JNU incident: Chargesheet has questions that have no answers
The incident of JNU student leaders Kanhaiya Kumar, Umar Khalid, Anirban Bhattacharya and seven others allegedly shouting anti-national slogans in the precincts of JNU campus in 2016 has again come to light with Delhi police drawing up the chargesheet against them on Monday.
Kanhaiya Kumar was the president of student union when the incident happened. Delhi police have stated they have visual, oral and documentary evidence to prove their charges. This means Delhi police is saying the visual evidence of Kanhaiya Kumar leading the sloganeering students is with the police as of now.
The chargesheet states after the permission to observe the anniversary of parliament attack mastermind Afzal Guru who was hanged eventually, was denied by the administration of the JNU, a text message was received by Umar Khalid and Kanhaiya Kumar to assemble at Sabarmati dhaba near the campus as per the charge sheet filed by Delhi police in the Patiala House Court a good three years after the incident.
But it is rather significant to note that the senior officers have said they do not possess direct documentary evidence to insinuate Kanhaiya Kumar shouting slogans, that can be termed as sedition . Though Zee news had aired the footage that showed someone shouting slogans, it was later said that this was not a genuine video. The channel now carries the reputation of having aired concocted footage to fix certain people.
Some parts of the video footages were obtained by those who were present at the venue. Officers have said some of the persons who were present when the incident occurred, had also testified to prove the charges against the accused. The court has noted the witnesses and their statements along with those of the police under relevant sections under CrPC.
Just as the Lok Sabha elections draw close, this filing of chargesheet against Kanhaiya Kumar and his friends has given rise to many doubts regarding the motive behind this act. How does a message from Khalid to Kanhaiya amount to sedition? Does the video footage possessed by the police show Kanhaiya Kumar shouting slogans against the country. Was he seen encouraging the students who were shouting anti national slogans? None of these questions can get clear answers from the Delhi police.
The chargesheet does not have clear details of calls made and received by Kanhaiya Kumar. The chargesheet does not explain where the phone was after and before the incident of shouting of anti national slogans or the subsequent clashes that broke out.
On the other hand, the police has not provided any incriminating evidence to prove Kanhaiya Kumar's role or crime in the whole incident. His name has not been recorded as the organiser of the event after the administration denied the permission to hold the event on the campus.
The police has decided to take action against Kanhaiya and his accomplices only after doctored videos by some channels were aired that showed him shouting slogans. But there has been no mention of doctored videos making rounds after the incident.
The case seems to be hanging on a lot of loose ends that may be difficult to be proven. Now despite knowing that this case may not hold water, if the police have still gone ahead and taken it to the court only to stop Kanhaiya and his friends from participating in the Lok Sabha elections, this must surely be a case of necessity of someone.
The name is pretty much know and is highly predictable by now. Narendra Modi has been rattled by the CBI and other investigating agencies.
Whatever be the case, this decision will turn to be favourable for Kanhaiya. With this, Modi has laid bare his fears and insecurities before the whole country.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
RJD surprise element in J’khand polls, party candidates leading in 5 of 6 assembly seats
Ranchi(PTI): The Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) has emerged as a surprise element in the Jharkhand assembly elections with its candidates leading in five of the six seats where the party is contesting, according to trends available on the Election Commission's website on Saturday.
RJD candidates in five assembly seats were leading over sitting BJP legislators.
In 2019, RJD had secured only the Chatra seat where its nominee Satyanand Bhokta won.
In Deoghar, RJD’s Suresh Paswan was leading by 19,581 votes over his nearest rival and BJP's sitting MLA Narayan Das after the third round of counting.
RJD’s Sanjay Prasad Yadav was ahead by 19,867 votes in Godda over BJP MLA Amit Kumar Mandal after the sixth round of counting.
In Koderma, RJD nominee Subhash Prasad Yadav, who was out on bail, was leading by a margin of 3,471 votes over BJP’s sitting legislator Neera Yadav.
Subhas Prasad Yadav, considered to be one of the close aides of RJD supremo Lalu Prasad, was recently granted bail by the Supreme Court in a money laundering case.
Party’s Naresh Prasad Singh was leading by 5,159 votes after the fourth round of counting over BJP’s Bishrampur MLA Ramchandra Chandravanshi.
RJD's Sanjay Kumar Singh Yadav was also leading from Hussainabad by 8,213 votes after the fourth round of counting over BJP MLA Kamlesh Kumar Singh.
Party’s candidate Rashmi Prakash, however, was trailing from Chatra by 3,776 votes.
Bhokta did not contest the elections this time, and his daughter-in-law Prakash was given a ticket.
