Bank of Baroda is ill; Vijaya bank gets the shot
Karnataka is not a land of traders. But the state has made significant contributions to banking and cooperative sectors. Many banks took birth and progressed well based on their efforts, sincerity and integrity. State Bank of Mysore, Corporation Bank, Syndicate Bank, Canara Bank, Vijaya Bank and the cooperative banks that were set up and supported by the farmers themselves. All of them changed the direction and socio economic condition of our state.
After Indira Gandhi nationalised the banks, even the poorest of poor farmer could access the banking services. But under Modi’s administration, everything is turning topsy-turvy. Now we hear the news that banks would be privatised. At the same time, there are plans to sacrifice banks to save big corporates. State Bank of Mysore that was started by Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar and Sir M Visvesvaraya has already been closed under the pretext of merging.
Central government is all set to erase the symbol of pride of people of Karnataka coastal area, the Vijaya Bank.
Vijaya Bank is a mark of great dignity for the Bunt community for since they started it and ensured the bank would thrive and stay in sound profit even till date. The bank was started by Attavar Balakrishna Shetty in 1931, and the network was expanded to other parts of the country by Sundararajan Shetty.
Vijaya Bank is one of the most significant contributions Bunt community has made to the country. Today, all communities have been reaping the benefits of this. Central government is all set to wipe off this mark of pride and dignity of Bunt community today.
As a matter of fact, the government does not have a sound reason to shut Vijaya Bank itself. Because the state-owned Vijaya Bank is posting decent profits even now. Ironically enough, Vijaya Bank has to lose its identity to breathe life into the dying Bank of Baroda of Gujarat.
Bank of Baroda, of Gujarat and Maharashtra's Dena Bank are in massive loss owing to massive defaulting by major corporate companies since many years now. So to save these two loss bearing banks, the central government has decided to sacrifice Vijaya Bank by merging with those.
The total loss posted by public sector banks when the financial year ended on March 31, 2018 was at Rs 87,370 cr. Punjab National Bank which has been battered by a slew of scandals and bad loans that have gone unpaid, is on the top of the list of loss making banks. Only Indian Bank and Vijaya Bank were among profit making banks in the list of 21 healthy national banks in the financial year 2017-18.
Vijaya Bank posted a profit of Rs 727 cr, which is a great accomplishment. On the other hand, Bank of Baroda has posted a massive loss of in the trimester Jan-March 2017-18 to the tune of Rs 3102.34 cr. This shows the dark underbelly of Gujarat model of development by revealing how the traders of Gujarat undid their financial institutions including fleecing the Bank of Baroda.
In a report, Bank of Baroda has revealed the reserve funds owing to bad loans in 2016-17 was Rs 2425.07 cr and this jumped to a whopping Rs 7052.53 cr in 2017-18. Dena Bank is in the same boat. In second trimester of 2018 financial year around September, the total loss was Rs 416.70 cr. This amount is exactly the double of what the bank suffered the previous corresponding year as admitted by Dena Bank.
In the last financial year corresponding time, Dena Bank recorded a loss of Rs 185.02cr. Now for the wrong decisions made by these banks Vijaya Bank has to pay through the great sacrifice of self.
Government is mentioning this is a strategy of merging the strong bank with a weak one. Even if we understand that, why should Vijaya Bank lose its identity in the melee? Vijaya Bank is the stronger one in the equation of Dena and Bank of Baroda.
Hence they both could lose identity and Vijaya Bank's name should be retained forever. But here, things have turned upside down. Vijaya Bank will be shut forever. Bank of Baroda will retain its existence by taking the sacrifice of Vijaya Bank. This shows how strong the lobby of Gujaratis is working on the centre.
Economically, State Bank of Mysore and Vijaya Bank were most significant contributions of the state and now the centre is all set to erase them. In the coming days, south indian financial institutions would be sacrificed one after another to make good for the loss making banks in the northern part of the country. Even now, north Indians have occupied all vantage positions in banks across banks in southern part of the country. It has become almost impossible for people to transact in banks if they do not have the knowledge of Hindi. After Vijaya Bank merges with Bank of Baroda it will so straight into the hands of Gujaratis.
Why should we surrender the assets that we grew with the hard work of people of this land, into the hands of Gujarati Baniyas? This is a question people of this land should ask the centre, irrespective of whether they are coastal Kannadigas or belong to other parts of the state. The banks that are thriving right now may be used to provide impetus to dying banks in North India, owing to their own mistakes.
Let the Dena Bank and Bank of Baroda be merged with Vijaya Bank's instead of vice versa. Let the name of Vijaya Bank be retained for good. South Indian banks should never allow their ownership to the north Indian banks. To raise our voice against this is not just the obligation of Bunts who are losing Vijaya Bank now, but of every person in the state which has contributed a lot to economic health of the nation.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Speaker rules out discussion on Guv''s conduct amid K''taka Assembly standoff
Bengaluru (PTI): In an effort to end the logjam over the Governor's address that has stalled proceedings for the past week, Karnataka Assembly Speaker U T Khader on Wednesday ruled that legislators should not discuss Thaawarchand Gehlot or his conduct in the house, saying such debates send the wrong message to the public.
The House has witnessed repeated disruptions and adjournments since the session began on January 22 over the issue of the governor's conduct.
During his address to the joint sitting of the Karnataka legislature on January 22, Gehlot read out only three sentences from the 122-paragraph speech prepared by the state government.
The speech included criticism of the Centre for replacing the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajivika Mission (Gramin) (VB-G RAM G), portions of which the governor declined to read.
Concluding his address in about two minutes, the governor left the house, triggering a commotion as Congress legislators attempted to gherao him and raised slogans.
While the opposition BJP accused the ruling Congress and its ministers of "insulting" the governor and demanded action, the treasury benches countered by claiming the governor had "insulted the National Anthem by leaving before it was played."
The house again witnessed heated arguments on the issue earlier in the day, leading to adjournment.
During the interruption, Khader held a meeting with ministers and opposition members to resolve the impasse.
When proceedings resumed, the speaker delivered his ruling.
Referring to the events of January 22 and the subsequent debate, Khader said the conduct and discussions had conveyed the wrong message to the public.
"Our conduct as members of this House and the opinions expressed must be in good taste and in accordance with constitutional provisions. They must uphold the dignity of the House and its members. We must introspect in this direction," he said.
He stressed the need for caution to ensure that such incidents are not repeated in the future.
"Let us end this matter here, continue the discussion on the motion of thanks to the governor, and refrain from discussing the governor or his conduct in this house," the speaker said.
Leader of the Opposition R Ashoka said the house should express regret over what he termed an "insult" to the governor.
Responding, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said the situation would not have arisen had the governor read out the entire address.
"Asking the house to express regret is not appropriate. Why did the governor leave even before the National Anthem was played," Siddaramaiah asked.
BJP MLA S Suresh Kumar reminded Siddaramaiah that as Leader of the Opposition in 2011, he had asked then Governor Hansraj Bhardwaj to curtail his address.
Bhardwaj had subsequently placed the address on the table of the house, requesting members to treat it as read.
Siddaramaiah said the situation in January 2011 was different from the present one.
The debate grew intense, leading to another adjournment of the house.
