financial burden on the states, they may seek financial aid from the centre to meet the expenses. Many states that are have glaring poverty may need more contribution from the central government. This will stretch them for resources.
This scheme may work well in urban areas, but rural sector will still suffer the lack of facilities because good hospitals are still a distant dream in villages.
About 75% hospitals and clinics, along with 80% of doctors exist only in urban areas. They are serving only 28% of the population. Hence there is immense scarcity of resources and expertise in other parts of the state. There is just one bed per 1000 persons at India while the developed nations have about 6.5%.
There are about 0.6% doctor per 1000 patient in India while developed nations have 3 doctors for the same number.
Only 37% people are entitled to avail health services as inpatients within 5 km radius of their living spaces and another 68% people can access healthcare services as outpatients in the same space. According to the World Bank, till 2015 over 15% of Indian children could not get vaccine for various reasons. Private hospitals are most certainly capable of using up every lacunae in govt hospitals for their own benefit. Lack of facilities provided by the government will force people to reach out to private hospitals which may exploit the insured person to fill its own coffers. Unnecessary procedures and surgeries may be performed for the sake of sucking money out of the system. This may push the patient to the brink of death. The family will be in penury over such expenses.
At the same time it is important to observe the behaviour of doctors in government hospitals as well. Running a private hospital is much more economically beneficial than working in a govt hospital alone. Hence it is an open secret that most doctors run private practice on the side. Since health insurance sector has private hospitals in its kitty, it would encourage most govt doctors to run a private hospital or a private practice on the sly.
This whole arrangement may facilitate people to depend more on private hospitals for even smallest of the ailments for which they'd never visit a doctor earlier. A monitoring system to manage all this is much needed.
One does not know whether the govt is aware of all these aspects and probabilities, and if there is a system in place to check them.
We must remember private hospitals are quite a gold mine for insurance companies. We need to focus on making govt hospitals better with facilities and service delivery. If govt hospitals can deliver better services compared to private hospitals at economical prices, the latter will naturally reduce their costing too.
Health services are better and popular among people when they are economical and of good quality. This is a simple truth. For instance private hospitals in Tamil Nadu are competing to overtake govt hospitals which are way better. This way private ones have to keep their prices low to attract the footfall of patients.
As against this, private hospitals in Uttar Pradesh have skyrocketing prices. Hence the govt needs to focus on preserving and making govt hospitals better than before in order to reach the benefits of its schemes such as Ayushman Bharat. Private hospitals need to be kept in check. Else they'd turn out to be the biggest threats to people's health.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Cong takes swipe at PM over India not being part of US-led 'Pax Silica' grouping
New Delh (PTI) The Congress on Saturday said it is perhaps not very surprising that India is not part of a US-led strategic initiative to build a secure silicon supply chain, given the "sharp downturn" in the Trump-Modi ties, and asserted that it would have been to "our advantage if we had been part of this group".
Congress general secretary in charge of communications Jairam Ramesh took a swipe at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying the news of India not being part of the group comes after the PM had enthusiastically posted on social media about a telephone call with his "once-upon-a-time good friend and a recipient of many hugs in Ahmedabad, Houston, and Washington DC".
In a lengthy post on X, Ramesh said, "According to some news reports, the US has excluded India from a nine-nation initiative it has launched to reduce Chinese control on high-tech supply chains. The agreement is called Pax Silica, clearly as a counter to Pax Sinica. The nations included (for the moment at least) are the US, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and Australia."
"Given the sharp downturn in the Trump-Modi ties since May 10th, 2025, it is perhaps not very surprising that India has not been included. Undoubtedly, it would have been to our advantage if we had been part of this group."
"This news comes a day after the PM had enthusiastically posted on his telephone call with his once-upon-a-time good friend and a recipient of many hugs in Ahmedabad, Houston, and Washington DC," the Congress leader asserted.
The new US-led strategic initiative, rooted in deep cooperation with trusted allies, has been launched to build a secure and innovation-driven silicon supply chain.
According to the US State Department, the initiative called 'Pax Silica' aims to reduce coercive dependencies, protect the materials and capabilities foundational to artificial intelligence (AI), and ensure aligned nations can develop and deploy transformative technologies at scale.
The initiative includes Japan, South Korea, Singapore, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and Australia. With the exception of India, all other QUAD countries -- Japan, Australia and the US -- are part of the new initiative.
New Delhi will host the India-AI Impact Summit 2026 on February 19-20, focusing on the principles of 'People, Planet, and Progress'. The summit, announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the France AI Action Summit, will be the first-ever global AI summit hosted in the Global South.
Prime Minister Modi and US President Trump on Thursday discussed ways to sustain momentum in the bilateral economic partnership in a phone conversation amid signs of the two sides inching closer to firming up a much-awaited trade deal.
The phone call between the two leaders came on a day Indian and American negotiators concluded two-day talks on the proposed bilateral trade agreement that is expected to provide relief to India from the Trump administration's whopping 50 per cent tariffs on Indian goods.
In a social media post, Modi had described the conversation as "warm and engaging".
"We reviewed the progress in our bilateral relations and discussed regional and international developments. India and the US will continue to work together for global peace, stability and prosperity," Modi had said without making any reference to trade ties.
