Fancy dress at the Red Fort
Fancy dress competitions used to be held in schools and colleges so far. students used to dress up like Bhagat Singh, Subhash Chandra Bose and other national leaders shout Jai Hind get uploaded for the performance and win hearts. But one cannot become those leaders the moment you wear the dress. Once you get down from the stage you have to change it. Ok app does not make you a believer of Bose like the broom will not make you were Gandhi follower and the short does not make you the Iron Man like Patel. If one believes all these metaphors can make them great leaders it would best be called an Illusion of a fertile mind.
The speech that Prime Minister Narendra Modi deliver from Red Fort on the occasion of 75th anniversary of Subhash Chandra Bose's Azad Hind resembled one such fancy dress competitions. Subhash Chandra Bose played very important role in the freedom fight of this country. Though he did not believe in the non violence Subhash Chandra Bose had great regard and respect for leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi. do Gandhi did not agree with Bose noise of fighting the British deep down he nursed great respect for the leader.
Subhash Chandra Bose's choice to drive the British away was more or less like riding the tiger. Bose’s travel to Germany and join hands with Hitler. He had planned to change the British out by second world war with the help of Hitler. He built a separate Army for the purpose. The army was a secular one because Hindus and Muslims together join hands with bows to fight the British. Jai Hind was coined by Zain Ul Abideen a very close confidant of Bose. He joined Bose's struggle for freedom fight after quitting his engineering education midway. He left Behind everything for the call of freedom. Hence it is our duty to remember him on the 75th anniversary of Azad Hind.but the speech delivered by Prime Minister Narendra Modi gives rise to the doubt whether he used Red Fort to further drive his ‘hate Nehru’ agenda into people's minds.
While he remembered the sacrifices made by Bose and other prominent leaders Modi kept reiterating that only one family was getting all prominence in this country. No one in the country believes that the nation is only indebted to Jawaharlal Nehru. Bose and Nehru had different personalities. Bose's choice of road to freedom was not a sustainable one. Hitler was a dictator. Enter achieved freedom by using one Dictator against another was a very complicated thinking. Boys had a very soft stance about authoritarianism. He believed India was not prepared for democracy even after few years into its independence.
Bose failed in his chosen route. Nehru fought for independence and he even became the architect of modern India with is farsightedness in growing agriculture industry science technology and other areas. He took the India that was destroyed by internal bickerings towards the path of progress. For somebody who occupies the chair of prime minister to put two leaders against each other and compare them to divide and other one is not something that's very dignifying.
Fernandes when Bose was building Azad Hind Cena one of the organisations who would stop him from doing so was Hindu Mahasabha as well. Vinayak Damodar Savarkar or any other leaders on the Hindu brigade never joined hands with any of the freedom fighters. So if the Prime Minister wants to reconstruct history by adding false information to it it does not pay any respects to the departed leader. Let's consider Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. Modi government things they are paying greatest respect to the leader by erecting his biggest statue. Patel was always seen with Gandhij and identified with Gandhiji path to freedom. Mahatma Gandhi tried to bill the whole Nation on the value of ahimsa. But now the whole world knows what Modi is opinion is about ahimsa.
Patel brought the country together emotionally and geographical e under the leadership of Nehru. But RSS had lied to Patel that they would take part only in cultural manner broke its promise and ensured the ban on them was withdrawn. Today they play a role that totally contradictory to what they stood for, then. The statue is a cross that stands on the grave of Patel and it is no great respect that Modi is showing towards Patel.
If Modi really respect leaders like both Patel and others the first thing he would do is to control the communal outfits in the country. He would also try to put a stop to the violence that increasing in the country. Without doing this if he wears was his cap and Gandhi is broom along with hotels shawl it measures mean that he is performing a brilliant fancy dress and people may merely applaud only for that.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Speaker rules out discussion on Guv''s conduct amid K''taka Assembly standoff
Bengaluru (PTI): In an effort to end the logjam over the Governor's address that has stalled proceedings for the past week, Karnataka Assembly Speaker U T Khader on Wednesday ruled that legislators should not discuss Thaawarchand Gehlot or his conduct in the house, saying such debates send the wrong message to the public.
The House has witnessed repeated disruptions and adjournments since the session began on January 22 over the issue of the governor's conduct.
During his address to the joint sitting of the Karnataka legislature on January 22, Gehlot read out only three sentences from the 122-paragraph speech prepared by the state government.
The speech included criticism of the Centre for replacing the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajivika Mission (Gramin) (VB-G RAM G), portions of which the governor declined to read.
Concluding his address in about two minutes, the governor left the house, triggering a commotion as Congress legislators attempted to gherao him and raised slogans.
While the opposition BJP accused the ruling Congress and its ministers of "insulting" the governor and demanded action, the treasury benches countered by claiming the governor had "insulted the National Anthem by leaving before it was played."
The house again witnessed heated arguments on the issue earlier in the day, leading to adjournment.
During the interruption, Khader held a meeting with ministers and opposition members to resolve the impasse.
When proceedings resumed, the speaker delivered his ruling.
Referring to the events of January 22 and the subsequent debate, Khader said the conduct and discussions had conveyed the wrong message to the public.
"Our conduct as members of this House and the opinions expressed must be in good taste and in accordance with constitutional provisions. They must uphold the dignity of the House and its members. We must introspect in this direction," he said.
He stressed the need for caution to ensure that such incidents are not repeated in the future.
"Let us end this matter here, continue the discussion on the motion of thanks to the governor, and refrain from discussing the governor or his conduct in this house," the speaker said.
Leader of the Opposition R Ashoka said the house should express regret over what he termed an "insult" to the governor.
Responding, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said the situation would not have arisen had the governor read out the entire address.
"Asking the house to express regret is not appropriate. Why did the governor leave even before the National Anthem was played," Siddaramaiah asked.
BJP MLA S Suresh Kumar reminded Siddaramaiah that as Leader of the Opposition in 2011, he had asked then Governor Hansraj Bhardwaj to curtail his address.
Bhardwaj had subsequently placed the address on the table of the house, requesting members to treat it as read.
Siddaramaiah said the situation in January 2011 was different from the present one.
The debate grew intense, leading to another adjournment of the house.
