Fire that burnt constitution may reduce nation to cinders
Communal forces have been conspiring to destroy the pluralist India that nourishes so many cultures and languages. The same forces have burnt the copy of Indian constitution. This constitution that provides for the foundation of secular India was prepared under the leadership of Dr B R Ambedkar. This is being widely appreciated by the whole world. This constitution has brought rays of hope to millions of people across the economic spectrum in this country. But then, for those forces which want to turn this country into a living model of regressive ideology propounded by Manu, this constitution has turned into a stumbling block. Hence, they have been conspiring to destroy it bit by bit, one step at a time.
The communal forces cannot appreciate the fact that this country stands on the tenets of secularism and tolerance. They do not want the constitution since they want to make this nation a hindu rashtra with a single faith. They do not want this constitution that allows everyone equal opportunity. And this is not a recent development. This machination has been on since the time Ambedkar sat down to create the constitution. During the time that he drafted this constitution, he was subjected to various kinds of humiliation both inside and outside the Parliament.
On one hand, there is a conspiracy to create a single faith country by burning the constitution. On the other, there are instances of increased violence against innocents and shudras in the name of cow protection or Gau Raksha. There is mounting pressure on them to follow a single faith or adhere to a culture prescribed by certain category. If this is resisted, the self-appointed protectors of culture will launch an attack on those people and their families, sometimes even getting down to murdering such persons.
The attackers are unmindful of the law and order situation in the country. They would not even consider the existence of police and other security forces that is for the general public. They are nationalists and they believe that gives them the edge over the others for any pervert act.
When some famous persons said there is intolerance in the nation, a massive controversy was raked up. They were asked to leave the nation, if they felt they didn’t belong here. They were issued life threats too. But then, if these acts of burning the constitution, or attacking the innocents under the guise of protecting the dharma are not instances of intolerance, what else do they indicate?
Govind Pansare, Narendra Dabholkar, M M Kalburgi and Gauri Lankesh were murdered because the levels of intolerance are rising in the country. They died because they spoke against the superstition and violence and intolerance of communists. These murders are attempts to create an atmosphere of fear in the society.
It is the duty of every Indian to follow the aspects of constitution. If he or she opposes them, it goes against the law. Constitution is the only sacred book for this nation. Going against its spirit is as good as carrying out illegal acts. Such people should be tried under the law and government should ensure such acts do not repeat.
Today, there is a need to protect the constitution since people are engaged in defying and disrespecting it. It is the duty of every citizen. The constitution has given equal rights to every citizen to live a safe and good life. Our country’s constitution has the best of every country’s values and ideals. This is the foundation of our life. We must never forget that.
We need to eradicate this fearful atmosphere and allow peace and tranquility to exist amidst us. We need the Constitution to build the nation for better and safe future.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Inappropriate for MLAs seeking free IPL tickets, says D.K. Suresh
Bengaluru: Bengaluru Milk Union Ltd President D.K. Suresh on Monday said it is inappropriate for MLAs to seek free IPL tickets, adding that those interested in watching matches should pay for them personally.
Speaking to reporters near his residence in Sadashivanagar, he said, “IPL is a commercial tournament and does not represent the country. It is not right for public representatives to focus too much on such matters.”
Referring to the recent controversy during the RCB celebrations, he said, “let us find out who benefited the most from the statements made during the incident.” He also pointed out that BJP MLAs had received IPL tickets as well.
Responding to discussions about relocating the Chinnaswamy Stadium, Suresh said the government has already approved the construction of a new stadium at a location he had proposed.
“I had suggested building a stadium in Surya City and submitted a proposal for it. Bengaluru needs four stadiums in four directions to cater to its growing population and encourage youth participation in sports,” he said.
He noted that apart from Kanteerava Stadium, KSCA, and the Football Stadium, there are limited facilities in the city.
“When I was a Lok Sabha member, I had proposed allocating 100 acres in my constituency at Surya City. The land was later earmarked and the plan approved,” he added.
Suresh said he has discussed the project with Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan, Rajiv Gandhi Housing Corporation Chairman Shivalingegowda, and Anekal MLA Shivanna.
“The Cabinet has now approved the project, and a stadium will be developed on around 50–60 acres,” he said.
He further added that he has requested the Deputy Chief Minister to build another stadium at Shivarama Karanth Layout through the BDA, where 40 acres have been allocated. Plans are also being discussed to develop a well-equipped stadium in Bidadi.
Commending state government's recent bilingual policy move, Suresh said forcing children to learn three languages could affect their comprehension.
“It is a good decision to make two languages compulsory. Learning a third language should be left to the choice of students and parents,” he said.
Responding to criticism from BJP leaders, he said their tendency is to oppose every decision of the government.
“To please their central leadership, they take a pro-Hindi stance. Instead, they should advocate for the adoption of Kannada in all states,” he said.
When asked about the earlier three-language policy under Congress, he said, “the situation is different now. Today, the focus should be on quality learning. Kannada should remain the primary language, while students and parents can choose an additional language.”
