Make Vaccination Compulsory for Politicians
Throughout India, a Covaxin revolution is taking place under the leadership of the government. In addition to the distribution of the vaccine, politicians are trying to instill a sense of pride that Covaxin is a ‘Swadeshi’ vaccine. Undoubtedly, it is a matter of pride that the country has produced a vaccine in the face of the Coronavirus that battered the country. But, politicians more than experts are issuing statements about Covaxin. The Centre is spending crores of rupees for Covaxin. In such a situation, it is very important for Covaxin to prove its reliability. The vaccine is being distributed even as a controversy has emerged around the government’s approval for the Covaxin being manufactured by Bharat Biotech even before the third phase of testing could be completed. The government is still not been able to respond adequately to the various questions that doctors and experts have raised regarding the vaccine. Already, it is being reported in the media that Covaxin is causing adverse impact on many of those who have been vaccinated. But, the government that has denied this has clarified that only 0.18 per cent of the vaccinated have been adversely impacted. Of those who have been vaccinated against COVID-19, only 0.1 per cent of people have reported fluctuations in their bodies. The Centre has claimed that among these, only 0.002 people have been admitted into hospitals. At the same time, the Centre has regretted that doctors, ayahs, and health workers are refusing to get vaccinated.
One aspect should be observed here. The victims of the coronavirus are upper middle class and upper-class people. While tuberculosis, malaria, and other such diseases targeted the poor and slum dwellers, the coronavirus targeted people belonging to higher classes. The coronavirus entered India through airports from Indians living in foreign countries or those engaged in businesses or having connections with foreign countries and did not haunt the poor. But the lockdown that was imposed to check the spread of the coronavirus had a drastic impact on the poor. The number of people of the lower strata whose lives were destroyed due to the lockdown is far more than the number of upper-class people impacted by the coronavirus. And people from the lowest strata of society never demanded the Centre for the vaccine but asked to be rescued from hunger. “We are not scared of the Coronavirus but are scared of hunger”, migrant labourers said repeatedly and publicly. Ironically, having announced that the vaccine against the coronavirus has been manufactured, the Centre also announced that ‘civic workers will be given priority.’ If the coronavirus was truly a deadly disease, civic workers would have been the first victims. When the entire country was in lockdown and stayed indoors at home, these civic workers were cleaning the streets and collecting garbage without any fear of contracting the disease. They never feared the coronavirus, neither did the virus affect them. No labour organization requested to be vaccinated on priority. In such a situation, the government’s objective in showing its love and prioritizing civic workers for vaccination is clear. The malafide intention of the government to choose civic workers to test the efficacy of the vaccine and stop its distribution if they faced any adverse impact is very clear.
It is being alleged that hundreds of women who volunteered during the pandemic are being forced to be part of the vaccination drive. In Chitradurga, a nurse who refused to be vaccinated was forced by Minister Sriramulu to take the vaccination saying ‘Please take the vaccination. If you hesitate, what about the others’? Sriramulu could have taken the vaccine and encouraged the others to do so. Many politicians have been affected by the coronavirus and politicians mingle with the public in large numbers. Politicians should therefore be vaccinated on priority. In other countries, leaders have been vaccinated first. But, in India, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has not yet been vaccinated. Not just Modi, no other important leader has come forward to get vaccinated and inspire people. Does it not prove that the leaders who are recommending the vaccine do not have any trust on the efficacy of the vaccine? Moreover, a large number of doctors have refused to be vaccinated. The government has expressed its regret over this. When doctors are refusing the vaccine, how appropriate is it to force people to get vaccinated?
Within two days of the vaccine drive, more than 50 per cent of health workers of six central government hospitals in New Delhi refused to be administered the Bharat Biotech vaccine. Of the identified 1,250 vaccine beneficiaries, a total of 551 health workers reported for vaccination on January 16 and 18. This means only, 44.8 per cent of people have been vaccinated. Of the 81 hospitals in New Delhi, 75 hospitals are run jointly by the Delhi government and private sector. In these hospitals the Covishield vaccine that has been produced by Oxford-Astra Zeneca has been distributed.
India is now divided over the vaccine. One particular vaccine is being distributed for the poor and another for the rich. Until politicians and doctors openly and fearlessly get vaccinated, the common man should not be forced to take it. The government should also not mess with the lives of people only to gain political mileage.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Waqf Amendment Bill: Amit Shah says no provision of non-Muslim involvement in religious matter
New Delhi: Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday addressed concerns regarding the Waqf Amendment Bill, 2025, stating that non-Muslims will not be involved in any religious affairs related to Waqf properties. His remarks came while speaking in the Lok Sabha, where the bill was tabled for consideration and passage.
Shah clarified that non-Muslim members will be included only in the Council and Waqf Board, but their role will be limited to administrative matters concerning properties donated under Waqf law. They will not interfere in religious activities or the management of religious institutions, he assured.
"First of all, no non-Muslim would come into the Waqf. Understand this clearly... There is no such provision to include any non-Muslim among those who manage religious institutions; we do not want to do this," Shah said. He added that there is a misconception being spread that the amendment would interfere with religious practices or Waqf properties, which he claimed was an attempt to mislead the minority community for political reasons.
The Waqf Amendment Bill, 2025, was presented by Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, following recommendations by a Joint Parliamentary Committee. Waqf refers to assets donated solely for religious or charitable purposes under Islamic law, and their use for any other purpose is prohibited.
Shah further emphasized that only property legally owned by an individual can be donated under Waqf law. "A person cannot donate government property or property that belongs to someone else," he said.
