Finally, the date for celebrating democracy has been announced. In the given scenario, people fear the festivals in our country. Police come wielding lathis during any festival of any faith in the streets. Deputy Commissioner calls for ‘celebration of the festival’ in peaceful manner. Peace meetings are held time and again. Common people pray to god that the festival should end without any complications.
Right now, the festival that has been announced is that of the democracy. It is the festival of all festivals. Hence the country is looking forward to this with trepidation, excitement, anxiety and expectations. This time, the results of the election would decide the path the country would be taking, rather very clearly.
Hence people are tense about the results along with the incidents that are bound to happen during the elections. Former Election Commissioner has said money and violence will cross all limits this time. This is not a tough reality given the fact that people are getting killed even without any elections. Fake Cow protectors have donned the role of culture keepers and have taken law into their own hands. Hence people are worried about their whims during the election time.
Now all the parties are bent upon clinching the power somehow. Ambani and Modi have to return to power using whatever routes so that the Rafael issue does not turn into their waterloo. If they lose power, the Rafael ghost will hunt them down. Heads will roll inevitably. Hence this election is a do or die situation for major corporates as well. Hence the industrialists are bound to fund this election big time.
On this occasion, people are seeking votes in the name of sacrifices made by the army. This has to be called as an assault they are launching on the moral courage of soldiers. Election Commission has warned against this. But a BJP activist called Chakravarthy Sulibele has used the image of soldier Abhinandan to seek votes, attracting huge criticism.
According to him, even soldiers have to work for the BJP. “If you want to be like soldier Abhinandan, vote for BJP. That is your surgical strike” reads his social media message. Though this has been done blatantly, election commission has hardly taken cognizance of this. Why should the BJP seek votes in the name of a soldier and not in the name of Modi? Why has BJP reached this point?
BJP leaders cry hoarse about PM Narendra Modi developing this country and bringing it to a stage where the whole world is noticing the nation. Demonetisation was a success. GST has eased trade and businesses, country has opened up to digitalization – these are their claims. Why is BJP then not claiming demo as a success? The party could well take details of benefits of demonetization, and turn the endorsement into votes!
For instance, the details of how much black money was confiscated alone can help BJP sweep the polls. Modi is claiming that he has defeated terrorism. But what defence does he have to present to the data that the country has come under terrorist attack more number of times in last four years than before? Kashmir situation wasn’t this bad in the last four years. BJP sought votes over severed soldiers’ heads in 2014. People trusted them. They assumed BJP could do good to the valley and to soldiers.
But in 2019, our 40 soldiers lost their lives to a sole terrorist. Today Modi is wielding the power. If UPA was responsible for the terrorist act those days, today BJP should be held responsible for whatever happened today. What reason does Modi give for not being able to protect the soldiers? This government hasn’t been a great support to the soldiers. How do they go to people again seeking votes in the name of soldiers? Isn’t this a betrayal to the martyrs? No nation loving person would tolerate this. Hence BJP has to stop encashing the deaths of soldiers.
People’s responsibility does not end with criticizing political leaders alone. Corrupt voters are as much responsible for the situation the country is in now. The country is on the threshold of a democratic process. Voters have to help democracy succeed without falling for corruption or money or goodies. The vote that we cast would be deciding on the future of this country which has hundreds of years of history and sacrifice. The voters have to write the new future to this country in the perspective of the history.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Udupi (Karnataka) (PTI): The VHP on Saturday demanded the immediate withdrawal of a proposed amendment to the Karnataka Prevention of Slaughter and Preservation of Cattle Act, 2020, accusing the state government of weakening a law that has deterred illegal cattle transport.
The organisation's Go Raksha Wing, Karnataka South, has also announced district-level protests on December 8.
According to officials, the existing law mandates a bank guarantee for securing the release of vehicles seized for alleged illegal cattle transportation.
On December 4, the state Cabinet proposed an amendment enabling the release of such vehicles on an indemnity bond instead.
Addressing reporters in Udupi, VHP leader and Prantha Goraksha Pramukh Sunil K R, said the government's move amounted to "sympathy for cattle lifters" and claimed that it was part of broader actions "targeting Hindus".
He argued that the law in its current form is stringent and has played a crucial role in reducing incidents of illegal cattle transport and theft.
Under the Act, vehicles involved in offences can be surrendered and, upon conviction, permanently seized by authorities. "Diluting these provisions will embolden offenders," Sunil said.
The VHP leader warned that easing the process of vehicle release would not only encourage violators but also result in rising cruelty against cattle.
Sunil further claimed that the strict enforcement of the 2020 law had brought down cases of cattle-related offences significantly. Rolling back these provisions, he said, could reverse those gains and would lead to an increase in illegal transport.
He reiterated that the government must reconsider its decision and preserve the integrity of the existing law.
