Rajasthan government increased stamp duty on cattle safety in the recent times. Now, the same govt is hiking taxes on alcohol, again, towards cattle protection, or Gau Rakshan in other words. We are sure people may have no objections to extra taxes being levied on alcohol and even if there is, one may not even express/demonstrate it. But, so far the state hasn’t elaborated on how it would use the money thus collected for cattle protection. In the days to come, cattle protection as a reason may see more taxes being levied on many services/products across many states in North India.

At the same time, the government needs inform the public about how it would use the cattle protection money collected under various headers. Collecting funds in the name of cattle is happening in the country for the first time ever in the history of the country. Does that mean the cattle weren’t safe so far? Did any expert submit any report regarding diminishing number of cattle or declared cattle as endangered species? The farmers who rear these cattle never took to streets seeking protection for cattle. Why would the govt take up this task? Cattle are not wild animals that live on the fringes of the forest. What is government’s ‘self-goal’ in working on this purpose? Cattle are not animals that can safeguard themselves in wilderness. Their lives are intertwined with those of farmers or those who rear them. In fact history reveals that India is always known for cattle rearing than cattle protection. Gau Rakshaks are not the reason for the safety of the cattle breed. The farmers have been breeding cattle as part of their livelihood. Cattle rearing has more economic reasons to be carried out, than the religious ones. Farmers would naturally care for cattle till dairy farming remains a profitable business. When it goes downhill, the farmers cannot afford to keep the animals for the love of it. At this juncture the government will have to step in for the rescue operations and save the cows. Keeping dairy farming profitable is the lone option to ensure cattle safety. At one stage, the very cows have turned into a challenge for the farmers. But for BJP govt, cows are a matter of emotional importance. The farmers who are rearing cows have become victims of govt policies around cow rearing.

Cattle are the property of farmers who reserve the right to sell them or when to dispose them off because he has invested his precious and rare financial resources on them. Other aspects of dairy farming are profitable too. While milk and its by products can yield good profit, the cow dung makes for excellent fertilizer. This does not mean all cows need to provide milk to justify their lifetime. While there are cows, there are Oxen too. These days, nobody uses the ox to till or plough the field. And when cattle stop being productive, they sell them to traders since rearing them after that point becomes a liability for the owner. With the money they get from selling the cows, they provide food for more cattle in their sheds. Hence farmers sell the cows that stop being useful, just so that they can provide for other cows. Poor people sell cows to make for their expenses whenever they need resources or to meet any sudden need for funds. This also has another strategy. Beef is packed with rare proteins that other meats lack. It is also the most economic meat that easily available. Long ago, even the poor would serve beef at their family functions. The logic of consuming beef would contributed to cattle turning into rare animals, itself lacks a solid argument. Because farmers do not rear cows for meat, but meat is procured only when the cows are slaughtered at the butcher’s for the very purpose. These are the cows that have been given up on, by their owners. The govt is planning on opening Cow Rescue centres or Gaushalas. This would rob the farmers of one source of income, if the cattle are forcefully taken away. Goshalas are a massive scam waiting to happen too. All the money collected in the name of cattle preservation would reach the deep pockets of pretentiously spiritual gurus and make the, richer. Not only this, youths forming gangs in the name of Gau Rakshaks has also crossed all limits of tolerance. Gau Rakshaks are nothing but goondas in groups, sanctioned by the government. The cattle traders have been attacked and assaulted sometimes even killed as well. If this continues, not many traders would buy cattle. And as far as the sellers are concerned, there are gory days ahead with surplus demand and no supply. This would turn the whole village economic ecosystem upside down increasing joblessness. In the days to come, it is highly possible that cow rearers or traders will turn away from this issue altogether. Till such time, it’s a free run for the others.

 

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Thane (PTI): A court in Bhiwandi in Thane district on Saturday adjourned the hearing in the criminal defamation case filed against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi by a Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) worker to December 20 due to non-availability of a crucial prosecution witness.

Advocate Narayan Iyer, counsel for Rahul Gandhi, confirmed the adjournment, stating that the witness, Ashok Saykar, currently Deputy Superintendent of Police in Barshi in Solapur, could not remain present due to personal reasons.

Saykar's evidence is now likely to be recorded on December 29.

His testimony is considered key because he, as police sub inspector in 2014, conducted the preliminary inquiry into the private defamation matter under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

It was on the basis of Saykar's submitted report that the court subsequently issued process (summons) against Rahul Gandhi under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The criminal defamation case was filed by local RSS worker Rajesh Kunte following a speech given by Rahul Gandhi at an election rally near Bhiwandi on March 6, 2014.

The case stems from the Congress leader's alleged statement that "the RSS people killed (Mahatma) Gandhi."

The matter is being heard by Bhiwandi Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, P M Kolse.

The hearing had previously been adjourned on November 15 after the complainant's counsel, Advocate Prabodh Jaywant, moved an application seeking permission to examine Saykar, who had submitted the probe report to the court.

The matter was originally scheduled for November 29 but was deferred to December 6 after Rahul Gandhi's legal team sought an adjournment citing their non-availability. The proceedings will now resume on December 20.