How Politicians Are Dumping Government Hospitals For Private Luxuries
A successful hotelier is making a roaring business but prefers to dine at a luxurious hotel close by for fear of risking his health if he ate at his hotel. This analogy can be applied to our leaders who are doing exactly the same as the hotelier. Several leaders including Chief Minister Yediyurappa and Leader of the Opposition Siddaramaiah are now infected with the Coronavirus. Union Home Minister Amit Shah is in quarantine. It is difficult for leaders who are in public life to escape the Coronavirus infection despite taking precautions. It is therefore inhuman to mock at them for getting infected as though it is a crime. Unlike humans, the coronavirus does not differentiate people on the basis of their social status or economic standing but considers everyone equal. Leaders seen in public life are more prone to getting infected; at the same time, it is not appropriate for political leaders to hide themselves at home wary of the virus. But what has attracted criticism are the developments that have followed.
Instead of choosing government hospitals to get quarantined, all the infected leaders have chosen private hospitals. It has been only in the recent past that private hospitals have opened their doors for quarantine purposes. As the epidemic can infect anyone, the demand has been to provide the same treatment for both the rich and the poor. The country will not be free of the Coronavirus if the rich recover from the disease and the poor remain infected. If the coronavirus gains entry to the households of the poor, it can easily infect the rich living close by. Many experts have already demanded that the treatment for the Coronavirus and the quarantine facilities should be the same for the rich and the poor. But by opting for private hospitals, our political leaders have proven that the treatment for the Coronavirus is different in government and private hospitals.
It was important that political leaders choose government hospitals for treatment not only to create awareness about the facilities in government hospitals but also to instill confidence among the people about the government hospitals. With the fear of political leaders choosing government facilities, government hospitals would have started clearing their mess and putting things in order. The act of ministers who repeatedly issue statements that ‘everything is fine in government hospitals but choose private hospitals for their treatment is similar to the analogy of the hotelier where the hotelier is indirectly accepting that the food in his hotel is not good.
After the onset of the Coronavirus, a situation has been created where people are not able to visit government hospitals to get treatment for other diseases. The media has been reporting that those infected with the Coronavirus and those with other diseases are forced to stay together in government hospitals. This mess in government hospitals is said to be the reason for the rapid spread of the Coronavirus. Such allegations gain credence when political leaders show their lack of confidence in government hospitals for their treatment. Some time ago, the judiciary had asked why government officials and people’s representatives can’t enroll their children in government schools. It is now an opportune time to ask the question more aggressively.
The quality of services in government institutions can be improved only if people’s representatives and government officials compulsorily use government schools and government hospitals. If it becomes inevitable that their children ought to study in government schools, politicians might pay attention to the state of the government schools. But our leaders don’t have the morality and ethics to send their children to schools that their governments run. Even teachers working in government schools hesitate to send their children to government schools and enroll them in private schools either openly or in secrecy. The only way that people’s representatives will pay any attention to government hospitals and government schools is when it is made inevitable for them to get treatment in government hospitals and also to enact a law to make children of their family study in government schools.
This could be beneficial in two ways. One, leaders will then pay attention to government hospitals and schools and the irregularities taking place in these institutions will reduce. This would also lead to rich politicians thinking twice before entering politics which would be the second benefit. When this happens, it could also lead to the opening of opportunities for those committed to the welfare of the country to enter the political arena. It appears that courts need to be approached to formulate relevant laws in this direction. If political leaders take exception to this, people should hit the streets and demand from their leaders answers to uncomfortable questions around their hesitation to avail themselves with government services.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
BJP worker’s 16-year-old son allegedly casts eight votes in Uttar Pradesh’s Farrukhabad; Video viral
Lucknow (Farrukhabad): A viral video has surfaced showing a 16-year-old son of a BJP worker allegedly casting eight votes to the saffron party during the ongoing general elections in Uttar Pradesh. The video has sparked controversy, and the opposition has urged for prompt action from the Election Commission of India, reports scroll.in.
The video shared by the Samajwadi Party President Akhilesh Yadav on micro-blogging site ‘X’, showed the youngster recording himself while casting multiple times in a series of instances. The incident reportedly took place in Khiri Pamaran village, which falls under the Aliganj Assembly constituency within the Farrukhabad parliamentary seat. Mukesh Rajput, the sitting MP, is the BJP candidate in this constituency. Polling in Farrukhabad occurred on May 13 during the fourth phase of the general election.
In the viral video, the youngster is seen casting eight votes in total, all for the BJP, one by one with different clippings.
The youngster in the video has been identified as Rajan Singh Thakur, confirmed his father, Anil Singh Thakur to the Scroll.in. Anil Singh Thakur is the gram pradhan (village head) of Khiri Pamaran and a member of the BJP.
Anil defending his son told the Scroll that the ‘Video misrepresented his son,’ and claimed that the voting was done when the machine was being tested in some instances and other clipping of him voting on behalf of mentally and physically disabled voters was merged and made into a video.
Despite the Anil's caims, the video has drawn significant criticism. Subhash Chandra Prajapati, the additional district magistrate of Farrukhabad, confirmed to the Scroll that the administration will file a case soon. He mentioned that the returning officer is investigating the matter following a directive from the chief electoral officer in Lucknow.
The opposition has been vocal in its criticism, with Akhilesh Yadav demanding action from the Election Commission. In his social media post, Yadav accused the BJP of undermining the electoral process and described the party's booth committee as a "loot committee." The Congress party also called on the Election Commission to take action, in a ‘X’ post the party wrote, “Dear Election Commission…are you watching..a boy is voting 8-8 times ... .at least wake up now.”
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, took to ‘X’ to express, “Fearing and seeing their defeat, the BJP is attempting to undermine democracy by pressuring government machinery to deny the mandate. The Congress expects all officers performing election duties to remember their constitutional responsibilities despite any pressure from those in power. Otherwise, once the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) bloc government is formed, actions will be taken to ensure that anyone will think ten times before violating their 'Oath to the Constitution'."
Following the video's circulation, Naval Kishor Shakya, the Samajwadi Party candidate in Farrukhabad, filed a complaint with the district election officer. Shakya's complaint alleges that Rajan Singh Thakur cast votes after snatching voter information slips from other voters and that he was assisted by Dinesh Thakur, the local police station's station house officer. Shakya has called for re-polling at the affected polling center.
In a related incident earlier in May, Gujarat Police arrested two BJP workers for allegedly casting bogus votes and live-streaming the act on social media in the Dahod constituency. The Election Commission conducted re-polling at the affected booth following the incident.
The opposition INDIA bloc, including the Congress and the Samajwadi Party, has repeatedly accused the Election Commission of failing to take prompt action against election model code of conduct violations.
अपनी हार सामने देख कर भाजपा जनादेश को झुठलाने के लिए सरकारी तंत्र पर दबाव बना कर लोकतंत्र को लूटना चाहती है।
— Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) May 19, 2024
कांग्रेस चुनावी ड्यूटी कर रहे सभी अधिकारियों से यह अपेक्षा करती है कि वो सत्ता के दबाव के सामने अपनी संवैधानिक ज़िम्मेदारी न भूलें।
वरना INDIA की सरकार बनते ही ऐसी… https://t.co/fk4wXL8QZy
