Brahminical symbols in lit fest unacceptable
A celebratory fair of Kannada has begun in Dharwad. That quaint city itself is home to many writers. Legend has it that if you throw a stone in Dharwad, it will go and land in some writer's house for sure. This goes to indicate every household in Dharwad has some writer or a poet or a lover of literature who would have dabbled with some other form of literature. Hence, this year's Akhila Bharathi Kannada Sahitya Sammelana has gained significance for many reasons.
Unfortunately though, the Sammelana is in news in the recent times for wrong reasons. Women folk and literary enthusiasts have questioned some of the primary events that lead to the Sammelana such as auspicious water pots being carried by married women to the venue of the event in a procession to welcome the guests, referred to as 'Poorna Kumbha Svagata’. Literature aims at upliftment and empowerment of every person through knowledge. Sumangali, a word referred to only married women, itself is laden with some sort of humiliation tone since it associates her right to be part of something with her husband's existence. Those who have lost their husband, are often blamed for the status that they have had no control over. Kannada literature has always been raising voice and concerns against such exploitation of women through traditions.
Known to be the first novel of Kannada, ‘Indirabai’ was about the widow issue. No other language literature has ever spoken against such ill practices surrounding widows as much as Kannada has done. Organisers of Kannada Sahitya Sammelan should have known what message Poorna Kumbha procession would send to the people of the state. After this issue stirred a huge controversy, the organisers gave a rather fleeting reply that anybody could participate in the poorna kumbha procession, and didn’t assure to remove this from the list. The very act of Poorna Kumbha itself is adhering to the celebration of patriarchy, by upholding this. This has no literary, traditional or cultural background instead of the fact that this is a deeply brahmincal practice, kept alive by the priestly class. Many objections have been raised in the past against maintaining and incorporating brahminical symbols into literary festivals.
Kannada Sahitya Parishat belongs to all Kannadigas. Anybody with any cultural background, whether agnostic or believers, can come and participate. Their single goal would be to work for the strengthening and upholding of Kannada language and its heritage to create better work for the future. The core of this is Kannada identity, and Kannada symbols. Kannada Sahitya Parishat owes it to people of celebrating Kannada through various people, since the government also generously contributes to this cause as this is tied to language. But since the last few decades, brahminical customs are slowly making way into the celebrations. A rational like Kuvempu, who criticized priestly superstitions etc had made scathing observations about keeping them out of a secular space. He had said brahminical tyranny and dictatorship had to end, if the world has to move further. His soul must be writhing in pain having seen where the Kannada cause stands now.
Literary festivals took a plunge after Harikrishna Punaruru became the chairperson. Under his leadership, the excellent organizer in him would curate wonderful events, but the soul of a literary festival lost the sheen in its ideals. The fests which would take place in the grounds adjacent to schools, started occupying massive grounds. Though Sammelanas have been held at hobli level, priests and Brahmins would occupy the core areas of these celebrations. Through this, literature was made subservient to priestly class. This Poorna Kumbha welcome by ‘Sumangalis’ is part of this subservient tradition that defeats the cause of Kannada and rationalism. In the past, to get the good attention of Kings and spiritual gurus, young women would be lined up with Kumbhas to welcome them. The intention was that by looking at the face of married women, the royal guests would be pleased. This is not a pro-human celebration.
Now when the chairperson of the Sammelana says anybody can participate in the procession of Poorna Kumbha, how does it even make the damage good when the act itself is laden with religious innuendos? Would widows join this procession just because the Sahitya Parishat Chairperson said so? If they are humiliated, will the chairperson take responsibility for this? Including the Dasara, vedic and brahminical practices are increasingly taking the centre stage defeating the norms of democracy, and celebrating monarchy. At least Kannada Sahitya should be independent of that. The car procession of the chairperson of the festival, prompting women to usher the guests, all such age old meaningless celebrations should end. The chair persons of Sammenala have to speak against these. How can a writer do better for a society if he cannot go beyond the self-glorification and think rationally? Why should the government spend crores on something that would get lost as a celebration without having to do much for the progress of Kannada?
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Speaker rules out discussion on Guv''s conduct amid K''taka Assembly standoff
Bengaluru (PTI): In an effort to end the logjam over the Governor's address that has stalled proceedings for the past week, Karnataka Assembly Speaker U T Khader on Wednesday ruled that legislators should not discuss Thaawarchand Gehlot or his conduct in the house, saying such debates send the wrong message to the public.
The House has witnessed repeated disruptions and adjournments since the session began on January 22 over the issue of the governor's conduct.
During his address to the joint sitting of the Karnataka legislature on January 22, Gehlot read out only three sentences from the 122-paragraph speech prepared by the state government.
The speech included criticism of the Centre for replacing the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajivika Mission (Gramin) (VB-G RAM G), portions of which the governor declined to read.
Concluding his address in about two minutes, the governor left the house, triggering a commotion as Congress legislators attempted to gherao him and raised slogans.
While the opposition BJP accused the ruling Congress and its ministers of "insulting" the governor and demanded action, the treasury benches countered by claiming the governor had "insulted the National Anthem by leaving before it was played."
The house again witnessed heated arguments on the issue earlier in the day, leading to adjournment.
During the interruption, Khader held a meeting with ministers and opposition members to resolve the impasse.
When proceedings resumed, the speaker delivered his ruling.
Referring to the events of January 22 and the subsequent debate, Khader said the conduct and discussions had conveyed the wrong message to the public.
"Our conduct as members of this House and the opinions expressed must be in good taste and in accordance with constitutional provisions. They must uphold the dignity of the House and its members. We must introspect in this direction," he said.
He stressed the need for caution to ensure that such incidents are not repeated in the future.
"Let us end this matter here, continue the discussion on the motion of thanks to the governor, and refrain from discussing the governor or his conduct in this house," the speaker said.
Leader of the Opposition R Ashoka said the house should express regret over what he termed an "insult" to the governor.
Responding, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said the situation would not have arisen had the governor read out the entire address.
"Asking the house to express regret is not appropriate. Why did the governor leave even before the National Anthem was played," Siddaramaiah asked.
BJP MLA S Suresh Kumar reminded Siddaramaiah that as Leader of the Opposition in 2011, he had asked then Governor Hansraj Bhardwaj to curtail his address.
Bhardwaj had subsequently placed the address on the table of the house, requesting members to treat it as read.
Siddaramaiah said the situation in January 2011 was different from the present one.
The debate grew intense, leading to another adjournment of the house.
