India pays for being pals with US
The reason behind India remembering Nehru often is that the first PM of our country laid down a strong foreign policy for the nation. He took the mid path when two most powerful nations tried to drag an independent India, in their stride.
Along with that, he took a soft stance on communism in Russia. India had gained enough stronghold to assume the power of command as the reckoning force of third front during Nehru and Indira Gandhi’s time. During this phase, Nehru’s foresightedness regarding foreign policy had played a major role, in post-independent India. But in the last two decades, India is in a confused state with no clear road map regarding this diplomatic matter.
The ones who rule us assume being close to America is our ticket to increase the country’s image and power. And even America has used this ‘illusion’ that India has been nourishing since long. Most of the economic crisis we are facing today are a result of our close bonding with the USA. A bungled up foreign policy is what leads to this consistent hike in petrol and diesel prices in India. Many argue that our country could have escaped the wrath of this situation had it exercised safe distance from America in view of the sanctions USA has imposed on Iran.
American president Donald Trump had imposed sanctions against Iran in view of the failed nuclear agreement with Iran. India had reduced its buying of fuel from Iran after that. Even USA pressurized India not to warm up with Iran. Though oil company CEOs had said it is not possible to meet the supply demand in the country without being in good terms with Iran, and get our regular supply of oil. The central ministry did not think through to understand the repercussions of such a decision on the political scenario.
The country has still not been able to nail its stance on Iran, after the sanctions were imposed. We don’t even know whether we can reduce our dependency on Iran for fuel needs. India may request US to allow us to continue buying fuel from Iran. And US may hold out a carrot of assuring to reduce duty on exports to the US from here. Ever since Republican Donald Trump assumed office, he has been opposing nuclear deal with Iran. Indian Foreign Policy office had been preparing a plan to reduce the country’s fuel dependency on Iran since that time. But India’s relationship with Iran is not restricted to fuel alone and has larger significance as far as international politics is concerned.
Modi govt chose to ignore that aspect. While Trump retreated unilaterally from nuclear agreement with Iran, he also had India getting stuck in a very tricky situation.
American President had directed the ‘friends of US’ including India to cut off trade relations with Iran. Now having done that, US has not only restricted India’s fuel supply from Iran but also indirectly meddled with the nation’s foreign security policy.
In the last 12 years after India entered into nuclear agreement with the US, a lot of changes have happened in the nations’ approach towards each other. Modi has visited America more than any other foreign leader in the world. Even Obama administration had shown warmth and cooperation with India. But then the same nation had suggested that India backs out from the deal of India, Pakistan and Iran’s plan to lay gas pipeline to benefit all the three nations.
But then this is a massive blow for India which is already reeling under massive damage caused by demonetization and GST implementation.
Any reduction in buying oil from Iran or looking for another source of oil is going to have a heavy impact in the coming days. A cursory glance reveals there are no chances of oil prices coming down in the near future.
In case India loses a good relationship it shares with Iran, it may take ages for the nation to regain confidence in this space. Iran had taken India’s side in many a fora of Islamic nations. India’s decision, if it happens, to ruin a well formed bond with another resourceful nation which never damaged the country would mean self-harming of interests for India.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Speaker rules out discussion on Guv''s conduct amid K''taka Assembly standoff
Bengaluru (PTI): In an effort to end the logjam over the Governor's address that has stalled proceedings for the past week, Karnataka Assembly Speaker U T Khader on Wednesday ruled that legislators should not discuss Thaawarchand Gehlot or his conduct in the house, saying such debates send the wrong message to the public.
The House has witnessed repeated disruptions and adjournments since the session began on January 22 over the issue of the governor's conduct.
During his address to the joint sitting of the Karnataka legislature on January 22, Gehlot read out only three sentences from the 122-paragraph speech prepared by the state government.
The speech included criticism of the Centre for replacing the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajivika Mission (Gramin) (VB-G RAM G), portions of which the governor declined to read.
Concluding his address in about two minutes, the governor left the house, triggering a commotion as Congress legislators attempted to gherao him and raised slogans.
While the opposition BJP accused the ruling Congress and its ministers of "insulting" the governor and demanded action, the treasury benches countered by claiming the governor had "insulted the National Anthem by leaving before it was played."
The house again witnessed heated arguments on the issue earlier in the day, leading to adjournment.
During the interruption, Khader held a meeting with ministers and opposition members to resolve the impasse.
When proceedings resumed, the speaker delivered his ruling.
Referring to the events of January 22 and the subsequent debate, Khader said the conduct and discussions had conveyed the wrong message to the public.
"Our conduct as members of this House and the opinions expressed must be in good taste and in accordance with constitutional provisions. They must uphold the dignity of the House and its members. We must introspect in this direction," he said.
He stressed the need for caution to ensure that such incidents are not repeated in the future.
"Let us end this matter here, continue the discussion on the motion of thanks to the governor, and refrain from discussing the governor or his conduct in this house," the speaker said.
Leader of the Opposition R Ashoka said the house should express regret over what he termed an "insult" to the governor.
Responding, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said the situation would not have arisen had the governor read out the entire address.
"Asking the house to express regret is not appropriate. Why did the governor leave even before the National Anthem was played," Siddaramaiah asked.
BJP MLA S Suresh Kumar reminded Siddaramaiah that as Leader of the Opposition in 2011, he had asked then Governor Hansraj Bhardwaj to curtail his address.
Bhardwaj had subsequently placed the address on the table of the house, requesting members to treat it as read.
Siddaramaiah said the situation in January 2011 was different from the present one.
The debate grew intense, leading to another adjournment of the house.
