Floods being declared ‘national disaster’ would solve problem?
Kerala has been witness to the most devastating floods of the century. The last two weeks have been massive testing times for the ‘god’s own country’ with more than 300 declared dead and lakhs of people being displaced owing to torrential rains and gushing waters. PM Modi visited Kerala on Sunday for an aerial survey of the affected places and declared Rs 500 crore as interim relief. The ruling party, the opposition and the government of Kerala have together requested this to be declared a national disaster. There has been widespread support to this in social media too.
What do people expect from government when a disaster of this scale hits a state? Just an aid of Rs 500 crore? Or a tag of national disaster being associated with this devastating situation? How does that help? We had urged the central government in the past to declare Kannada a classical language. What is the situation of Kannada after that status was accorded? What impact has that status had on Kannada, its culture and its studies? No one has taken this into account after that.
The status of Kannada has remained unchanged after that. Today there is a widespread effort to impose Hindi on Kannada. In the same manner, we do have a declaration of ‘national disaster’ in circulation now. There is no legal interpretation to this word. Central government is already providing some aid and help in the form of resources to Kerala. Even if it is declared a national disaster, it would not make much of a difference to the situation right now.
The disaster management act 2000 is part of larger scheme. Even then, there is no scope to declare this a national disaster. Natural disasters cannot be classified as state, national or local ones. According to the senior expert in National Disaster Management expert Anil Gupta, managing natural disasters is the responsibility of state government. The state government can only provide aid during such situation. But the central government is vested with the power to declare a national disaster. But the state govt has to seek aid from central government for this and then the centre can act accordingly.
Though national disaster has no particular meaning to it whether legal or administrational, our politicians have been repeatedly using this word time and again without understanding its full meaning. Even when floods ravaged Gujarat, Bihar, Assam and W Bengal and Jammu and Kashmir in the past, they were not declared national disasters. PM Narendra Modi had used this term for the first time in 2014. But the death and destruction in 2017 Bihar floods was much higher than whatever happened in Jammu Kashmir is a different point altogether.
National Disaster Management Authority laid out a scheme to manage disaster in 2016. It has clearly classified the types of disasters. Any disaster that can be managed with resources at district level, it is level one type of disaster. If the state has to employ its state level resources to manage the situation, it is level 2 disaster. If the calamity is of very large scale, and the state cannot manage it, it becomes a level 3 disaster. Central government has always adapted step motherly treatment about flood relief distribution to states. In 2013, the floods that ravaged Uttarakhand and the following landslides had left 5700 people dead.
The Manmohan Singh government had then provided an aid of Rs 1,000 cr to the state. Though the number of people who died in Tamil Nadu floods was lesser than that in 2015, central government had provided almost same amount of help – Rs 939.6 cr. Now, central government is exhibiting its myopic approach in Kerala too. The centre had declared Rs 100 cr to Kerala at the initial stages of the flood. It had also said the state had enough funds in its disaster management corpus. After this was criticized widely, Modi government declared another Rs 500 crore aid for the state. Now, the centre has called this a disaster of grave nature, and is trying to pacify south Indians. Yet, one fails to understand why the centre isn’t moved by this ‘grave situation’ and proving more aid for the state.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Kuldeep, Vipraj spin masterclass helps DC restrict RCB to 163/7
Bengaluru, Apr 10 (PTI): The wizardry of spinners Kuldeep Yadav and Vipraj Nigam helped Delhi Capitals stage a stirring comeback to restrict Royal Challengers Bengaluru to a below-par 163 for seven in the IPL match here on Thursday.
Left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep (2/17) and leg-spinner Nigam (2/18) adjusted their lengths beautifully on a pitch that had a touch of sluggishness to drag RCB innings into a marshy pit after the Capitals chose to bowl first.
But Delhi's decision to field looked utterly obtuse as Royal Challengers went off the blocks like a galloping horse, going past the 50-run mark in just three overs.
Central to that charge was opener Phil Salt's turbo-charged innings of 37 off 17 balls.
The England batter hammered Mitchell Starc for a sequence of 6, 4, 4, 4, 6 to collect 24 runs in the third over.
However, Salt got run out in a yes-no situation involving Virat Kohli (22, 14b). Kohli and Salt added 61 runs off 24 balls for the opening stand.
But the introduction of leg-spinner Vipraj Nigam proved a course-altering point.
Nigam gave away just two runs in the fifth over, and pacer Mohit Sharma followed that up with another tidy few balls in the next over.
Pressurised by a series of dot balls, Devdutt Padikkal (1) went for a release shot off Mohit, but it lacked any kinetic energy as Axar Patel completed an easy catch at the edge of the circle.
Kohli, who began to unshackle himself with a six off Nigam over long-on, soon fell to the same bowler while trying to clobber a delivery wide on the off-stump.
Thereafter, the home side lost the wickets of Jitesh Sharma (4) and Liam Livingstone (3) in quick succession as they slipped to 102 for five in the 13th over, a far cry from the start they had.
In fact, the hosts lost five wickets for a mere 41 runs in just over eight overs, as DC bowlers exploited a hint grip on the surface to telling effect.
The passage between overs 6th and 13th also saw RCB batters managing just two fours and a six.
However, The RCB camp might have harboured some hopes of reaching a much more competitive total through skipper Rajat Patidar, who played a couple of delectable shots.
But Kuldeep’s skidder ended Patidar's stay (25) as stumper KL Rahul safely held the ball which almost touched the moon and came back.
Tim David (37 not out, 20b) played a few customary beefy shots in the death overs but it came a wee bit late as RCB's innings ended on a sad note of what could have been.
