A major point that could have been detrimental for the coalition government has been tackled right away. The question whether Kumaraswamy would remain a full term CM could have been a bone of contention if it was not addressed right now. The fact that this question has been answered without giving much space for it to gain different proportions is not only a surprising move, but also a fact that has brought much solace to the people of the state. It was rather inevitable that Congress with its 78 seats would offer the CM post on a platter to JD(S) with 37 seats. But it was somehow assumed that JD(S) and Congress would share the term of CM equally between themselves. Congress even deserved to have a CM of its own party for half the term. Because people’s mandate is favourably leaning towards Congress and the party has a large vote share too. And JD(S) would have been on a beneficial side with this arrangement. However, former PM Deve Gowda turned the whole situation in the favour of his party. And for the first time perhaps, Congress has faced the reality on a very pragmatic note. The party has set its sights on long term benefits of having to let go of the CM’s post for now.

Congress plans to come back in a big way in 2019 elections, hopefully clinching the PM post for itself. The expectations of Congress in the state went haywire, and this has given them a very uncertain feeling about 2019 elections. The party strategy now needs to be stronger than before to face the elections. Hence Congress is forging alliance with smaller parties at every possible opportunity to pose a challenge to NDA in the upcoming elections. That’s the whole reason behind offering CM’s post to HD Kumaraswamy for full term. If JD(S) and Congress can truck together to face elections in the state, the results can be highly favourable. JD(S) will have to return the favour by catapulting Rahul to the post of PM. If JD(S) has entered into coalition with BJP, Kumaraswamy would have probably lost his life time opportunity to be a full term CM! He would have had to share the seat with Yeddyurappa like it happened last time.

And even that would have been tough since the undercurrents of BJP suggest otherwise. Now JD(S) has the opportunity to have its cake and eat it too. Till last time, JD(S) didn’t hope to clinch big number of seats. The results weren’t even promising. Yet, the fact that it is riding over the party with 78 MLAs is a fact that may create discontentment among the Congress members. Hence, soon after coalition government was formed, there were statements about the term of the current CM wasn’t decided yet. But the Delhi high command concurring and announcing full support for HDK’s full term as CM, hasn’t gone down well among the members of Cong. Time can only answer how this entire decision would play out in Lok Sabha elections. This may weaken Congress and strengthen JD(S)’s presence in the state. Now major portfolios have gone to JD(S). Having suffered through demonetization, JD(S) will definitely find this a major resource to spring back to form. HDK as full term CM can work wonders for the confidence of JD(S) members and the party by the time Lok Sabha elections arrive.

But looks like this is a tentative situation since many Cong members have already expressed doubts on HDK’s full term run, and its impact on Congress in the state. Hence the coalition may continue till 2019 elections and then the fight for CM post may assume full form after the elections depending on how well Congress does.  

Some members may even quit the party dissatisfied over HDK being given all the power. Hence the probabilities of 2019 elections has definitely raised curiosity in the state. If the allies like it happened in UP join in, BJP may face a tough challenge. But we have also seen how fast the allies have dissipated into thin air in the country. Rahul Gandhi may be the PM candidate in Congress and other parties may have even more experienced seniors much deserving of the post. Hence, it is not impossible for even HD Devegowda to push Rahul aside and occupy the seat himself. The Congress then would have lost the big and small picture both.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New York, Apr 7 (PTI): The US Supreme Court has rejected 26/11 Mumbai terror attack accused Tahawwur Rana's appeal seeking a stay on his extradition to India, moving him closer to being handed over to Indian authorities to face justice.

Rana, 64, a Canadian national of Pakistani origin, is currently lodged at a metropolitan detention centre in Los Angeles.

He is known to be associated with Pakistani-American terrorist David Coleman Headley, one of the main conspirators of the 26/11 attacks. Headley conducted a recce of Mumbai before the attacks by posing as an employee of Rana’s immigration consultancy.

Rana had submitted an ‘Emergency Application For Stay Pending Litigation of Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus' on February 27, 2025, with Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States and Circuit Justice for the Ninth Circuit Elena Kagan.

Kagan had denied the application earlier last month.

Rana had then renewed his ‘Emergency Application for Stay Pending Litigation of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus previously addressed to Justice Kagan’, and requested that the renewed application be directed to US Chief Justice John Roberts.

An order on the Supreme Court website noted that Rana's renewed application had been “distributed for Conference” on April 4 and the “application” has been “referred to the Court.”

A notice on the Supreme Court website Monday said that “Application denied by the Court.”

Rana was convicted in the US of one count of conspiracy to provide material support to the terrorist plot in Denmark and one count of providing material support to Pakistan-based terrorist organisation Lashker-e-Taiba which was responsible for the attacks in Mumbai.

New York-based Indian-American attorney Ravi Batra had told PTI that Rana had made his application to the Supreme Court to prevent extradition, which Justice Kagan denied on March 6. The application was then submitted before Roberts, “who has shared it with the Court to conference so as to harness the entire Court’s view.”

The Supreme Court justices are Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, and Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

In his emergency application, Rana had sought a stay of his extradition and surrender to India pending litigation (including exhaustion of all appeals) on the merits of his February 13.

In that petition, Rana argued that his extradition to India violates US law and the UN Convention Against Torture "because there are substantial grounds for believing that, if extradited to India, the petitioner will be in danger of being subjected to torture."

"The likelihood of torture in this case is even higher though as petitioner faces acute risk as a Muslim of Pakistani origin charged in the Mumbai attacks,” the application said.

The application also said that his “severe medical conditions” render extradition to Indian detention facilities a “de facto" death sentence in this case.

The US Supreme Court denied Rana's petition for a writ of certiorari relating to his original habeas petition on January 21. The application notes that on that same day, newly-confirmed Secretary of State Marco Rubio had met with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar.

When Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in Washington on February 12 to meet with Trump, Rana’s counsel received a letter from the Department of State, stating that “on February 11, 2025, the Secretary of State decided to authorise” Rana’s "surrender to India,” pursuant to the “Extradition Treaty between the United States and India”.

Rana’s Counsel requested from the State Department the complete administrative record on which Secretary Rubio based his decision to authorize Rana’s surrender to India.

The Counsel also requested immediate information of any commitment the United States has obtained from India with respect to Rana’s treatment. “The government declined to provide any information in response to these requests,” the application said.

It added that given Rana’s underlying health conditions and the State Department’s findings regarding the treatment of prisoners, it is very likely “Rana will not survive long enough to be tried in India".

During a joint press conference with Prime Minister Modi in the White House in February, President Donald Trump announced that his administration has approved the extradition of "very evil" Rana, wanted by Indian law enforcement agencies for his role in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, "to face justice in India”.

A total of 166 people, including six Americans, were killed in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks in which 10 Pakistani terrorists laid a more than 60-hour siege, attacking and killing people at iconic and vital locations in Mumbai.