Karnataka’s Rajya Sabha choices: Questions Remain
Four candidates have been elected unanimously to the Rajya Sabha from the Karnataka in the biennial polls held recently. A matter of consolation this time is that all the four are from Karnataka. Political parties have for long used the Rajya Sabha for the back-door entry of candidates who cannot win direct elections to the hallowed portals of Parliament. Political parties also strangely hold the view that Rajya Sabha members from a state need not be from that state, which helped many candidates from other states to get elected to the Rajya Sabha from Karnataka. And more often than not, the contribution of such candidates to Karnataka has been zero. In fact, many Rajya Sabha MPs elected from the state have spoken in favor of other states such as Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. As this trend had drawn the ire of Kannada organizations in the past, political parties have now started giving a serious thought to the selection of candidates.
Of the four candidates elected this time, two are senior leaders from the JDS and the Congress and the other two representing the BJP are new faces. The BJP is taking credit for electing grass-root workers of the party to the Rajya Sabha. The JDS, however, claims that selecting local-level workers does not fulfill any objective if they are not able to effectively represent the state’s interest in the Rajya Sabha. The party’s argument is that those elected to the Rajya Sabha should be seasoned politicians who can raise their voices on the issues before the state. While there is a grain of truth in both the arguments, they are equally shallow.
In the Parliamentary system, the Lok Sabha is called as the Lower House and the Rajya Sabha, the Upper House, indicating the significance of both the houses. Though the Lower House plays a more decisive role in governance, the Upper House cannot be neglected. The Upper House exists to guide the Lower House and its functioning whose representatives are usually inexperienced and lack administrative acumen. It is therefore important that candidates to the Rajya Sabha have experience in different fields. If the Lok Sabha has to proceed in the right direction, experts in various fields, thinkers, and a collection of bright minds should be seated in the Rajya Sabha. Only then the objective of having a Rajya Sabha – the House of Elders – will be fulfilled. However, political parties have been using the Rajya Sabha membership as a reward to workers and leaders who cannot contest and win direct elections to the Lok Sabha and the Legislative Assembly.
There cannot be any doubt that Parliament needs seasoned politicians such as Mallikarjun Kharge of the Congress and Janata Dal’s Deve Gowda. The choice of the Congress and the JD(S) therefore makes good sense. At the same time, the BJP has done well by showing the powerful lobbies of senior leaders their place and by favouring two hitherto unknown district-level functionaries. But the decision of all the three parties raise many questions.
If the BJP were to give an opportunity for ordinary party workers to contest Lok Sabha or Assembly elections, the decision could have been lauded. But how fair is the party’s stand of giving ‘tickets to the winning candidates’ during Lok Sabha and Assembly elections and ‘recognizing party workers’ when it comes to selecting candidates for Rajya Sabha elections? Doesn’t the selection of inexperienced persons to the Rajya Sabha defeat the purpose of the Upper House which is meant to be the preserve of the seasoned and the experienced? How far will such inexperienced party workers succeed in guiding the young MPs in Lok Sabha?
At the same time, how valid is the stand of the JDS that it had made the right choice in Deve Gowda? No doubt, Deve Gowda has on many occasions effectively fought for the interests of the state in Parliament, including the Cauvery river issue. However, now he is on the threshold of 87 years. Will his age not work against him? Does it mean that the party is openly admitting that it has a paucity of seasoned politicians other than the former prime minister? With the Corona virus spreading all over the country, health experts are warning that it is dangerous for senior citizens to be active in public. If the Congress and JDS had encouraged and groomed youngsters, would they have been facing the situation of having to choose aged politicians with health issues?
BJP has in its fold several seasoned and experienced thinkers and politicians. The party could have given its grass-roots workers ticket to contest the Lok Sabha or Assembly seats and sent seasoned politicians to the Rajya Sabha. The JDS, on the other hand, could have selected a candidate such as former MLA Y.S.V. Dutta to the Rajya Sabha instead of imposing on Deve Gowda the pressures of being a Rajya Sabha member. Of all the candidates selected to the Rajya Sabha, the selection of Kharge seems fair but at 77, the age is a factor to be considered in his case too. The Congress should also identify and recognize other seasoned leaders who can take Kharge’s place.
When it is becoming increasingly important for the Rajya Sabha to include experienced and seasoned political faces to correct the Lok Sabha which is going astray because of its financial might, it is difficult to accept the selection of these four candidates.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
London, Nov 22: A bomb disposal squad deployed as a “precaution” to the South Terminal of Gatwick Airport concluded an investigation into a "security incident" on Friday after making a “suspect package” safe.
The South Terminal of Gatwick Airport, the UK's second busiest airport after Heathrow, which was briefly shut owing to the incident reopened following the incident.
The Gatwick is around 45 km south of London.
Two people detained during the enquiries have since been allowed to continue their journey as the airport was opened.
“Police have concluded their investigation into a report of a suspect package at Gatwick Airport. Officers from the EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) team made the package safe, and the airport has been handed back to its operator,” Sussex Police said in an updated statement.
“Two people detained while enquiries were ongoing have subsequently been allowed to continue their journeys. There will remain an increased police presence in the area to assist with passengers accessing the South Terminal for onward travel,” the statement added.
Earlier on Friday, the incident caused severe disruption at the busy airport’s South Terminal, while the North Terminal of Gatwick Airport remained unaffected.
“Police were called to the South Terminal at Gatwick Airport at 8.20 am on Friday (November 22) following the discovery of a suspected prohibited item in luggage,” a Sussex Police statement said.
“To ensure the safety of the public, staff and other airport users, a security cordon has been put in place whilst the matter is dealt with. As a precaution, an EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) team is being deployed to the airport. This is causing significant disruption and some roads around the South Terminal have been closed. We’d advise the public to avoid the area where possible,” it said.
Footage on social media taken outside the airport showed crowds of frustrated travellers being moved away from the terminal building.
Gatwick said it was working hard to resolve the issue.
“A large part of the South Terminal has been evacuated as a precaution while we continue to investigate a security incident," the airport said in a social media post.
“Passengers will not be able to enter the South Terminal while this is ongoing. The safety and security of our passengers and staff remain our top priority. We are working hard to resolve the issue as quickly as possible.”
Train and bus services that serve the airport were also impacted while the police carried out their inquiries.
In an unrelated incident in south London on Friday morning, the US Embassy area in Nine Elms by the River Thames was the scene of a controlled explosion by Scotland Yard dealing with what they believe may have been a “hoax device”.
“We can confirm the 'loud bang' reported in the area a short time ago was a controlled explosion carried out by officers,” the Metropolitan Police said in a post on X.
“Initial indications are that the item was a hoax device. An investigation will now follow. Some cordons will remain in place for the time being but the majority of the police response will now be stood down,” it added.
