India spares no occasion to criticize the administration of countries such as Australia or America when Indians living there are attacked, calling it nothing less than ‘racism’. The government seems to believe that such incidents of communal hatred have to be condemned only when they happen on foreign soil. The exploitation and abuse of labourers from North Karnataka don’t come under this purview when they happen on the soil of southern part of the state. Why don’t the incidents of assault on labourers coming from places like Vijayapura and surrounding areas come to Mangaluru or Bengaluru for work, count as racism? Why doesn’t the state government pay heed to this and have a legal framework to protect their interests in place? The situation of labourers who move from north Karnataka to south, or to Mumbai from Bihar and to Gujarat from states such as Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh or any others.

In some way, more than those who leave the country in search of jobs; the situation of migrant labourers within their own country is more miserable to the core. A lot of them are being assaulted feeding into the rumour of ‘child lifters’. Their looks, language and culture set them apart from the locals. We often forget that our own people have also left our state and are earning their bread elsewhere. We show such intolerance towards Tamils, Telugus and Malayalis. However, this selective rage is never on the rich and elite. This is restricted to tea stall owners, car drives, labourers, hawkers etc.

We often run them down in an attempt to feel superior to them. We deem the Marathi people villains only when they attack Kannadigas living there. We want migrant labourers to do menial jobs for us but we prefer to keep them away from us. Our buildings can be built by those, but our gates will always remain closed for them. We perceive them as robbers, theifs and rapists when we are forced to trust them. The recent developments in Gujarat are an excellent example of this. The locals blamed a labourer, also a Bihari immigrant, of sexually assaulting a minor girl in the afternoon of September 28, 2018.

Soon after, series of assaults were unleashed upon the Biharis and north Indian immigrant labourers. Ruling BJP blamed Congress and Khatri Sena’s Alpesh Thakur as forces behind this evil attack. Even the sexual assault victim was said to be from Thakur community. From there things took a different social turn and this was used as an occasion to get even with the immigrant community that was stealing their jobs. Immigrant exodus began in hoards since violence was unleashed on labourers from other states. This naturally affected the industries and many sectors including real estate which uses their services heavily for their day-to-day work.

The industrialists began to request the politicians and leaders of the communities to check this trend and ensure the labourers didn’t flee the state. Protection was provided to industries that had employed labourers to ensure smooth flow of work and projects. The Industries and Commerce Federation of Gujarat requested intervention of Gujarat CM into the matter. This matter had to be resolved urgently since the investors’ conference was going to be initiated soon in 2019 January. Guj govt didn’t want the festive season to be affected along with industries suffering the ordeal.  

This problem may be sorted soon. But that will provide no respite from the problems faced by migrant labourers. Their situation would be far worse than that of locals working in the same category. They do not even have negotiating power on salaries or benefits with their employers. They do not get representation on labour unions because of their immigrant status. They would like to come under the banner of some institution for their safety and welfare. The country and ruling dispensation should have more humane approach towards their plight and help them find a solution. There has to be some parameters in place to safeguard their lives when riots break out. It is a fundamental right. We must not treat them like a use-and-throw option to suit our requirements.   

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Bengaluru: Bengaluru Milk Union Ltd President D.K. Suresh on Monday said it is inappropriate for MLAs to seek free IPL tickets, adding that those interested in watching matches should pay for them personally.

Speaking to reporters near his residence in Sadashivanagar, he said, “IPL is a commercial tournament and does not represent the country. It is not right for public representatives to focus too much on such matters.”

Referring to the recent controversy during the RCB celebrations, he said, “let us find out who benefited the most from the statements made during the incident.” He also pointed out that BJP MLAs had received IPL tickets as well.

Responding to discussions about relocating the Chinnaswamy Stadium, Suresh said the government has already approved the construction of a new stadium at a location he had proposed.

“I had suggested building a stadium in Surya City and submitted a proposal for it. Bengaluru needs four stadiums in four directions to cater to its growing population and encourage youth participation in sports,” he said.

He noted that apart from Kanteerava Stadium, KSCA, and the Football Stadium, there are limited facilities in the city.

“When I was a Lok Sabha member, I had proposed allocating 100 acres in my constituency at Surya City. The land was later earmarked and the plan approved,” he added.

Suresh said he has discussed the project with Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan, Rajiv Gandhi Housing Corporation Chairman Shivalingegowda, and Anekal MLA Shivanna.

“The Cabinet has now approved the project, and a stadium will be developed on around 50–60 acres,” he said.

He further added that he has requested the Deputy Chief Minister to build another stadium at Shivarama Karanth Layout through the BDA, where 40 acres have been allocated. Plans are also being discussed to develop a well-equipped stadium in Bidadi.

Commending state government's recent bilingual policy move, Suresh said forcing children to learn three languages could affect their comprehension.

“It is a good decision to make two languages compulsory. Learning a third language should be left to the choice of students and parents,” he said.

Responding to criticism from BJP leaders, he said their tendency is to oppose every decision of the government.

“To please their central leadership, they take a pro-Hindi stance. Instead, they should advocate for the adoption of Kannada in all states,” he said.

When asked about the earlier three-language policy under Congress, he said, “the situation is different now. Today, the focus should be on quality learning. Kannada should remain the primary language, while students and parents can choose an additional language.”