Loss of face for central goverment
There has been a constant attack on constitutional organisations ever since Modi’s BJP government assumed power at the centre. Autonomous institutions have been meddled with constantly, pushing envelope to use them to settle vendettas and equations with the political opponents. One of the major examples of this lies in the fact that CBI chief Alok Kumar Verma was sent on compulsory leave in the recent times. Verma had moved courts questioning the decision of the goverment on the leave issue. Supreme Court took up the matter for hearing and has given a dressing down to the government, stating the leave stands cancelled and Verma should return to office. But he has been barred from taking any policy related issues, till the CVC investigation is complete.
Central government was never humiliated like this. Alok Kumar Verma’s tenure would end on January 31. He was sent on compulsory leave, forcibly in October. This is a classic case of government interference over everything else. Supreme Court expressed dissatisfaction over such highhandedness on part of the government.
Right from the beginning, the autonomy of CBI has always been under a scanner because it’s autonomy seems more like tokenism than genuine. All the political parties that have been in power have been using CBI in some way or the other to settle scores with their political opponents. But the midnight operation and sending Verma on leave was a direct attack launched on the CBI. Supreme Court has reinstated Verma, clearly ignoring the reasoning provided by the government that the action was initiated based on the Central Vigilence Committee Commissioner’s report.
PM, Chief Justice of Supreme Court and leaders of opposition will sit together to decide about the future of CBI chief. The decision by the Supreme Court will have its impact on CBI even after Verma’s retirement by the end of the month. The governemnt cannot really take a unilateral adhoc decision regarding the next appointee as CBI director. The argument made by Fali S Nariman, representing Verma is that the director has two year service tenure and the decision made by the govetnment is ntohing but interference.
Central government had appointed Verma as CBI chief in 2017. Then he was sent on leave all of a sudden. Is there any truth in the allegations made by the opposition that Verma was going into the files and details of the Rafael deal made by the central government which caused him to be shunted out? Why was Asthana, who is considered a Modi aide, appointed as the director of CBI in the same month?
After Asthana’s appoinment, CBI turned into a warzone of internal bickerings. The central goverment is solely responsible for this. This brought out the fights into open space and ruined the confidence it enjoyed among people, thanks to Modi government. When Verma had travelled aborad, Asthana had attended a meeting on promotions for staff called by the CVC. Verma was livid when he heard that Asthana attended the meeting on his behalf, stating he had not designated anyone as acting chief. This brought out the differences of opinion among both seniors in CBI and both then lodged complaints citing corrpuption charges. The centre then woke up and sent both of them on leave and appointed Nageswara Rao as the acting chief. The centra government did not check with highpower committee for any suggestions. Advocate Prashanth Bhushan and others had submitted a plea to CBI seeking inquiry into Rafeal deal, that seems to be surrounding Modi at the moment. Based on this complaint, Verma had colletced a few details for further investination. Hence one version says this caused Modi goverment to train their guns on Verma and send him on leave. This is not totally far from the truth either. Central goverment got into a quick sand trying to protect Modi. This is a warning bell for the future goverments as well.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Inappropriate for MLAs seeking free IPL tickets, says D.K. Suresh
Bengaluru: Bengaluru Milk Union Ltd President D.K. Suresh on Monday said it is inappropriate for MLAs to seek free IPL tickets, adding that those interested in watching matches should pay for them personally.
Speaking to reporters near his residence in Sadashivanagar, he said, “IPL is a commercial tournament and does not represent the country. It is not right for public representatives to focus too much on such matters.”
Referring to the recent controversy during the RCB celebrations, he said, “let us find out who benefited the most from the statements made during the incident.” He also pointed out that BJP MLAs had received IPL tickets as well.
Responding to discussions about relocating the Chinnaswamy Stadium, Suresh said the government has already approved the construction of a new stadium at a location he had proposed.
“I had suggested building a stadium in Surya City and submitted a proposal for it. Bengaluru needs four stadiums in four directions to cater to its growing population and encourage youth participation in sports,” he said.
He noted that apart from Kanteerava Stadium, KSCA, and the Football Stadium, there are limited facilities in the city.
“When I was a Lok Sabha member, I had proposed allocating 100 acres in my constituency at Surya City. The land was later earmarked and the plan approved,” he added.
Suresh said he has discussed the project with Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan, Rajiv Gandhi Housing Corporation Chairman Shivalingegowda, and Anekal MLA Shivanna.
“The Cabinet has now approved the project, and a stadium will be developed on around 50–60 acres,” he said.
He further added that he has requested the Deputy Chief Minister to build another stadium at Shivarama Karanth Layout through the BDA, where 40 acres have been allocated. Plans are also being discussed to develop a well-equipped stadium in Bidadi.
Commending state government's recent bilingual policy move, Suresh said forcing children to learn three languages could affect their comprehension.
“It is a good decision to make two languages compulsory. Learning a third language should be left to the choice of students and parents,” he said.
Responding to criticism from BJP leaders, he said their tendency is to oppose every decision of the government.
“To please their central leadership, they take a pro-Hindi stance. Instead, they should advocate for the adoption of Kannada in all states,” he said.
When asked about the earlier three-language policy under Congress, he said, “the situation is different now. Today, the focus should be on quality learning. Kannada should remain the primary language, while students and parents can choose an additional language.”
