The last state assembly election had thrown up unexpected results. Some of the important ones on that are Siddaramaiah's charisma losing its charm, BJP getting highest number of seats and HDK becoming the CM even with least seats in the assembly.Even BSP which had entered into an agreement with JDS bagged a seat. Most respected and adored Dalit leader from Kollegal N Mahesh was elected. This is a major milestone for BSP which barely had any presence in the state. The party was excited about one of their own candidates becoming a Minister. This could have been a major opportunity for the party to create a base for itself in the state.
The party should have deemed it as an opportunity to grow itself in the state instead of just assuming one of their own men became a minister. But to toppling everybody's expectations Mahesh has resigned from his post of primary education minister.It is said that this was done owing to Mayawati's instructions to him over Madhya Pradesh and Chattisgarh elections and the coalition partners of BSP in these states.The number of BSP voters in the state is rather dismal. Forget the other community votes, even if the party had managed to bag 50% of dalit votes, it didn't have to worry so much about its existence now.
If the party hadn't struck a deal with JDS as a coalition partner, Mahesh's victory in Kollegal was a tough deal since BSP could win only one seat of the 20 seats it contested from in the state. And even for one victory, it was Mahesh's individual persona that worked more than the party's image. If this isn't the case. Mayawati's image should have cast it's magic on other constituencies too for people to win or make a good cut among voters elsewhere.
BSP gained some weight with its coalition with JDS while the latter didn't get much benefit from the partnership. There is a difference between BSP in other states such as Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, as against Karnataka. Dalit ideology is still a mirage at root level here. Already the Dalit leaders are indulging in selfish politics, even as BSP is yet to make a cut in the state. Though BSP won't gain much from the resignation of Mahesh, his departure has left a huge feeling of void and disbelief among Dalits and marginalised communities. This would also have an effect on the spirit of BSP activists and workers in the state. Mahesh was given primary education as portfolio. Most of the dalit kids are getting affected by closure of government schools in their villages and areas. He could have worked to constructively change this for their future. He could have improved the situation of schools and improved syllabus to give children an empowering childhood through scientific and rational education. One does not know whether this could have helped BSP, but surely enough it would have uplifted the marginalised communities to arm them with most modern thoughts and education.
Now with his resignation, Mayawati has to provide some logic on how it would help the party's image and growth in the state. The finality of stating ‘won't truck with any other party’ by Mayawati is to go with new coalition partners such as BJP. But let us, for a moment, respect her statement that it is better to go it alone instead of joining hands with someone else for the sake of seats/posts. BSP now has a base in the state. It does not have to go with a begging bowl to others. It has one just one seat while being coalition partners with JD(S).
Mayawati’s hope of capturing Dalit votes through coalition with JD(S) and Cong itself if somehow deeply lacking in understanding and strategy. This shows Mayawati is no different from other North centric politicians who have no understanding of Southern states. If she is indicating through Mahesh’s resignation that Dalits should not support JD(S) or Congress, who is she indicating that the community supports? What’s the main reason behind Mahesh’s resignation? This has caused a big loss to the Dalit and marginalized communities. If a high-command of a yet-to-be-stable party can stunt its own growth, what can we say about other national parties?
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Bengaluru: Bengaluru Milk Union Ltd President D.K. Suresh on Monday said it is inappropriate for MLAs to seek free IPL tickets, adding that those interested in watching matches should pay for them personally.
Speaking to reporters near his residence in Sadashivanagar, he said, “IPL is a commercial tournament and does not represent the country. It is not right for public representatives to focus too much on such matters.”
Referring to the recent controversy during the RCB celebrations, he said, “let us find out who benefited the most from the statements made during the incident.” He also pointed out that BJP MLAs had received IPL tickets as well.
Responding to discussions about relocating the Chinnaswamy Stadium, Suresh said the government has already approved the construction of a new stadium at a location he had proposed.
“I had suggested building a stadium in Surya City and submitted a proposal for it. Bengaluru needs four stadiums in four directions to cater to its growing population and encourage youth participation in sports,” he said.
He noted that apart from Kanteerava Stadium, KSCA, and the Football Stadium, there are limited facilities in the city.
“When I was a Lok Sabha member, I had proposed allocating 100 acres in my constituency at Surya City. The land was later earmarked and the plan approved,” he added.
Suresh said he has discussed the project with Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan, Rajiv Gandhi Housing Corporation Chairman Shivalingegowda, and Anekal MLA Shivanna.
“The Cabinet has now approved the project, and a stadium will be developed on around 50–60 acres,” he said.
He further added that he has requested the Deputy Chief Minister to build another stadium at Shivarama Karanth Layout through the BDA, where 40 acres have been allocated. Plans are also being discussed to develop a well-equipped stadium in Bidadi.
Commending state government's recent bilingual policy move, Suresh said forcing children to learn three languages could affect their comprehension.
“It is a good decision to make two languages compulsory. Learning a third language should be left to the choice of students and parents,” he said.
Responding to criticism from BJP leaders, he said their tendency is to oppose every decision of the government.
“To please their central leadership, they take a pro-Hindi stance. Instead, they should advocate for the adoption of Kannada in all states,” he said.
When asked about the earlier three-language policy under Congress, he said, “the situation is different now. Today, the focus should be on quality learning. Kannada should remain the primary language, while students and parents can choose an additional language.”
